Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: gujarat Year: 2004 Page 3 of about 66 results (0.006 seconds)

Feb 03 2004 (HC)

M.B. Phanse Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-03-2004

Reported in : (2004)2GLR1299

..... of the order ought to have made areference to the pendency of the letters patent appeal,which according to mr.trivedi, the learned advocate forthe petitioner, was brought to his notice. if that isso, it is not proper on his part to escape suchreference. be ..... standtaken by the state government that theservice rendered by a retired person asmember or president of the gcst and isnot pensionable.'but then, against that order, it is reported thatletters patent appeal no.1156 of 1999 is filed, which isadmitted on 29th october, 2001 by this court(coram:j.n.bhatt & d.h.waghela, jj.) and the same ispending.the author ..... of thesaid judgement is quoted in the impugned order, as it wascited before the authority.mr.m.s.rao, learned agp, is not able to point outfiling of any letters patent appeal against the aforesaiddecision, cited by mr.trivedi. not only that, nojudgement to the contrary either of the learned singlejudge or the division bench is cited.this court is in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 2004 (HC)

Poul Cyril Parmar Vs. District Education Officer

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-01-2004

Reported in : (2004)2GLR482

..... the respondents to work out the petitioners claim for pension within reasonable time and in case not more than six months. against the said judgment no letters patent appeal has been preferred. the petitioner, therefore, submits that the respondents have not complied with the direction given by the learned single judge, instead they ..... has appeared on their behalf.6. having gone through the record of these petitions and in particular the judgment of the division bench delivered in letters patent appeal no. 788 of 1998, it is clear that the factor that weighed with the apex court for remanding the matter to this court for ..... them discriminatory treatment by not extending to them the benefit of the pension scheme.2.1 the said decision came to be challenged by way of letters patent appeal and since it was time barred, civil application no. 11548 of 1998 was also filed alongwith it. the division bench of this court vide ..... by the division bench of this court (coram : m.r. calla, n.g. nandi, jj.) vide judgment dated 31st july, 2001 rendered in letters patent appeal no. 788 of 1998 in special civil application no. 3635 of 1982, they have been heard together and now they are being disposed of by this ..... is likely to affect a large number of persons and also considering the explanation furnished by the appellants for the delay in filing the letters patent appeal, we feel that this matter requires to be finally decided by the high court.keeping in view the larger interests, we condone the delay .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 2004 (HC)

Mayooriben J. Thakore Vs. Gujarat Agro Industries

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-05-2004

Reported in : [2005(104)FLR8]; (2004)2GLR1707

..... decided by the judgment and order dated 4.4.2000, the management has reinstated the petitioner and that fact is recorded in the order of the division bench in letters patent appeal. taking into consideration the aforesaid facts, particularly the fact that the petitioner is reinstated in service by the management, the request is granted. the operation and implementation of this ..... december 31, 1990. thereafter, it will be open to either parties to request for fixed date of hearing.'the matter was then heard finally and disposed, against which, a letters patent appeal was preferred wherein an order was passed and as stated hereinabove, the matter was remitted back for fresh hearing.4. the short question for the consideration of this court ..... petition was heard finally and disposed of by the learned single judge (mr. justice c.k. thakkar, as he then was). being aggrieved of that, the respondents had filed letters patent appeal being lpa no.162 of 2000, which came to be allowed by judgment and order dated 19th august 2003 (coram: mr. justice b.j. shethna & mr. justice ravi r .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 2004 (HC)

B.M. Rao Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-02-2004

Reported in : (2005)1GLR481

..... stated hereinbefore.iv. mr. patel, superintending engineer, similarly, situated officer, had initiated legal battle by filing a writ petition, being special civil application no. 4887 of 1993, wherein the letters patent appeal no. 262 of 1993 came to be filed, against interim order of single bench, wherein the division bench of this court, allowed the appeal and directed the state government ..... keeping their cases 'open' in view of the issuance of charge-sheets to both of them. not only that, in the miscellaneous civil application no. 974 of 1993 in letters patent appeal no. 262 of 1993, preferred by mr.patel, the division bench, specifically, observed that, as on 16-02-1993, the date on which the dpc met, no even decision .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 2004 (HC)

Gujarat Rajya Ardh Sakari Audhiyogick Karmachari Sangh Vs. State of Gu ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-08-2004

Reported in : [2005(106)FLR480]; (2005)1GLR135

..... decision of this court [ coram : h.k.rathod, j. ] was challenged before higher forum in division bench [ coram : m.r.call and n.g.nandi, jj ] by way of letters patent appeal no.447 of 2001 in special civil application no.10673 of 2000. the division bench of this court vide order dated 20th june, 2001 had dismissed the letters ..... patent appeal. thereafter, the order made by division bench was carried to the hon'ble supreme court by preferring special leave to appeal [civil] no.18574 of 2001. the hon'ble .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 2004 (HC)

G.S.R.T.C. Vs. Lallubhai K. Patel

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-04-2004

Reported in : [2005(106)FLR495]

..... the purpose of questioning the validity and the legality of the said award of the labour court, valsad, interalia contending that the impugned award is not only unreasonable, unjust but patently illegal in the face of the establishment of fraud and serious misconduct on the part of the employee - the respondent in participating in the election, which is controverted and countenanced ..... of gross misconduct and serious dereliction of duty. it is in this context, the impugned award of the labour court, with due respect, to the labour court, is palpably and patently illegal requiring interference of this court in exercise of constitutional writ jurisdiction, so as to put the miscarriage of justice, resulted into in a proper and legal shape by quashing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2004 (HC)

Mulchandbhai N. Parmar Vs. District Superintendent of Police

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-09-2004

Reported in : (2005)2GLR1291

..... the civil application. paragraph 5(a) of the civil application reads as under:'pending the hearing and final disposal of the letters patent appeal, your lordships will be pleased to stay the execution and operation of the order dated 11th november 1998 passed by the learned single judge (kundan singh, j.), in special ..... petitioner, in view of the fact that, subsequently, the division bench of this court [coram: c.k.thakker (as his lordship then was) & a.l. dave, jj.], while admitting letters patent appeal no. 1358 of 1998, by order dated 18th november 1998, passed in civil application no. 10699 of 1998, granted interim relief as prayed for in paragraph 5(a) of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 26 2004 (HC)

J.A. Desai Vs. Gujarat Housing Board

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-26-2004

Reported in : [2005(105)FLR359]

..... in the lurch.'4.0. mr. mehta learned advocate appearing for the respondent-board submitted that the issue is already covered by the decision of this court delivered in letters patent appeal no. 92 of 1993 wherein the order passed by the learned single judge of this court granting benefits was set aside and the special civil application no. 4494 of ..... benefits.4.3. lastly mr. mehta has relied upon the decision of this court in the case of harish m. bhatt and ors. v. union of india delivered in letters patent appeal no. 1120 of 1996 dated 26th august, 1996 wherein similar issue was raised and this court while considering the decision of the apex court in the case of d .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 2004 (HC)

Harenbhai R. Parekh Vs. Satishbhai Asandas Krishnani Administrator of ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-04-2004

Reported in : AIR2004Guj342

..... be answerable to the court and be responsible for carrying out the orders of the court.s.o. to 7th april, 2004.'12. the above order was challenged in letters patent appeal no.1052/2004. i am informed that the petitioner has withdrawn the civil suit no.2871/2002 pending before the city civil court on 9th april, 2004. the letters ..... patent appeal no.1052/2004 has also been withdrawn on 13th april, 2004. the respondent no.3 has submitted that he is not aware of the withdrawal of the suit nor .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 14 2004 (HC)

Gujarat Vidhyapith Vs. Becharbhai Nagajibhai Bharwad

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-14-2004

Reported in : (2005)1GLR407

..... noted that the decision of the learned single judge was upheld by a division bench of this high court in a decision dated 25.7.79 while dismissing the letters patent appeal no. 174/79. one may also note that finding that the provisions of section 40-b of the bombay primary education act are in pari materia with the provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //