Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: gujarat Year: 2004 Page 6 of about 66 results (0.006 seconds)

Jan 15 2004 (HC)

Sapjaybhai R. Patel Vs. Assessing Officer

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-15-2004

Reported in : [2004]135TAXMAN210(Guj)

..... mistake apparent from the record of assessments of the firm. the hon'ble supreme court has further held that a mistake apparent on the record must be an obvious and patent mistakes and not something which can be established by a long drawn process of reasoning on points on which there may be conceivably section a decision on a debatable point .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2004 (HC)

Aop of Sanjaybhai R. Patel and 11 ors. Vs. Assessing Officer

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-15-2004

Reported in : (2004)187CTR(Guj)583

..... a mistake apparent from the record of assessments of the firm. the honble supreme court has further held that a mistake apparent on the record must be an obvious and patent mistake and not something which can be established by a long drawn process of reasoning on points on which there may be conceivably two opinions. a decision on a debatable .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2004 (HC)

Aop of Sanjaybhai R. Patel and 11 ors. Vs. Assessing Officer - Asstt. ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-15-2004

Reported in : [2004]267ITR129(Guj)

..... mistake apparent from the record of assessments of the firm. the hon'ble supreme court has further held that a mistake apparent on the record must be an obvious and patent mistake and not something which can be established by a long drawn process of reasoning on points on which there may be conceivably two opinions. a decision on a debatable .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 2004 (HC)

O.L. of Aryodaya Spg. and Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Charansingh Dhups ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-16-2004

Reported in : [2005]125CompCas765(Guj); [2004]56SCL133(Guj)

..... brought to a close. if a suit has to be filed it is implicit therein that it will have to go through the gamut of an appeal, second appeal, letters patent appeal and appeal to the supreme court. winding-up proceedings would drag on interminably over decades with consequent hardship to everyone. in order to avoid this situation, sub-sections (2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 2004 (HC)

Suraiya Mohammed Ikbal GulamhussaIn Vs. Assistant Collector of Customs

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-04-2004

Reported in : (2005)2GLR1033

..... evidence. the said panchnama and evidence recorded by mr. rana which have been wrongly admitted and treated as part of evidence, is not only procedural illegality but it is a patent illegality and the finding arrived at by the learned trial court and confirmed by the appellate court can be said to have been faulty and based on facts which cannot .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2004 (HC)

Pathan Umravkhan Amirkhan Vs. Shakinaben W/D. Umravmiya

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-02-2004

Reported in : (2004)3GLR489

1. widow shakinaben and her sons - original petitioners had filed special civil application no. 7239 of 1989 before this court under article 227 of the constitution of india, with following prayers made in para: 21 of the petition:(a) to quash and set aside the order of the mamlatdar and alt dtd.23.10. 1984 at annexure:c, and the order of the gujarat revenue tribunal passed in ten. b.a. 446 of 1985 dtd. 5.8.1988 at annexure:e, and also the order of the gujarat revenue tribunal in review application no. ten. c.a. 43/88 dtd. 21.7.1989 at annexure:f.(b) to confirm the judgment and order of the deputy collector, kheda dtd. 20.5.1985 in tenancy appeal no. 628 of 1984 at annexure:d, and(c) to dismiss the application filed by the respondent under sec. 70-b of the act, and(d) to remand the case to decide according to law.'2. before the learned single judge, on behalf of the original petitioners, it was submitted that the learned mamlatdar and alt, thasra, had wrongly allowed the application of the respondent by his order dated 23.10.1984, therefore, it was rightly set aside in appeal filed by them before deputy collector on 28.5.1985. but, the gujarat revenue tribunal (for short 'tribunal') wrongly allowed the revision application of the respondent and quashed and set aside the judgment and order passed by the learned deputy collector by its order dated 5.8.1988. it was submitted that the learned tribunal ought not to have exercised its revisional jurisdiction in favour of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 2004 (HC)

State of Gujarat Vs. Sankalchand P. Vachheta Since Deceased Through Hi ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-29-2004

Reported in : (2004)3GLR1983

b. j. shethna, j. 1. all these matters are disposed of by this common judgment and order, as common point is involved in all these matters. all these appeals are arising out of the judgments and orders passed by k. r. vyas, j., in special civil applications and misc. civil applications, filed in special civil applications.2. learned advocate general shri shelat appearing with learned a.g.p. shri p. r. abichandani for the appellants submitted that the appellant - state of gujarat and competent authority and the deputy collector (u.l.c.) were required to file all these appeals against the orders passed by the learned single judge in writ petitions whereby the learned single judge of this court disposed of all the writ petitions on the point of possession. he submitted that due to the connivance of the officials of the government and the a.g.ps., who appeared in the writ petitions, with the original petitioners the government has suffered loss running into crores of rupees as it has lost thousands of acres of valuable lands worth crores of rupees which were already vested in the government and the possession thereof was already taken over since long. learned advocate general also stated at the bar that because of dereliction of duty the government had also issued notices to the concerned a.g.ps., and thereafter, they were sacked as a.g.ps.. in view of the above serious allegations, we have heard learned advocate general shri shelat and other learned counsel for the respondents .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 02 2004 (HC)

Jivanbhai Shivabhai Garoda Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-02-2004

Reported in : (2005)1GLR1

..... will, in a batch of two, be staging fast unto death in order to pressurising the cisf authorities for redressal of their illegitimate demands/grievances or reversal of orders, which patently amounts to gross act of indiscipline, as envisaged in rule 51 cisf rules 1969.09. that the said group of 28 cisf personnel (optees) caused their programme of agitation published .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2004 (HC)

Commissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Devar Kavasji T. Modi Executors and Tru ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-15-2004

Reported in : (2004)187CTR(Guj)148; [2004]268ITR175(Guj)

m.s. shah, j. ;1. in this reference at the instance of the revenue, the following question is referred for our opinion in respect of asst. yr. 1981-82 :'whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the tribunal was right in law in holding that public charitable trust had been validly created by the will executed by the deceased and as such exemption under section 5(1)(i) was allowable?'2. we have heard mrs. mona bhatt, learned standing counsel for the revenue. though served, none appears for the respondent-assessee.3. late dr. t.d. edel behram had by his last will dt. 16th may, 1972, settled upon trust all his immovable and movable properties for the benefit of three institutions---ashram for lepers, ashrarn for tuberculosis patients and ashram for physically disabled and for any other charitable purpose and had appointed two persons as executors of his will. for the assessment, year under consideration i.e., 1981-82, the executors and trustees of the estate of the testator claimed exemption under, section 5(1)(iv) [ section 5(1)(i)] the wealth-tax act (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') in respect of the value of the movable and immovable properties settled upon trust. the wto as well as the dy. cwt(a) negatived the assessee's claim on the ground that since no trust deed was executed, the properties were not held under any trust for charitable purposes.the tribunal held that the trust was created under a will itself and there was no necessity of executing a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2004 (HC)

Rajkot Municipal Corporation Vs. Punjabhai Ratubhai Waghela

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-20-2004

Reported in : [2004(102)FLR338]

..... financial irregularities. award of reinstatement with full back wages was made by the labour court in his favour. writ filed by the gsrtc was dismissed and thereafter, in the letters patent appeal filed by the gsrtc, it was held that the proceedings and standard of proof required in domestic enquiry lenient than the one required in criminal trial. in the said .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //