Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: jammu and kashmir Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 70 results (0.015 seconds)

Jul 27 2004 (HC)

Ganesh Dass Vs. Kuldeep Raj

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Jul-27-2004

Reported in : 2005(1)JKJ555

..... too is beside the point. the case hinges upon the question as to how the seemingly conflicting provisions of the constitution act of 1996, the letters patent of this court and those of the civil courts act can be allowed to co-exist in harmony with each other, without negativing the effect of ..... high court. to this extent alone the provisions of section 20 of the civil courts act have been modified both by the constitution act and letters patent of this court. in other words the position is that whereas the district judge continues to be competent to hear and try original suits of any ..... rupees twenty thousand and above in the high court enjoined by section 56(2) of the constitution act, 1996, and the clause 10 of the letters patent cannot by any stretch of imagination be taken to rob the district court of its jurisdiction to try and determine them. reference in this connection may ..... lordship then was) expressed the view after noticing the provisions contained in section 56 of the constitution of jammu and kashmir act and clause 10 of letters patent rules as follows:'the above quoted provisions which are identical consist of two parts. the first part is in the nature of an enabling provision. it ..... the jurisdiction to hear the determine suits carrying value of rs. 20,000/- and onwards in view of the provision contained in clause 10 of letters patent and section 56(2) of the j&k; constitution act of 1956 which was repealed by the coming into force of constitution of jammu and kashmir .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 2004 (HC)

Mukhtar-ul-aziz Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Jun-07-2004

Reported in : 2005(2)JKJ583,(2005)IILLJ1059J& K

..... by observations/findings regarding contractual nature of his employment, terminable at one month's notice by either side, the petitioner preferred appeal in hand under clause 12 of the letters patent. the dispute being same and the appeal arising from the writ petition itself, both writ petition and appeal were taken up for hearing together.2. the case of the petitioner ..... may not be made an instance for making similar appointment in future, lest it may only undermine confidence of the people in the recruitment system.39. coming to the letters patent appeal, as seen above, the appeal is directed against the finding of the learned single judge regarding contractual nature of petitioner's appointment. no exception can be taken to such ..... decision, it cannot be the subject matter of any appeal. the appeal therefore, must be held as not maintainable.40. in the result, both the writ petition and the letters patent appeal are dismissed but without any order as to costs.

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 10 2004 (HC)

Vikas Jandial and ors. Vs. State of J and K Through Finance Department ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Jun-10-2004

Reported in : 2004(3)JKJ66

..... of object to chance. the excise commissioner had, therefore, no power to follow the procedure of its own, and the procedure adopted by draw of lots, in my opinion, is patently without jurisdiction. the government in terms of its policy had clearly provided its procedure for grant of licences, i.e., consideration of the applicants on merits with a view to ..... general public for consideration in the selection process for the grant of fresh licences for retail sale of liquor for 205 locations in the jammu and kashmir state, which is patently illegal and is violative of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution. in such event, the entire process of selection by draw of lots is unfair, discriminatory and is tainted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 2004 (HC)

Sunil Kumar Gupta Vs. State of J and K, Through Director of Litigation ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Apr-19-2004

Reported in : 2004(2)JKJ267

..... be built on the general administration department and the petitioner expressed all such apprehensions for his being dislodged through the medium of proper applications and also appeal under the letters patent rules. despite that, the general administration department acted contrary to their own decisions and official records and issued government order no. 508-gad of 2002 dated 19.3.2002 for ..... , which was granted to him during the pendency of the writ petition. in its view, since the decision of the writ petition and passing of the order by the letters patent bench, there has been subsequent development, i.e., some order has been passed by the government, which order was yet to be brought on the record of this case. therefore .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 2004 (HC)

Ganesh Oil Mills Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Jul-22-2004

Reported in : 2005(1)JKJ443

..... decision, it may be pointed out was rendered prior to the decision in hans raj and sons case.22. in the result, the writ petitions as well as the letters patent appeals are allowed. the impugned notification sro 80 dated 30-3-2000 is quashed and the respondents are restrained form giving effect to the provisions of section 3(5) of ..... s.n. jha, c.j.1. the dispute in this batch of writ petitions and letters patent appeals relates to vires of sub-section (5) of section 3 of the j&k; levy of tolls act, samvat 1995 (1938 a.d), (hereinafter referred to as the act) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 15 2004 (HC)

Pawan Kumar Sharma and Tariq Ahmed Mughal Vs. Romesh Kumar Samotra and ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Oct-15-2004

Reported in : 2005(1)JKJ103

..... , on caveat and mr. rajinder singh jamwal, learned counsel for their respective respondents, in extenso, in both the appeals. we have also perused the record meticulously.2. both these letters patent appeals arising out of the same judgment and order dated 22-9-2004 passed by learned single judge in batch of writ petitions, bearing swp no. 1436/2000, entitled s ..... of the constitution of india. we, therefore, do not find any ground to interfere with the well-reasoned and lucid judgment prepared by the learned single judge, in these letters patent appeals.14. for what has been stated and discussed above, in our opinion, there is no merit in these lpas and the same are, accordingly, dismissed with connected cmps, and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 2004 (HC)

Raj Kumar Sharma [Dr.] Vs. State and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Apr-16-2004

Reported in : 2005(1)JKJ522

..... the findings of the learned single judge and the directions issued at the appropriate place later in this judgment. persons aggrieved by the said judgment including the appellant preferred letters patent appeals. the appeal preferred by the appellant was registered as lpa no. 8/1991. on the prayer of the appellant, his appeal was segregated while other appeals were disposed of ..... s.n. jha, c.j.1. the dispute in this letters patent appeal arising from swp no. 153/1988 relates to appointment on the post of lecturer in the department of medicine, government medical college, jammu.2. the appellant filed the writ .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 05 2004 (HC)

State of J and K Vs. D.N. Kotwal and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Jun-05-2004

Reported in : 2004(3)JKJ376

..... / chairman for pensionary benefits or for any purpose, whatsoever, under the rules which governed his service at the time of his superannuation.28. in view of the above, this letters patent appeal is allowed. the judgment impugned is set-aside. consequently, the writ petition filed by the respondents is dismissed.29. no order as to costs ..... v.k. jhanji, j.1. this letters patent appeal arises out of judgment and order dated 29th december, 2000 passed in writ petition, owp no. 3/94, whereby the learned single judge has held all the members, including .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 09 2004 (HC)

Farooq Ahmad Mir Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Nov-09-2004

Reported in : 2005(1)JKJ181

..... appellant was dismissed from service without enquiry. he filed writ petition, swp no. 628/1992. the petition having been dismissed by the learned single judge, he has come in letters patent appeal.3. the short facts of the case are that on 5th april, 1991, while he was posted as a guard at the telephone exchange ishber guptganga,. nishat, he proceeded ..... judicial review it is not a fit case for exercise of power in favour of the appellant. the learned single judge declined to interfere in the matter and in letters patent appeal this court does not find any ground to interfere.22. in the result finding no merit, we dismiss the appeal, but without any order as to costs.23. judgment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2004 (HC)

State of Jammu and Kashmir and ors. Vs. Maharaj Krishan Bhat and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Apr-22-2004

Reported in : (2005)ILLJ1029J& K

..... . so the impugned order dated january 6, 2003 being arbitrary and contrary to the scheme/rules, the direction issued by learned single judge does not warrant any interference in letters patent jurisdiction by this court.6. on behalf of the appellants it was submitted that the regularisation can be made only against a post and as the posts in question were ..... seven years of service and to give consequential benefits thereof to them with effect from the said dates. the state of jammu and kashmir and others have come in letters patent appeal against the said order of learned single judge.4. before going into the merits of the case of the parties, the relevant provisions of sro 64 of 1994 may .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //