Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: gujarat Year: 2015 Page 1 of about 14 results (0.006 seconds)

Jul 27 2015 (HC)

Win Plast Ltd. Vs. Symphony Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-27-2015

..... cooler and is the genuine originator and the registered proprietor of the design of the above-referred model of air cooler. he tried to emphasise that the controller general of patents, design and trade mark has granted certificate of registration of the design of the aforesaid air cooler in favour of the original defendant which is produced at p. 307. 18 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 2015 (HC)

Bhavsar Urmiben Kanaiyalal Vs. State of Gujarat - Through The director ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-23-2015

..... india and is amenable to the writ jurisdiction of this court. the reference is answered accordingly. 12.2 in view of above, these letters patent appeals be listed before the division bench for consideration. since learned single judge has otherwise not examined the grievance of the petitioners on merits, ..... social welfare board is a state within the meaning of article 12 of the constitution of india? ? 8. let the papers of these letters patent appeals be placed before the hon'ble the chief justice for constituting an appropriate full bench. office shall obtain necessary nomination at the earliest. ?(emphasis ..... the appellant and mr. manoj n. popat, learned counsel assistant by mr. digant popat, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. in this letters patent appeal, common judgment of learned single judge dated 19th july 2011 passed in special civil application no.207 of 2011 and special civil application no.4146 ..... board reported in 1995(2) glh 339. reliance was also placed on the decision of the division bench of this court recorded on letters patent appeal no.812 of 1995. accepting the said preliminary objection, the said petition came to be dismissed as 'not maintainable'. while holding the petition ..... be gone into and therefore whether to grant any relief to the petitioners would be left to the division bench which is seized of the letters patent appeal, however, for the limited purpose, as to under what circumstances the reference is made, the following aspects are noted. 3.1 the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 2015 (HC)

State of Gujarat and Another Vs. Jain Sumit Rajeshbhai and Others

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-18-2015

..... . in our view, the learned single judge has rightly followed the decision dated 07.09.2011 passed by the division bench passed in letter patent appeal no.2986 of 2010 and connected matter and has rightly held that the service of the petitioners-respondents herein shall not be terminated till regularly ..... have jointly submitted that the learned single judge has committed error in passing the impugned judgment and order by following the decision of the letters patent appeal no.2986 of 2010. it is the next contention of learned agps for the appellants that the learned single judge has not appreciated the ..... connected matters (and similar orders in other petitions), this court, following the judgment dated 07.09.2011 passed by the division bench in letters patent appeal no.2986/2010 and allied matters, protected the petitioners by way of an ad-interim arrangement to the effect that the service conditions of ..... the learned single judge has partly allowed the said petitions. 3. the facts of these appeals are identical, therefore, we discuss only the facts of letters patent appeal no.1046 of 2014 for our convenience. 4. the facts, in brief, are that the appellant no.2-commissioner of technical education, issued an ..... these appeals are being disposed of by this common judgment and order. 2. the present appeals have been filed under clause 15 of the letters patent by the appellants-original respondent nos.1 and 2 against the judgment and orders dated 31.01.2014 and 20.02.2014 passed by the learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 2015 (HC)

Parmar Pursottambhai Somabhai Vs. State of Gujarat and Others

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-20-2015

..... barrels and then load the vehicles with kerosene. nobody would want to travel additional distance in a wrong direction with a vehicle loaded with kerosene. for all these reasons, letters patent appeal fails and is dismissed. interim relief, if any, stands vacated. at this stage, learned counsel ms.contractor for the appellant requested for stay of this judgment for a ..... pure question of fact when three authorities consistently held against the petitioner and when such findings were also approved by the learned single judge, in a limited scope of letters patent appeal, we see no reason to interfere. additionally, we also find that his further statement dated 16.7.2001 was not retracted by him upto the stage when the ..... hand, learend agp ms.maithily mehta opposed the appeal contending that three authorities concurrently held that the petitioner was involved in malpractice. the learned single judge approved such findings. letters patent appeal be therefore dismissed. mr.raju appearing for respondent no.4, who in the interim period was granted licence to run the same fair price shop, supported the government. he ..... also dismissed by the government by an order dated 26.2.2004. the petitioner thereupon approached this court. the learned single having dismissed the petition, he filed this letters patent appeal. the learned single judge held that there was material to suggest that the petitioner was attempting to dispose of the stock of kerosene unauthorizedly. he was involved in malpractice .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 29 2015 (HC)

German Tool Room Employees Union Vs. General Manager Indo German Tool ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-29-2015

..... to as tribunal ?) in reference (cgita) no.162/2012 by which the learned tribunal dismissed the said reference, the appellant herein original petitioner has preferred the present letters patent appeal. 2. that in the year 1993 applications were invited by giving an advertisement for the post of technical manpower. the respective appellants workmen applied and cleared the interview and ..... passed by the learned tribunal. 2.2 feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned single judge, the workmen have preferred the present lettes patent appeal. 3. shri j.t. trivedi, learned advocate appearing for shri k.r. mishra, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the appellants workmen has vehemently submitted that ..... vs. union of india no other submissions have been made. making above submissions and relying upon above decisions, it is requested to admit/allow the present letters patent appeal. 4. present letters patent appeal is opposed by shri b.n. doctor, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the contesting respondents. it is submitted that in the facts and circumstances of ..... appearing on behalf of the concerned workmen shall be applicable to the facts of the case on hand. making above submissions, it is requested to dismiss the present letters patent appeal. 5. heard learned advocates appearing for respective parties at length. we have perused the judgment and award passed by the learned tribunal dismissing the reference as well as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 2015 (HC)

The Executive Director/Basin Manager Oil and Natural Gas Corporation L ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-29-2015

..... on record. 8. in view of the aforesaid observations and discussion, the appeal preferred by the ongc viz. letters patent appeal nos. 797 and 798 of 2013 deserve to be dismissed, hence, dismissed. the appeal preferred by the employeesunion being letters patent appeal no. 290 of 2013 can be said as meritless and hence, the same is also dismissed. considering the facts .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 16 2015 (HC)

Ashoksinh Pratapsinh Sarvaiya and Another Vs. State of Gujarat and Oth ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-16-2015

..... this matter with special leave petition no.2783327834 of 2012. 8. it is contended by the petitioner that benefits conferred upon another workmen viz. rajubhai naranbhai and ors. wherein letters patent appeal has been dismissed and replying upon this it has been contended that the petitioners who are similar situated should be given the benefit as like others. it is submitted ..... .l.h. 147]. the decision rendered in letters patent appeal in case of workman rajubhai naranbhai, the state has preferred special leave petition before the honble apex court which has been numbered as slp no.1852018521 of 2012 and ..... of 60% backwages. the award has been therefore modified to that extent. the order passed in sca no.8530 of 2002 has been challenged by way of letters patent appeal. the said letters patent appeal has been disposed of considering that appeal is not maintainable in view of the decision rendered in gustaji dhanjisha bhuriwala vs. nevil bamansha buhariwala [2011 (2) g ..... the present petitions under the contempt of courts act is the alleged breach and noncompliance to the order passed in special civil application read with the order passed in letters patent appeal, whereby the reinstatement of the workmen concerned in service with continuity was ordered be made. 2. it appears that pending the petitions the petitioners workmen were reinstated in service .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 2015 (HC)

Ravjibhai Rajput Vs. State of Gujarat and Others

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Sep-14-2015

..... as the petitioner had not worked for the said period. the petitioner has placed reliance upon the judgment rendered by the hon'ble division bench in letters patent appeal no.635 of 2013 however the petitioner has not been able to point out a specific direction by the hon'ble division bench to grant the ..... on the following averments made in the affidavit-in-reply: 7. it is respectfully submitted that it would be pertinent to quote hereinbelow paragraph 24 of letters patent appeal no.635 of 2013. for the aforesaid reasons, we find merit in this appeal, and are of the opinion that the same deserves to be allowed ..... of the bhuj museum, w.e.f. 25.07.2002, is illegal and arbitrary. 7. mr. hasurkar submitted that in the judgment rendered in the letters patent appeal, the division bench has taken the view that the petitioner should have been regularized in the first instance as there was a vacant full time post of ..... discretion to be exercised depending on the facts of each case. ? 4. it appears that after the order was passed by the division bench in the letters patent appeal, the state government refused to regularize the services of the petitioner w.e.f. 25.07.2002 and pay him the consequential benefits of the same. 5 ..... to such regularization of the petitioner's services from 25.07.2002 in light of judgment passed by this hon'ble court dated 22/08/2013 in letters patent appeal no.635 of 2013; (b) the hon'ble court be pleased to award interest at the rate of 12% on the amount that has remained .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 12 2015 (HC)

Arunbhai R. Naik Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-12-2015

..... of discharge was by way of a punishment and the assessee was entitled to reinstatement of his services. the employer challenged the order in letters patent appeal before a division bench of this court, which held that the employer - gujarat state fertilizer company limited was not a state or authority under ..... challenged the premature termination of his services before this high court and succeeded before the learned single judge. during the pendency of the letters patent appeal preferred by the employer against the judgment of the learned single judge, the parties arrived at a settlement under which the amount in question ..... the assessee's services was terminated by the company along with four other officers. in appeal, the high court in its judgment in letter patent appeal no.375 of 1985 with civil application no.3962 of 1985, it is stated that since the parties have arrived at an agreement the ..... in view of the discharge of his services under rule 44. while the assessee succeeded in the writ petition filed by him, the letters patent appeal preferred by the employer came to be allowed. therefore, the discharge of the assessee's services by the employer attained finality. however, during ..... the pendency of the letters patent appeal, the assessee and the employer arrived at a settlement, in terms whereof, the amount was to be computed in the manner stated therein .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 24 2015 (HC)

Chief Manager Vs. Anil Popatlal Ghelani and Another

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-24-2015

..... industrial or labour court, then such court should not enter into the determination on such issue. however, it cannot be ignored that such judgment has already been challenged in letters patent appeal no. 962/2014, which though was initially entertained, surprisingly the same has been summarily dismissed by judgment and order dated 20/1/2014 on technical ground and, therefore, the ..... in civil application no. 9729 of 2006 in s.c.a. no. 1376 of 2004 by this high court v dholka nagar palika v/s. dasrath rabari rendered in letters patent appeal no. 1756 of 2004 by this high court vi mackinon mackenzie and company ltd. v/s. mackinon employees union reported in 2015 [2] llj 151 [sc] vii bhuvnesh kumar .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //