Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: gujarat Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 49 results (0.069 seconds)

Aug 08 2006 (HC)

Wyeth Holdings Corpn. and anr. Vs. Controller General of Patents, Desi ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-08-2006

Reported in : 2007(34)PTC1(Guj)

..... reposes confidence in the judiciary as it still maintains 'judicial discipline.'9. the office is directed to send this judgment and order to respondent no. 1 the controller general of patents, designs and trade marks for his attention and necessary action, which shall be placed on the record of this case.10. coming to the merits of the case, though it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 22 2006 (HC)

Uttar Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-22-2006

Reported in : (2006)3GLR2204

..... thereto and other movable and immovable properties, cash in hand, cash at bank, investments, stocks, book debts (corporeal and incorporeal), tangible and intangible assets benefits, licenses, consents, authorities, registrations, patents, trade marks and powers of every kind, nature and description whatsoever, privileges, liberties, easements, advantages, benefits and approvals, contracts, deeds, schemes, bonds, agreements and other instruments and interest of ..... letters patent appeals. admittedly the letters patent appeals have been filed on 20.01.2005 wherein the appellant is shown as gujarat electricity board. the appeals are against common judgment and order dated 17 ..... filed by different companies seeking substitution of the name of the respective applicant-company in place of gujarat electricity board in the captioned special civil applications and letters patent appeals arising from respective special civil applications. the applicants herein are seeking substitution in place of the original respondents in the main petitions as well as in the ..... devoid of merits and is rejected.15. the prayer for substitution is, accordingly, allowed. the applicants are directed to amend the cause-title of the respective letters patent appeals. rule made absolute.16. registry to place a copy of this order in connected matters. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 23 2006 (HC)

Tushar D. Bhatt Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-23-2006

Reported in : (2007)2GLR1365

..... all seven different nature which have been adequately prescribed in the charge-sheet. 22. before parting, we may state that the scope of letters patent appeal is limited, but in the interest of justice, we have undertaken the exercise of going through the entire record of the case and considered ..... if the authority has thought it fit to pass order of dismissal, then, certainly, this court will not interfere with such order in letters patent appeal, more particularly, when the learned single judge of this court has also refused to exercise his extra-ordinary jurisdiction under article 226 of the ..... regular first appeal, but this is a letters patent appeal, the scope of which is not that wide like regular first appeal. in support of his submissions, he cited several judgments of the ..... and only penalty of dismissal and inflicted penalty of dismissal on the appellant, then this court may not interfere with such orders in this letters patent appeal, more particularly, when the learned single judge also refused to interfere in his writ jurisdiction. he also submitted that this is not a ..... penalty of dismissal. he submitted that when the disciplinary authority thought it fit to inflict maximum penalty of dismissal, then this court in letters patent appeal may not interfere with the same. he submitted that coupled with absenteeism, serious charge of using intemperate language was also found to be proved .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2006 (HC)

Sharad Bansilal Vakil Vs. Suo Motu

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-31-2006

Reported in : (2006)2GLR1707

..... therefore, submitted that the order passed by the learned single judge on 24.02.2006 is judgment within the meaning of clause 15 of the letters patent. by issuing show-cause notices to printers, publishers and editors of newspapers in appellant's application, the learned single judge has, in substance, made ..... thakore has further submitted that the appeal filed by the appellant is competent under both sections 19 of the act and clause 15 of the letters patent. the order under appeal is not an order of adjournment simpliciter, but it decided that the appellant's application shall not be heard, inter ..... remedy. an appeal shall lie to an appellate forum either under a particular statute or under the rules or under the provisions of the letters patent. under section 19 of the act, an appeal is maintainable before the appellate forum, provided the judge has exercised his contempt jurisdiction. the learned ..... editors of certain newspapers to show cause as to why they should not be held liable under the provisions of the act for publication of 'patently false' reports against the court and be awarded punishment and issuing other directions.2. it is the case of the appellant that the learned ..... remedy. an appeal shall lie to an appellate forum either under a particular statute or under the rules or under the provisions of the letters patent. under section 19 of the act, an appeal is maintainable before the appellate forum, provided the judge has exercised his contempt jurisdiction.in certain .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 2006 (HC)

Indian Institute of Management Vs. Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha and 18 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-09-2006

Reported in : [2006(110)FLR674]

..... under purported exercise of powers vested in him under section 10 of the industrial disputes act. however, exercise of such power of referring the dispute to the labour court is patently bad, illegal and without jurisdiction and contrary to the statutory provisions and hence it is nullity in the eye of law. he has further submitted that the impugned order is ..... or not to refer the dispute and for exercise of such discretion even prima facie examination of the merits of the dispute cannot be excluded. if the claim made is patently frivolous or clearly belated the government may refuse to make a reference.16. mr. nanavati has further relied upon the decision of the supreme court in the case of national .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 26 2006 (HC)

Mehul Kishorsinh Jadeja Vs. Amarjit Singh (i.A.S.) Appellate Authority ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-26-2006

Reported in : (2007)2GLR1780

..... petitioner that the authorisation committee constituted under the act, 1994 has not properly appreciated this fact and has dismissed the application vide order dated 19th may, 2006. this order is patently de hors the provision of the act, 1994. the reasons advanced in the impugned order is that vijaybhai is not a relative of the present petitioner, and therefore, application is ..... any order under sub-section (3) of section 9, an opportunity of being heard ought to be given to the petitioner. no such hearing has been given by authorisation committee, patently the order passed by authorisation committee is in breach of principle of natural justice. the order passed by the authorisation committee is an arbitrary order. if an opportunity of being .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 2006 (HC)

Guj. State Road Transport Corporation Vs. D.V. Chauhan

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-21-2006

Reported in : [2006(111)FLR1097]; (2006)2GLR889; (2006)IIILLJ196Guj

..... & s.m. soni, jj.), said in paragraphs 2 & 3 that: 2. the grievance made by the petitioner-corporation in this petition under article 227 is that the industrial tribunal had patently erred in law and had also committed error of jurisdiction in referring with the punishment imposed departmentally against the petitioner by way of stoppage of three yearly increments with future ..... set aside on the ground that the industrial court did not have jurisdiction to interfere with the punishment imposed by the disciplinary authority. the appellant challenged this order through letters patent appeal no. 1199 of 2002. the division bench found that industrial court invoked section 11a of the act for setting aside the punishment imposed by the disciplinary authority, therefore, after ..... on the simple question that which of the judgements decides the law correctly.2. before proceeding further, material facts of vankar r.r. v. gujarat state road transport corporation letters patent appeal no. 1199 of 2002 : 2005(3) llj 239 decided by division bench (coram: g.s. singhvi & anant s. dave, jj.) on 29.3.2005, referred in paragraph-2 of ..... -ordinary jurisdiction to interfere with the impugned award passed by the tribunal. petition is dismissed. above quoted order in special civil application no. 1026 of 1999 is challenged through letters patent appeal no. 513 of 1999 by the corporation. while hearing the matter, the division bench (coram: r.s. garg & ravi r. tripathi, jj) passed the following order on 10.8 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2006 (HC)

Gujarat State Marketing Federation Ltd. Vs. Sabarkantha District Co Op ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-26-2006

Reported in : (2006)3GLR2339

..... the purview of article 226 of the constitution. once the learned single judge has actually passed an order by exercising powers under article 227 of the constitution then no letters patent appeal is maintainable.14. in light of the foregoing discussion preliminary objection raised on behalf of the respondent merits acceptance. this appeal is not maintainable as the impugned judgment of ..... and 227 of the constitution and the petition has been decided on merits. but in a case where the jurisdiction is exercised under article 227 of the constitution the letters patent appeal is not maintainable.12. as already noticed hereinbefore in paragraph no. 7 of the impugned judgment the learned single judge has categorically stated that the petition is not entertained ..... referring to its earlier decision in case of lokmat newspaper (p) ltd. v. shankar prasad : (1999)iillj600sc laid down :that if a single judge exercises jurisdiction under article 226, letters patent appeal would be maintainable but if the jurisdiction is exercised under article 227 it will not be maintainable. but with an explanation that if the single judge of the high ..... it was submitted on behalf of the respondent that where the court has exercised jurisdiction under article 227 no intra court appeal is maintainable under clause 15 of the letters patent. for this, reliance has been placed on the following three decisions :[1] ishwarbhai narottambhai v. k.h.trivedi 2003(3) glr 1878, paragraph 12.[2] state of gujarat v. deenanji .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 2006 (HC)

Torrent Power Aec Ltd. Vs. Shreeji (Rakhial) Commercial Co-oprative Ho ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-01-2006

Reported in : AIR2006Guj190; (2006)3GLR1944

..... supply of power and reject an application for new connection in case of a third party auction-purchaser. 12. the reliance on the unreported decision of this court in letters patent appeal no. 691 of 2003 in the case gujarat electricity board v. jaisal silk mills pvt. ltd. (supra) also cannot carry the case of the respondent any further for the ..... or the occupier of the premises. 4. in support of the submissions reliance has been placed on an unreported order made by this court on 18th july, 2005 in letters patent appeal no. 691 of 2003 in the case of gujarat electricity board v. jaisal silk mills pvt. ltd. 5. undisputed facts are that the petitioner purchased the property of raipur ..... d.a. mehta, j. page 1255 1. this letters patent appeal challenges judgment and order dated 31st august, 2005 passed by the learned single judge in special civil application no. 15545 of 2004. the appellant herein is the original respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 03 2006 (HC)

Mohan V. Pednekar Vs. Executive Director (H.R.), Indian Oil Corporatio ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-03-2006

Reported in : (2007)2GLR1735

..... also relied on the decision of learned single judge of this court in alka synthetics v. s.e.b.i. 1997 (3) gcd 88 and the decision of the letters patent bench in s.e.b.i. v. alka synthetics : air1999guj221 in support of his submission that a place where the notice impugned in the petition is served is a part .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //