Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: income tax appellate tribunal itat kolkata Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 3 results (0.077 seconds)

Oct 16 2002 (TRI)

Graphite India Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-16-2002

Reported in : (2003)86ITD384(Kol.)

..... the exclusive benefits of and absolute right to all inventions, improved process of manufacture, designs, secret materials, formulas of mixing, improvements in addition to or further inventions relating to the patents or processes of manufacture or products manufactured or being developed by the company or otherwise relating to the business and affairs of the company which you may produce, make, invent ..... any such improvement, invention or additions as the company shall think fit. 7. you shall agree that any and all improvements, intentions and discoveries, whether or not capable of being patented, which you may make either alone or in conjunction with others during your appointment hereunder relating to or in anyway pertaining to or connection with any of the products of ..... of the company, execute and sign any and all applications, assignments and other instruments which the company may deem necessary or advisable in order to apply for and obtain letters patent design registration or other forms of protection for the said improvements, inventions and discoveries in such countries as the company may direct and to vest in the company alone or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 2002 (TRI)

Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-16-2002

..... 'ble supreme court, in volkart bros' case (supra) that in order for a mistake to be covered by the scope of section 154, a mistake must be an obvious and patent mistake and not something which can be established by a long drawn process of reasoning on points on which there may conceivably by two opinions. in other words, in case .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 2002 (TRI)

Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-16-2002

Reported in : (2003)85ITD745(Kol.)

..... honble supreme court, in volkart brothers case (supra) that in order for a mistake to be covered by the scope of section 154, a mistake must be an obvious and patent mistake and not something which can be established by a long drawn process of reasoning on points on which there may conceivably by two opinions. in other words, in case .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //