Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: gujarat Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 66 results (0.006 seconds)

Oct 14 2004 (HC)

PWD Employees' Union Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-14-2004

Reported in : (2005)1GLR262

..... judgment of the division bench, the review petition filed by the respondent no.1, was not maintainable. in fact, the judgment of the letters patent bench was acted upon and it stood exhausted and the review petition was futile. under such circumstances, the review petition ought not to have been ..... march, 1982 which was not produced by the respondents either before the learned single judge in special civil application no. 3607 of 1982, letters patent appeal no. 353 of 1997 and then before the apex court in the civil appeal against the judgment dated 30th january, 1996 as confirmed by ..... further directions under the same order dated 25th february, 2004 in misc. civil application no. 2239 of 2003 which is under challenge in this letters patent appeal.7. learned advocate mr. shalin mehta appearing for the appellant union has raised contention that the judgment given by the learned single judge of ..... the state has carried out this exercise or not. after making the aforesaid observations as per para 8 of the oral judgment, said letters patent appeal against the oral judgment dated 30th january,1996 was dismissed by the division bench of this court. thereafter, the said oral judgment dated january ..... under para 3 of the order dated 7.2.2003. except that, no other prayers were sought by the applicant state of gujarat. alongwith the letters patent appeal, order in question dated february 25, 2004, oral judgment dated january 30, 1996 in special civil application no. 3607 of 1982, circular dated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 2004 (HC)

B.V. Patel and ors. Vs. Gujarat Water Supplies and Sewerage Board and ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-10-2004

Reported in : (2004)2GLR1326

..... association, by filing special civil application no. 8640 of 1999, challenged the scheme and policy pursuant to the circular dated 27-11-1997, unsuccessfully, and also, lost in the letters patent appeal.13. it is very clear that the petitioners, who are the officers of respondent no. 3-corporation, continued on deputation with respondent no. 1 by way of temporary arrangement ..... appointments as fresh assistant engineer or additional assistant engineer, in the said board. it is, also, further reported in the course of hearing that during the pendency of the letters patent appeal, some of the original petitioners have, also, accepted one of the other alternatives. this controversy, thus, has shrunk down to a very short circumference and very narrow dimension, ..... government-undertaking or abolition of posts, pursuant to the policy-decision of the government, is the sole question which has come to the fore in this letters patent appeal, under clause 15 of the letters patent, challenging the judgment of the learned single judge rendered, on 5-12-2002, in a writ petition being special civil application no. 6990 of 2002, filed ..... law, we do not find any infirmity or unreasonableness or perversity in the judgment of the learned single judge, and therefore, this letters patent appeal deserves only and only one legal fate of dismissal. accordingly, this letters patent appeal shall stand dismissed without any order as to costs. this being so, there will be no order in the civil application.the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2004 (HC)

Joshi Tushar Tansukhbhai and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-25-2004

Reported in : (2004)2GLR1188

..... of theconstitution is meritless and without any substance. theimpugned government resolution is upheld and we confirmand affirm the views of the learned single judge in theimpugned judgment and, the letters patent appeal,therefore, shall stand dismissed leaving the parties tobear their own costs. notice is discharged. however,the recommendations made by the learned single judge inthe impugned judgment are quite weighty ..... the administrativedecisions referable to pay-fixation and parity of pay.the courts should approach such matters with restraintand interfere only when they are satisfied that thedecision of the government is patently irrational, unjustand prejudicial to a section of employees and thegovernment, while taking the decision, has ignoredfactors which are material and relevant for a decision inthe matter though it is a ..... bythe learned single judge could not be said to be in anyway to be unjust, unreasonable or vulnerable, requiringour interference in exercise of our powers underclause-15 of the letters patent.13. the learned single judge has also placed relianceon the judgment of single bench in special civilapplication no. 5218 of 1998. in the said decision, thescheme, virtually, identical, which was .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 14 2004 (HC)

Tushar D. Bhatt Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-14-2004

Reported in : (2004)3GLR680

..... disciplinary authority in some cases while not doing so in other cases. in such cases, the right of the employee depends upon the choice of the higher/ appellate authority which patently results in discrimination between an employee and employee. surely, such a situation cannot savour of legality. hence we are of the view that the contention advanced on behalf of the ..... also it is our common experience that petitions of the single judge are placed before the division bench hearing petitions involving identical issue, causing loss of right of filing letter patent appeal to some of the litigants, much to their dislike; but such course is permissible and many a times it is resorted to by this court. similarly in criminal appeals ..... single judge of this court quashed the order of termination of the service of the petitioner. against the said decision of the learned single judge, g.e.b. preferred letters patent appeal before the division bench. the division bench confirmed the order of reinstatement in service, but modified the order with regard to payment of back wages and reduced it from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 2004 (HC)

Vinodkumar Rajabhai Rathod Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-05-2004

Reported in : (2005)2GLR1274

..... receipt of the final list of candidates recommended by the gpsc. all these directions were confirmed by the division bench in the judgment dated 11.12.2002 in the letters patent appeals with scathing criticism of the tortious inaction on the part of the state government and gpsc. the state government did not, however, pay heed to the above directions and ..... learned single judge was carried in appeals and by judgment dated 11.12.2002 (reported in 2003(2) glr 1343) the letters patent bench dismissed the appeals and confirmed the directions given by the learned single judge. the letters patent bench also took serious note of the inaction on the part of the state government as well as the gpsc of a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 2004 (HC)

Bhanuben L. Chovatiya Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-05-2004

Reported in : 2005(2)ESC1411; [2005(106)FLR770]

..... receipt of the final list of candidates recommended by the gpsc. all these directions were confirmed by the division bench in the judgment dated 11.12.2002 in the letters patent appeals with scathing criticism of the tortious inaction on the part of the state government and gpsc. the state government did not, however, pay heed to the above directions and ..... learned single judge was carried in appeals and by judgment dated 11.12.2002 (reported in 2003(2) glr 1343) the letters patent bench dismissed the appeals and confirmed the directions given by the learned single judge. the letters patent bench also took serious note of the inaction on the part of the state government as well as the gpsc of a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 2004 (HC)

Ayesaben Nur Mohammad Vs. Competent Authority

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-25-2004

Reported in : (2005)2GLR1082

..... that these are illegally acquired properties. the orders of the competent authority as well as appellate tribunal are even otherwise erroneous and bad in law. the order of detention is patently bad and illegal even on the ground that for the alleged incident, for which the cofeposa order has been passed, the detenue has been acquitted by the competent criminal court ..... as the order of the appellate tribunal are illegal and could not be sustained.10. mr. sanjanwala has further submitted that the order of detention passed against the detenue is patently bad and illegal. if the competent authority wanted to base the safema proceedings on the order of detention of the detenue, it was mandatory for them to have served a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 2004 (HC)

Mahendrabhai Ravjibhai Patel Vs. Ambalal Prabhudas Patel

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-26-2004

Reported in : 2005CriLJ840

..... lined equipment for chemical process industries. it is contended that the said process of manufacturing glass-frit for the purpose of glass lining equipment, article machinery, etc. is an exclusive patent of the said american company, which had by way of technical collaboration permitted the petitioner's company (hereinafter referred to as 'the gmm') and the gmm was specially trained for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 2004 (HC)

Union Bank of India Vs. K.R. Ajwalia

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-16-2004

Reported in : [2005(105)FLR364]; (2005)ILLJ824Guj

..... financial loss only, is not established since financial loss caused to the bank was not worked out. i also find that the division bench in the decision rendered in letters patent appeal no.730 of 2002 had observed that the impugned orders were made in the year 1988 and at a distant point of time, it would not be proper to ..... guilty of suppression of material facts since, in his submission, the above decisions of learned single judge as well as the division bench in letters patent appeal were passed in case of the very same bank and as per the contention of the counsel for the respondent, under similar circumstances which, fact has not been stated ..... learned single judge of this high court in special civil application no.8091 of 1988 as well as the decision of a division bench of this high court in letters patent appeal no.730 of 2002 upholding the decision of the learned single judge mentioned above. learned advocate for the respondent has also strongly urged before me that the petitioner is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2004 (HC)

Gujarat Maritime Board Vs. Kanji Natha Karmata

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-29-2004

Reported in : [2004(101)FLR1226]

bhawani singh, c.j. 1. through this letters patent appeal, order of thelearned single judge dated 1.7.1994 passed in specialcivil application no. 1832 of 1993 has been challenged.kanji natha karmata (petitioner) applied for appointmenton compassionate ground, .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //