Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: gujarat Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 76 results (0.054 seconds)

Oct 28 2002 (HC)

Anita Bhandari Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-28-2002

Reported in : (2003)2GLR1093

..... appeal filed by the bank was required to be allowed and appeal filed by the original petitioners was required to be dismissed.16. we are exercising our jurisdiction in letters patent and considering the plight of poor widow and her minor children, we do not want to interfere with the order passed by the learned single judge awarding interim compensation. in ..... policy and sanction from union of india it was not possible for them to provide employment to petitioner no.1.8. learned counsel mr. calla for the appellants of letters patent appeal no.1173 of 2002-original petitioners vehemently submitted that in such type of cases there was no need for the appellants-petitioners to approach civil court by way of ..... the judgment and order by which full compensation not given and appointment on compassionate ground not given to petitioner no.1 herein they filed letters patent appeal no.1173 of 2002 with civil application no.9439 of 2002.7. learned counsel mr. desai for the appellant bank vehemently submitted that it was not open to the ..... the parties arriving at any settlement as may be acceptable to the parties.' 5. aggrieved of the aforesaid reliefs granted in favour of the petitioners, appellant-dena bank filed letters patent appeal no.1130 of 2002 with civil application no.8914 of 2002 for interim relief.6. the original petitioners-anita bhandari and her minor children aggrieved of the part of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 2002 (HC)

Shrikrishna K. Yadav Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-09-2002

Reported in : (2002)3GLR578

..... accordingly. interim relief is vacated. notice is discharged.at this stage, learned counsel mrs. mehta submitted for extension of interim relief enjoyed so far during the course of the letters patent appeal for a spanof six weeks. learned counsel mr. pujari, learned a.g.p., for respondent nos. 1 to 3 and mr. j.p. bhatt for respondent nos. 4 to ..... , came to be decided and dismissed by the learned single judge vide judgment dated 3rd july, 2001. having been aggrieved by the said judgment, the appellants have preferred this letters patent appeal.5. mrs. k.a. mehta, learned counsel for the appellants has contended that the appellants passed the qualifying examination in the year 1992 and as per the position of ..... mr. jayant p. bhatt, learned advocate for respondent nos. 4 to 7.2. the appellants who are the original petitioners have approached this court under clause 15 of the letters patent challenging the judgment of the judge (coram : p.b. majmudar, j.), dated 3rd my, 2001 delivered in special civil application no. 3183 of 1994. in the said petition, the appellants ..... submission thatthe appellants intend to pursue further remedy before the hon'ble supreme court,in the larger interest of justice the order of status quo during the pendencyof the letters patent appeal shall stand extended for a further period of sixweeks. direct service is permitted for respondent nos. 1 to 3. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 2002 (HC)

Purshottam Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. (Part Ii) Vs. Surat Municipal C ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-26-2002

Reported in : AIR2003Guj37; (2002)3GLR489

..... court appeal are, normally, governed and regulated by the statutory provisions conferring right of appeal and jurisdiction to decide the appeal. intra-court appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent, arising out of the proceedings under article 226 of the constitution is not at par with other statutory inter-court appeals. it is, indeed, continuation of the proceedings under article ..... 226 of the constitution. the high court hearing the intra-court appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent arising out of proceedings under article 226 of the constitution, ultimately, exercises the powers conferred upon it by article 226 of the constitution. 10. the language employed in clause (3 ..... petition under clause (1) of article 226 of the constitution as well as to any proceedings relating thereto. 11. indisputably, the proceedings in appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent arising out of the petition under article 226 of the constitution emanate from a petition under clause (1) of article 226 of the constitution, and such proceedings are, therefore, clearly ..... opportunity of being heard.12. in the instant case, the ex parte interim order dated 18th february, 2002 was passed in civil application no. 1310 of 2002 in letters patent appeal, which are proceedings in relation to and arising out of the petition under article 226(1) of the constitution, and it was passed without furnishing to the applicant copies .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 2002 (HC)

Suresh Kumar Dutt Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-14-2002

Reported in : (2002)3GLR813

..... by the original petitioner and approved by the learned single judge is required to be confirmed and affirmed by us while dismissing the letters patent appeal on merits, even if the analogous provisions of res judicata are not taken into consideration for the dismissal of the appeal on technical ..... record of the present case, which would warrant the interference of this court in exercise of appellate powers under clause 15 of the letters patent. the learned single judge, upon appraisal and evaluation of the facts and the ambit of the powers of the respondent-authority in condonation of ..... law, rejected the writ petition, and hence, this letters patent appeal. 8. after having considered the long litigating journey, again we are called upon to consider the merits of the claim of the original petitioner ..... afresh consideration and decision according to law on merits by order dated 4-9-1996 in letters patent appeal no. 360 of 1996. the learned single judge again, on consideration of the facts and circumstances and the relevant proposition and rules and ..... and filed writ petition being special civil application no. 1505 of 1995, which was also rejected by the learned single judge. however, in letters patent appeal no. 360 of 1996 challenging the order of the learned single judge, the division bench of this court directed learned single judge for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 2002 (HC)

D.B. Jadeja and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-17-2002

Reported in : (2002)4GLR3705

..... identical petition being special civil application no. 7130 of 1999. however, this petition has been summarily rejected, against which, said six petitioners had preferred letters patent appeal being l.p.a. no. 1324 of 1999 and said l.p.a. is also finally decided by this court [coram : mr. m. ..... made in the rejoinder filed by the petitioners. therefore, in pursuance of the directions issued by the division bench of this court in letters patent appeal no. 222 of 2001 and accordingly five posts of class iv employees are kept vacant with the state government. in light of these facts ..... agents to keep five posts of class iv employees vacant for the appellants, in the event of their success in this case. thereafter, this letters patent appeal has been finally heard and disposed of by the division bench of this court on date 26m june, 2001, whereby the division bench has ..... said ad-interim relief pending the present petition and vacated the ad-interim relief granted earlier. against the order vacating the ad-interim relief, letters patent appeal no. 222 of 2001 filed on 23rd march, 2001, wherein the l.p.a. bench has passed the order on 3rd april, 2001 ..... was decided and interim relief granted in the said application earlier came to be vacated, and therefore, being aggrieved thereof, the petitioners immediately preferred letters patent appeal no. 222 of 2001. thereafter, the respondent no. 2 has issued order of termination on 23rd march, 2001 and sending therewith retrenchment compensation .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 10 2002 (HC)

The State of Gujarat Vs. Shri B.B. Chauhan

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-10-2002

Reported in : (2003)4GLR256

..... a special provision to the exclusion of section 73 of the contract act is a matter of appreciation of facts in a case, and when the decision thereon is not patently absurd or wholly unreasonable, there is no scope for interference by courts dealing with a challenge to the award'.15. on the basis of the aforesaid facts and circumstances as ..... law to it to come to a conclusion one way or the other, is too involved a process and it cannot be stated that such an error is apparent or patent on the face of the award. whether under the context of the terms and conditions of a contract, a stipulation in the form and nature of cl. 14(ii) operates ..... in a.i.r. 2001 sc 2933, wherein it is held that `unless the error of law sought to be pointed out by the petitioners in the instant case is patent on the face of the award neither the high court nor the supreme court can interfere with the award. the exercise to be done by examining clause 14(ii) of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 2002 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Gujarat State Fertilizers Co. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-19-2002

Reported in : (2003)179CTR(Guj)266; [2003]259ITR526(Guj)

..... of development rebate. section 43a(1) itself refers to section 35(1)(iv) {capital expenditure on scientific research related to the business) and section 35a (capital expenditure on acquisition of patent rights or copy- rights) which are also one time allowances. there are many other one time allowances, but none of them is specifically excluded by the legislature except the development ..... of fluctuation in the foreign exchange rate even in case of some other one time allowances like those for scientific research under section 35(1)(iv) or for acquisition of patent rights under section 35a.43. for the aforesaid reasons, we are of the view that, with respect, the division bench in the windsor foods ltd.'s case : [1999]235itr249(guj .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 17 2002 (HC)

Rajnagar Textiles Mills No. 1 Vs. Textile Labour Association

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-17-2002

Reported in : (2003)ILLJ38Guj

..... consideration all the relevant materials and circumstances, facts and aspects is fully justified requiring no interference in exercise of powers under clause 15 of the letters patent. therefore one and only fate which this letters patent appeal deserves to be met with is dismissal at the admission stage. accordingly, it is dismissed with costs, which is quantified at rs. 3000/- 4. the ..... orderj.n. bhatt, j. 1. the challenge in this letters patent appeal by invocation of clause 15 of the letters patent act, is against the judgment and order dated february 23, 1998 rendered by the learned single judge in special civil application no. 3691 of 1997, whereby a challenge against the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2002 (HC)

K.D. Vohra Vs. Kamleshbhai Gobarbhai Patel

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-11-2002

Reported in : (2003)2GLR1343

..... well as the rules and regulations applicable to the post and the constitutional provisions.8.1 the learned counsel who appeared for the direct recruits, who are respondents in letters patent appeal no. 485 of 2002, adopted the contentions raised by the learned advocate general, pointing out that the appointment orders of all the direct recruits have already been issued.8 ..... also submitted that many of the appellants had withdrawn their earlier petitions and tiled fresh petitions on the same cause of action, though no liberty was reserved when the letters patent appeals were disposed of, on withdrawal of those petitions. explaining the different stands taken in the affidavits filed on behalf of the state government, the learned advocate general contended that ..... work within the framework of the constitution as well as to see that, because of inaction or omission, unnecessary and avoidable litigations may not come before the court. in letters patent appeal no. 1057 of 1999 and cognate appeals, these petitioners who had appealed against the said order of the learned single judge, withdrew their petitions without reserving any liberty to ..... them in service, holding that they would be treated as surplus but not entitled to any regular salary or financial advantage.3.2 the case of the appellants of letters patent appeal no. 540, 558 to 561 of 2002 and other matters was that they were interviewed by the duly constituted staff selection committee in january, 1990 and appointed as lecturers .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2002 (HC)

Nilesh Bhogilal Dave Vs. Tikoo Traders Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-29-2002

Reported in : (2002)4GLR3184

..... , agreeing with the views and observations of the labour court, summarily dismissed the writ petition, and that is how the workman is prompted to invoke clause 15 of the letters patent by filing this appeal questioning and challenging the summary dismissal of the writ petition.7. the learned advocate mr. lakhia for the appellant-original petitioner-workman, in his marathon submissions ..... appellant herein-original petitioner-workman, have not only startled us but, unfortunately, have shattered and tremored our conscience.2. the appellant, invoking the aids of clause 15 of the letters patent, in this appeal, has questioned the legality and validity of the judgment, dated 27.6.2001, of the learned single judge, whereby, the award of the labour court in reference ..... ultimate conclusions recorded by the labour court and approved by the learned single judge.9. in the result, therefore, we are left with no alternative but to dismiss this letters patent appeal at the threshold. accordingly, it is dismissed summarily. civil application also shall stand dismissed. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //