Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: gujarat Year: 2013 Page 1 of about 39 results (0.008 seconds)

Dec 26 2013 (HC)

Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Firoze M. Mogal and Anoth ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-26-2013

..... . we have also explained the term "original jurisdiction" in the context with the constitutional provisions, more particularly article 226 of the constitution of india. under the letters patent, various jurisdictions are conferred upon the high court. broadly classified, they are ordinary original civil jurisdiction, extraordinary original civil jurisdiction, appellate jurisdiction from subordinate courts, jurisdiction as ..... appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent. 2. a writ of certiorari lies in appropriate cases against the order of a tribunal or court subordinate to high court where such court or tribunal acts ..... the following answers emerge out for determining the tests which are required to be applied for considering the maintainability of an appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent: 1. the learned single judge must have exercised original writ jurisdiction as distinguished from appellate jurisdiction, revisional jurisdiction or power of superintendence in order to maintain an ..... an order of a civil court, subordinate to the high court ?131mfinal conclusion136 (a) facts necessitating the reference : it appears that the appellants of the letters patent appeal no.596 of 2008 were the original owners of an agricultural land bearing survey no.208/1 paiki admeasuring 6070 sq.meters situated in narol, district ahmedabad. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 21 2013 (HC)

Jivanbhai Z. Ghanghar Vs. Director General Sports Authority of Gujarat ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-21-2013

..... writ-petition was dismissed in limine. 31.1 the appellant challenged the correctness of the decision rendered by the learned single judge by preferring an appeal under the letters patent. the letters patent bench of three learned judges heard the appeal and delivered three concurring judgments. they were however, unanimous in holding that the learned single judge was in error in refusing ..... j.b. pardiwala, j. 1. this appeal under clause-15 of the letters patent is at the instance of an unsuccessful applicant of a special civil application and is directed against the judgment and order passed by a learned single judge of this court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2013 (HC)

Shantiniketan Education Trust and Others Vs. State of Gujarat and Othe ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-15-2013

..... , script and culture only and they can establish a institution for imparting education in any language which need not be in hindi language only. 18. with this, present letters patent appeals are partly allowed to the aforesaid extent and concerned respondent authorities are directed to consider the case of the respective petitioners institutions while considering the claim of the respective ..... impugned judgment and order passed by the learned single judge deserves to be modified. 17. in view of the above and for the reasons stated above, both the letters patent appeals are partly allowed. the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned single judge declaring that a person or group of persons belonging genuinely to the group of hindi ..... as its language, culture and script, consequently the status would be conferred upon such petitioners for such purpose as minority institutions. 3.0. the facts leading to the present letters patent appeals in nutshell are as under: 3.1. that both the appellants-original petitioners (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner institutions) are running educational institutions. that according to the petitioners ..... reported in (2010) 8 scc 49. 5.3.relying upon the above decisions and by making above submissions, it is requested to allow the present letters patent appeals. 6.0. both these letters patent appeals are opposed by shri p.k. jani, learned government pleader appearing on behalf of respondent state authority as well as shri a.d. oza, learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2013 (HC)

Hajinural Hasan Master Charitable Trust Vs. State of Gujarat and Other ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-15-2013

..... court also will have no application to the facts of the present case. by making above submissions and relying upon above decisions, it is requested to dismiss the present letters patent appeals by submitting that clause 4(g) of the government resolution dated 21.5.1994 and clause 64.3 of the grant in aid code do not violate any of ..... the constitution of india and to declare that clause 64.3 in the grant in aid code would not be applicable to aided minority institutions. 6.0. all these letters patent appeals are opposed by shri p.k. jani, learned government pleader appearing on behalf of respondent state authority. it is submitted by shri p.k. jani, learned government pleader that ..... having any application of veto or choice of another minority institution. 5.8. by making above submissions and relying upon the above decisions, it is requested to allow present letters patent appeals by quashing and setting aside the impugned common judgment and order passed by the learned single judge and to declare that clause 4(g) of the government resolution dated ..... in aid would be cut, would not violate the fundamental rights guaranteed under article 30(1) of the constitution of india. 3.0. the facts leading to the present letters patent appeals in nutshell are as under: 3.1. all the appellants herein-original petitioners are claiming to be religious / linguistic minority institutions. that all of them were directed to absorb .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 2013 (HC)

Gujarat Public Service Commission Vs. Dhanjibhai Savjibhai Maru and An ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-13-2013

..... .a. degree from gujarat vidyapith, he possesses higher qualification than what was prescribed, and, therefore, he is eligible. 5. therefore, the only question that falls for determination in these letters patent appeals is whether a candidate possessing qualification of bachelor of rural studies [b.r.s.] is eligible for the post concerned for which the qualification prescribed is a bachelors degree ..... were heard together as the question involved in both the appeals was similar. 2. letters patent appeal no. 550 is at the instance of gujarat public service commission, [gpsc hereafter], and is directed against judgment dated 3rd october 2011 passed by a learned single judge of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 21 2013 (HC)

R.R. Tiwari Vs. Director of Social Defence, Gujarat State and Another

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-21-2013

..... the order of termination was legal and valid, the special civil application could at all be disposed of. 9. thus, the first question that arises for determination in this letters patent appeal is whether the respondents were justified in passing the termination order on the sole ground that the petitioner could not clear the departmental examination within the period fixed by ..... the learned single judge, the benefit of interim order is always subject to the final decision of the proceedings. 8. the questions, therefore, that arise for determination in this letters patent appeal are, first, whether the learned single judge, in the facts of the present case, was justified in disposing of the special civil application by refusing the retiral benefits, and ..... contribution, if any, towards general provident fund and group insurance scheme. 2. being dissatisfied, the writ-petitioner has come up with the present letters patent appeal. 3. in the special civil application out of which the present letters patent appeal arises, the petitioner had made the following prayers in paragraph 21 of the writ-application: 21. the petitioner, therefore, prays that: (a ..... bhaskar bhattacharya, cj. 1. this letters patent appeal is at the instance of an unsuccessful writ-petitioner and is directed against order dated 6th february 2013 passed by a learned single judge of this court in special .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2013 (HC)

Kirit Ramnaji Thakore Vs. Vodafone Essar Gujarat Ltd Thro. Ashesh Thak ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-06-2013

..... not find any justification to stay our order passed today thereby to continue the interim relief granted earlier, for the simple reason that the letters patent appeal is allowed and thereby special civil application no. 8907 of 2010 is dismissed mainly on the ground of jurisdiction of the high court to ..... the consumer forum between such litigants may be dealt with in accordance with such judgment. 22. in view of the aforesaid facts, this letters patent appeal succeeds and is allowed. the order passed by the learned single judge dated 08.12.2010 in special civil application no. 8907 of 2010 ..... appeallabe under section 21 a (2) also. in view of such position again the reason is same, that is, special civil application and letters patent appeal are not maintainable at all before this court. 20. with reference to the above observation if we peruse the memo of special civil application it ..... such power of revision as it is provided specifically under the statute to the judicial authorities like national consumer commission and therefore, it would be patently illegal exercise of jurisdiction by the high court, if such writ petitions are entertained. 15. so far as the arguments of respondent company-service ..... this appeal. the parties should be ready for the final disposal of the case on the next date of hearing. ? therefore both the letters patent appeal as well as special civil application are before us for hearing. 7. learned counsel for the appellant has urged that against the order passed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 13 2013 (HC)

State of Gujarat Through Secretary and Another Vs. Kanubhai Kantilal R ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-13-2013

..... the affidavit filed on behalf of the applicants, on 29th june 2012, a communication was received from the office of the revenue department giving approval for preferring letters patent appeal against the impugned judgment and order and vide communication dated 30th june 2012, the appellants intimated the government pleaders office to file the appeal which, as stated ..... 2012, extended the time. [d]. in the meanwhile, on 29th june 2012, a communication was received from the office of the revenue department giving approval for preferring letters patent appeal against the impugned judgment and order and vide communication dated 30th june 2012, intimated the government pleaders office to file the appeal. [e]. thereafter, the papers were ..... 28th february 2012. in the interregnum period, the applicants had, vide communication dated 23rd january 2012 addressed a letter to the revenue department seeking approval for preferring letters patent appeal, and the revenue department, vide communication dated 14th february 2012, called for certain information pertaining to the respondents along with his service book. such details were submitted ..... february 2012 by the department concerned and the delay occurred mainly because of administrative reasons. [b]. the office of the collector thought it fit to file a letters patent appeal challenging the aforesaid order passed by the learned single judge, and, therefore, the same was forwarded for sanction and approval to the revenue department on 23rd january .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 13 2013 (HC)

Aditya Birla Insulators Vs. Commissioner of Labour and Others

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-13-2013

..... the question as to whether its powers to make a reference should be exercised under s. 10 (1) read with s. 12 (5), or not. if the claim made is patently frivolous, or is clearly belated, the appropriate govt. may refuse to make a reference. likewise, if the impact of the claim on the general relations between the employer and the ..... some direction upon the industrial tribunal, refused to interfere with the order impugned. 2. being dissatisfied, the unsuccessful applicant of the writ-application has come up with the present letters patent appeal. 3. in the special civil application no. 670 of 2013 filed by the appellants before us, the following prayers were made: (a).your lordship be pleased to issue a ..... said application would be entertained after the preliminary issue was decided by the concerned tribunal. 7. being dissatisfied, the employer has come up with the present letters patent appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent. 8. mr. nanavati, the learned senior advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant, strenuously contended before us that the learned single judge acted illegally in directing ..... bhaskar bhattacharya, j: 1. this letters patent appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent is at the instance of an employer and is directed against order dated 26th february 2013 passed by the learned single judge of this court in special civil application no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 21 2013 (HC)

Satishkumar Ramanbhai Patel and Others Vs. State of Gujarat and Others

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-21-2013

..... application filed by the appellants. 2. being dissatisfied, the writ petitioners have come up with the present appeal. 3. in the special civil application out of which the present letters patent appeal arises, the petitioners made the following prayer: 8(b) this hon'ble court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction directing the concerned respondent authorities to ..... cav judgement bhaskar bhattacharya, c.j.- 1. this letters patent appeal is at the instance of the unsuccessful writ-petitioners and is directed against an order dated 25th november 2013 passed by a learned single judge of this court by .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //