Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: guwahati Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 31 results (0.027 seconds)

Sep 04 2002 (HC)

Duken Hengra Tea Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Sep-04-2002

..... or other narcotic drugs or other narcotic other than those medicines which are exclusively ay-urvedic, unani, sidha or homeopathic12 1/2 % adv.10% of the basic duty chargeableexplanation i. - 'patent or proprietary medicines' means any drug or medicinal preparation, in whatever form, for use in the internal or external treatment of, or for the prevention of ailments in human beings ..... 'as necessary now as it was when lord coke reported heydon's case.' the rule was reaffirmed by earl of halsbury in eastman photographic material company v. comptroller general of patents, designs and trade marks, 1898 ac 571 in the following words:'my lords, it appears to me that to construe the statute in question, it is not only legitimate but .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2002 (HC)

Manager (in-charge), Kuhum Tea Estate Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-05-2002

..... finding that the assistant labour commissioner, jorhat, had no function to direct a workman to be punctual in his duty and that therefore, the charge no. 3, was absurd being patently erroneous and the award having been vitiated thereby, it is liable to be interefered with. the evidence adduced before the learned court below, having conclusively established all the charges against ..... labour court in exercise of the powers under article 226 of the constitution of india, isbynow well settled. unless, the conclusions recorded by the labour court are ascertained to the patently bad and against the evidence of record or suffer from obvious errors of law, the same are not liable to be overturned. a writ court is not supposed to exercise .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 2002 (HC)

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Member, Mact and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-12-2002

r.s. mongia, c.j.1. the brief facts giving rise to the latters patent appeal at the behest of the insurance company may be noticed :2. respondent mustt. piarjan bibi preferred a claim petition before the mact, kamrup, guwahati in the year 1995 claiming .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 21 2002 (HC)

Sashi Kanta Sarma Vs. District Judge and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : May-21-2002

..... of the parties with regard to any controversy. that being so, it can be safely held that such orders are not judicial orders but only the administrative orders. as it patently appears that the court has acted under the scheme which provides for amendment or alteration of the scheme empowering the district judge to act on its own motion, in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 2002 (HC)

Assam Jatiya Vidyalaya and anr. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Nov-25-2002

..... offers of the respective tenderers in the light of the technical features of the project, ordinarily this court would leave the decision of the technical committee undisturbed unless there are patent errors and perversities apparent on the face of the record. the writ court always considers it inexpedient and inappropriate to sit in judgment over the views of the experts. if .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 2002 (HC)

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Member, M.A.C.T. and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-12-2002

r.s. mongia, c.j.1. the brief facts giving rise to the letters patent appeal at the behest of the insurance company may be noticed:2. respondent mustt. piarjan bibi preferred a claim petition before the mact, kamrup, guwahati in the year 1995 claiming .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 2002 (HC)

Pinku Trading Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Bank of Baroda and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : May-29-2002

..... clause 15 of the letters patent. accordingly, in the present case, we are to determine as to whether the provisions of order xxxiii of cpc have been complied with. rule 2 of order xxxiii of cpc ..... that provisions relating to suit by indigent person will be applicable in respect of appeals filed by an indigent person. the present appeal is under clause 15 of the letters patent and our considered opinion is that the provision as contained in order xxxiii of cpc read with order xliv of cpc will also be applicable in an appeal filed under ..... . 1. heard mr. s. deb (jr.), the learned counsel appearing on be-half of the applicant and also mr. pradip deb ray, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. a letters patent appeal being l.p.a. no. 5 of 2001 has been sought to be filed by the applicant/petitioner as appellant against the judgment and decree dated 15-5-2001 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 2002 (HC)

State of Mizoram Vs. Pu Shvanhnu at

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jan-08-2002

..... erred inasmuch as it directed the state to pay pension at the rate of rs. 500 per month, even to the heirs of the deceased in their own right. this patent error - which was perhaps due to inadvertence -could and should have been sue motu corrected by the high court in the exercise of its inherent jurisdiction even after the expiry ..... are required to consider the case of compensation to the village chief in accordance with law and not in violation of any law. it is an innocuous order without any patent error. 8. in view of what has been stated above, we do not consider that there is any ground for review of the appellate order dated 8.12.1999. 9 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 2002 (TRI)

Amit Sahai, Ifs Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-13-2002

Reported in : (2003)(1)SLJ152CAT

..... order of transfer was made bonafide in the public interest. it was also contended that the power to transfer is totally vested on the employer and unless the order is patently malafide or unlawful, such order is not the subject matter of judicial review.4. we have heard mr. b.k. sharma, learned sr. counsel assisted by mr.s. sarma and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 2002 (TRI)

Sh. Fanai Pahnuna Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-01-2002

Reported in : (2003)(1)SLJ76CAT

..... .........." (para 13-046; 13-047) 16. from the conspectus it thus emerges that the decision maker in the decision making process has taken into consideration as facts, something which was patently wrong; perversity writ large. it has misunderstood law as well as the fact upon which the decision is based.admittedly, materials those were taken as a whole did not support .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //