Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: jammu and kashmir Year: 1979 Page 1 of about 3 results (0.011 seconds)

Jan 19 1979 (HC)

Dr. Yash Paul Gupta Vs. Dr. S.S. Anand and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Jan-19-1979

Reported in : AIR1980J& K16

kotwal, j. 1. this appeal under the letters patent is directed against an order of a learned judge of this court, dismissing the appellant's writ petition, and upholding the order passed against him by the estates officer, evicting .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 1979 (HC)

Brij Mohan Bakhshi Vs. Amar Nath Bakhshi and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Jan-08-1979

Reported in : AIR1980J& K54

..... the petition.3. a preliminary objection has been raised on behalf of the respondents that the order rejecting the application is not judgment and, therefore, no appeal under the letters patent is maintainable. the application has not disposed of any part of the case and has not decided any rights in the suit.4. the question whether an interlocutory judgment can ..... be subject of appeal under letters patent has been the subject matter of some of' the decisions of this court as also of other indian high courts. the balance of the authority is in favour of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 1979 (HC)

Jagtu and ors. Vs. Badri and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Mar-30-1979

Reported in : AIR1980J& K1

mian jalal-ud-din, c.j. 1. these bunch of cases in the nature of appeals, revisions, and references have been referred to the full bench and raise common questions of law of general importance relating to interpretation of section 19 (3) (e) and section 25 of the jammu and kashmir agrarian reforms act of 1976, (act no. xvii of 1976), for short, to be referred to as the 'act of 1976'. it has been debated that by virtue of the operation of the above mentioned sections, jurisdiction of civil courts to decide all causes relating to land as defined in the act of 1976 is barred as the law aims at completely ousting the jurisdiction of civil courts from taking cognizance of all such cases. it will be appropriate to give a brief sketch of the facts of each case:(i) jagtu v. badri and ors. is l. p. a. no. 14 of 1972 against the judgment and decree dated 29-11-1971 of jaswant singh, j. (as his lordship then was). the appeal arises out of a suit for possession of agricultural land based on the right of prior purchase. the plaintiff claimed the right of prior purchase on the ground that he was the tenant of a part of the land. a question has been raised in the appeal that because of section 25 read with section 19 (3) (e) of the act of 1976, the jurisdiction of the civil courts to settle, decide, or deal with any question or to determine any matter arising out of the act of 1976, is barred. the jurisdiction to decide such matters vests exclusively with the authority appointed and, .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //