Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: jharkhand Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 62 results (0.004 seconds)

May 09 2002 (HC)

Sarveshwar Nath Singh Vs. Jharkhand Intermediate Education Council and ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-09-2002

Reported in : 2002(50)BLJR1251

..... of the council being totally alien to the aforesaid act, the same being de hors the act and clearly being contrary to its specific and express provisions, is wholly and patently erroneous and illegal. not merely a technical illegality has been committed, but even the legislative intent has been defeated and frustrated by the- government of jharkhand in not appointing the ..... order1. in this petition, amongst various other reliefs, the petitioner claims that the respondents have committed a patent illegality in appointing an administrator for the jharkhand intermediate education council, because according to the petitioner, law does not contemplate such an appointment of an administrator.2. mr. pandey neeraj .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 15 2002 (HC)

Binay Kumar Sinha Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-15-2002

Reported in : 2002(50)BLJR2223

..... background and based on the aforesaid observations that we have come to the conclusion that in this case a writ of quo-warranto against shri shahdeo who admittedly, clearly and patently suffers from the disqualification to hold the public office of chairman state board, can be issued by us. writ of quo-warranto is a writ which lies against the person .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 2002 (HC)

Ramadhar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Feb-11-2002

Reported in : 2002(50)BLJR1120; [2002(94)FLR688]

..... the basic premise that the appellant was, in fact, removed from service and that this removal was because of an act of misconduct alleged against him. the removal, therefore, was patently by way of imposition of a major penalty upon him and this penalty undoubtedly would fall either under clause vii or under clause viii of rule 2 of 1935 rules ..... of the said rule 2 in as much as the order by which the appellant was removed from service in the facts and circumstance of the case was purely and patently penal in nature, also because admittedly the appellant was removed from service by way of his being awarded a punishment for an act of misconduct and that this cast a ..... orderthe court1. this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent has been filed by the appellant against the judgment dated 30th july, 2001 passed by a learned single judge of this court in w.p.(s) no. 3369 of 2001 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 2002 (HC)

Birendra Prasad Sinha Vs. Bihar State Housing Board and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-01-2002

Reported in : [2006(1)JCR25(Jhr)]

hari shankar prasad, j.1. this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent is directed against the judgment and order dated 22.8.1996 passed in 'cwjc no. 1271/96 (r), whereby and whereunder the learned single judge has dismissed the foresaid writ .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 2002 (HC)

Lal Babu Singh Vs. Coal India Limited and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-04-2002

Reported in : (2003)ILLJ779Jhar

m.y. eqbal, j.1. this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent is directed against the judgment dated 23.4.1992 passed in cwjc no. 1389/91 (r), whereby the learned single judge dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner-appellant. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 10 2002 (HC)

Samaresh Singh Etc. Vs. Syed Azmat HussaIn and ors. Etc.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-10-2002

Reported in : 2002(50)BLJR1359

..... filed, it has been submitted that after the division bench had passed the aforesaid order on 21.12.2001 the appellant started functioning in a manner which was totally and patently against and de hors the memorandum of association, articles. rules, regulations and the principles of fair play, objectivity, equity etc.13. we list hereinbelow some of the admitted facts which ..... continue against him and be taken to its logical conclusion in accordance with law and on its merits. admittedly, because the termination order dated 1.3.2002 was also passed patently illegally, we direct that its operation shall stay in the meanwhile.20. we have taken note of mr. m.s. anwar's submission that a writ petition, being w.p .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2002 (HC)

Tara Dutta, Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board Through Its Chairman ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Dec-03-2002

Reported in : [2003(1)JCR341(Jhr)]

..... as 'the bseb') shall pay the benefits.3. the aforesaid judgment of the learned single judge has been challenged by both the boards i.e. jseb and bseb in letters patent appeal no. 355 of 2002 and other analogous cases. in the said case, a division bench of this court vide order dated 26th september, 2002 while passed certain directions on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 2002 (HC)

Safir Mian Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Feb-27-2002

Reported in : 2002(50)BLJR1192; 2002CriLJ3284

..... crimes aforesaid attributed to this petitioner were actually the crimes which could bring the accused-petition under the definition of anti-social element under the act and his activities has patent danger in the public order. therefore, the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner was that there is no application of mind by the detaining authority. rather the petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2002 (HC)

Satya Narayan Pandey and Ors. and Citizens' and Cause Vs. the State of ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Dec-03-2002

Reported in : [2005(4)JCR132(Jhr)]

..... on the subject.10. coming to the question relating to the non-fixation of any upper age limit, even as an one-time arrangement, we find that this also is patently contrary to sound public policy. it is commonly known that in all government appointments, the state fixes lower and upper age limits and that the relevant recruitment rules insist on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 2002 (HC)

Dr. Narendra Narayan Roy and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Feb-01-2002

Reported in : 2002(50)BLJR668; (2003)ILLJ5Jhar

orderthe court 1. this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent is directed against an order dated 7.1.2002 passed by a learned single judge of this court whereby, relying upon an earlier judgment of a single bench of this .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //