Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: gujarat Year: 2002 Page 3 of about 76 results (0.006 seconds)

Jul 01 2002 (HC)

Gordhanpar Gram Panchayat Vs. Collector and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-01-2002

Reported in : (2002)3GLR594

d.s. sinha, c.j. 1. heard mr. rajesh c. kakkad, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, at length and in great detail.2. instant letters patent appeal is directed against the order dated 17th june, 2002, passed by the learned single judge of this court in special civil application no. 5509 of 2002, whereby the orders .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 2002 (HC)

Shakuntala P. Devlekar Vs. Surat Municipal Corporation

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-30-2002

Reported in : (2003)4GLR154

r.k. abichandani, adv.1. these letters patent appeals have been directed against the common judgment and order dated 1st august 1989 passed by the learned single judge in a group of petitions in which the petitioners had .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 2002 (HC)

Nandlal Bavanjibhai Posiya and ors. Vs. Director of Agriculture Market ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-08-2002

Reported in : AIR2002Guj348; (2002)2GLR1132

..... vacated. the petition is dismissed. it is directed that no-confidence motion passed against petitioner nos. 1 and 2 shall now be the result, both the letters patent appeals and both the special civil applications are hereby dismissed. all pending civil applications stand disposed of and interim orders are vacated.rule is discharged. however, in the circumstances, ..... to discharge duties of chairman of social justice committee. after the learned single judge (m. s. shah, j.), dismissed the petition by the order impugned in this letters patent appeal, interim order was continued by the division bench, and as a result thereof, learned counsel for the appellant now informs, that not only mat the petitioner has completed ..... 7278 of 2001 is also concerning moving and passing of no-confidence motion against the chairman of junagadh agricultural produce market committee. letters patent appeal no. 1451 of 1997 is concerning moving and passing of no-confidence motion against the chairman of social justice committee under section 123 of the gujarat panchayats act, ..... of an order of status quo passed by the learned single judge in special civil application no. 9842 of 2001. special civil application no. 5120 of 2001 and letters patent appeal no. 1177 of 2001 are cognate matters concerning moving and passing of no-confidence motion against the chairman of agricultural produce market committee, valsad. special civil application no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 08 2002 (HC)

Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-08-2002

Reported in : (2003)1GLR158; (2003)ILLJ1066Guj

..... 1998 before this court challenging the amended notification, but the same was dismissed by the learned single judge on 11th september, 1998, against which letters patent appeal no. 1285 of 1998 is pending. however, no interim relief staying the operations was granted by this court in appeal. the history of ..... issued under section 10(1) of the act by the state government dated 3-6-1998 is directly under challenge in the aforesaid letters patent appeals pending before the division bench of this court. i am informed that before the learned single judges this challenge was mainly based on ..... to the validity of the notifications issued by the state government was pending final disposal before the division bench of this court in the letters patent appeals without approaching this court and seeking its permission.(iv) in case it is held that central government is not the 'appropriate government, qua ..... regard to the validity of the notifications issued by the state government is still not finally decided since it is the subject-matter of letters patent appeals pending before the division bench of this court, and therefore, it cannot be said that for iffco in the operations of stacking and ..... dismissed by this court [coram : h.l. gokhale, j.] by judgment dated 11th september, 1998. against the said judgment, iffco has preferred letters patent appeal no. 1281 of 1998 which is pending before the division bench for disposal. however, no interim relief has been granted in the same. similarly, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 24 2002 (HC)

Sarvagna Navinchandra Godiawala Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-24-2002

Reported in : (2003)2GLR1266

..... appellants therein unsuccessfully challenged the decision of the state government, dismissing the revision, by filing special civil application. aggrieved by the decision in the special civil application, the aforesaid letters patent appeal was filed.16. on behalf of respondent no. 3 therein, it was submitted as under :'8. on behalf of respondent no. 3, mr. a.j. patel has submitted that ..... pocketed the undue benefits pursuant to transaction of sale which is under challenge.'it is also pertinent to extract paragraphs 16 and 17 of the aforesaid judgment in the letters patent appeal :'16. mr. a.j. patel has drawn our attention to the judgment of the division bench (coram : mr. k.g. balakrishnan, c.j. & mr. justice j.n. bhatt) dated ..... 2-9-1999 in letters patent appeal no. 1153 of 1998 in special civil application no. 6265 of 1998 in the case of legal heirs of mithabhai mavjibhai v. state of gujarat. before the division bench .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 2002 (HC)

Rajendraprasad Shankarlal Purohit Vs. Executive Engineer

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-20-2002

Reported in : (2002)4GLR2819

..... state of gujarat by filing special civil application no. 473 of 2000 which came to be summarily dismissed by this court by order dated 31st january, 2000 and the letters patent appeal no. 147 of 2000 filed by the state of gujarat against that order was also dismissed by the division bench of this court on 8.5.2000. thereafter, by ..... and he deemed to be in service for all purposes.the petitioner rajendraprasad shankarlal purohit had filed further affidavit in reply in civil application no. 6666 of 2002 in letters patent appeal no. 1067 of 2002 dated february, 2003. in the said affidavit in reply, it was averred by the petitioner that the services of one shri mayank ramanlal joshi who ..... contention regarding the project coming to an end during the pendency of the reference be considered and decided as early as possible, preferably within one month from today. the letters patent appeal is allowed to the aforesaid extent and main, special civil application is remanded to the learned single judge only on this point. no order as to costs.'the appellate ..... months from the date of receipt of the order. accordingly, the reference was allowed.2. this decision was challenged by the respondent in letters patent appeal no.1067 of 2002. the division bench has decided the letters patent appeal on 7th october, 2003. the division bench has confirmed the order passed by this court in respect of granting 50% of back wages .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 28 2002 (HC)

Hiralal G. Siyal and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-28-2002

Reported in : (2003)2GLR1409

..... the municipality. 10. subject to the aforesaid observation and direction, the petition is not entertained at this stage.' the aforesaid order was challenged by way of an appeal, being letters patent appeal no. 466 of 2002, and the order of the learned single judge was set aside by the division bench in the letters ..... patent appeal. in the meanwhile, the respondent no. 1 furnished some documents in respect of charge no. 3 regarding stray animals, dogs and cattle as well as in connection with ground .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 2002 (HC)

Sunil Bhalchandra Jani Vs. Gujarat Electricity Board

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-18-2002

Reported in : [2002(93)FLR1050]; (2002)2GLR1379

..... beyond its jurisdiction, refusal to exercise jurisdiction, error of law apparent on record as distinguished from a mere mistake of law, arbitrary or capricious exercise of authority or discretion, a patent error in procedure, arriving at a finding which is perverse or based on no material or resulting in manifest injustice. as regards finding of fact of the inferior court, the ..... of record as also in cases where the orders impugned represent an arbitrary or capricious exercise of the authority or discretion and even in cases where the order suffers from patent error or procedure or even in the cases where the exercise of powers represent a finding on me basis of no material or is likely to result in manifest injustice .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 2002 (HC)

Ganesh Chhababhai Vallabhai Patel Vs. Cit

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-09-2002

Reported in : (2002)175CTR(Guj)498

..... of mistakes under section 154 of the act is the limited power which is restricted to rectification of mistakes apparent from the record. it must be a mistake which is patent on the face of the record and does not call for detailed investigation of the facts or require an elaborate argument to establish it. a decision on a debatable point ..... supreme court in t.s. balaram, ito v. volkart bros. : [1971]82itr50(sc) was cited for the proposition that a mistake apparent on the record must be an obvious and patent mistake and not something which can be established by a long drawn process of reasoning by a long drawn process of reasoning on points on which there may be conceivably .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 2002 (HC)

Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation Vs. A.M. Shaikh

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-11-2002

Reported in : (2002)2GLR1807

..... no. 393 of 2000 decided by this court on 27th january, 2000), similar question was examined by this court and the petition filed by the corporation was rejected. thereafter, letters patent appeal no. 905 of 2000 was preferred by the corporation against the order passed by the learned single judge of this court wherein the division bench of this court has ..... rejected the letters patent appeal by order dated 12-3-2001. thereafter, special leave petition no. 12607 of 2001 was preferred before the hon'ble supreme court and the said special leave petition was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //