Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: karnataka Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 35 results (0.006 seconds)

Oct 20 2005 (HC)

V.V. Sivaram and ors. Vs. Foseco India Limited

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-20-2005

Reported in : [2006]133CompCas160(Kar); 2006(1)KarLJ386

..... show that they were to maintain confidentiality with regard to information received during their employment. therefore, the trial court found a prima facie case for the plaintiff. the patent application of the plaintiff pending with the authorities was held inconsequential in the trial court holding that the relief of injunction is based on a breach of agreement regarding ..... wing engaged in developing newer processes and innovative technologies. the plaintiff is part of the foseco group of companies, which carry a worldwide reputation. the group, including the plaintiff, holds patents for several products. one such product is 'turbostop', which is a specially designed and engineered 'contoured impact pad' (cip). till the invention of 'turbostop' the normal process in ..... the plaintiff introduced turbostop in the indian market during 2000 similar products were being sold worldwide. the plaintiff has not produced any indian patent. the existence of a foreign patent in the name of the plaintiffs foreign patent is irrelevant.4. the trial court has found that the contention of defendants 1 and 2 that they had not received information ..... 3 again has his own status as an independent contractor who was engaged by the plaintiff and the contract terminated midway. it is contended that patents are strictly territorial and existence of foreign patents is of no relevance. in any event the plaintiff is existing from the steel operation business and the fact that services of many of its .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2005 (HC)

Diebold Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-31-2005

Reported in : ILR2005KAR2210; [2006]144STC59(Kar)

..... 27, 1967 by barclay's bank. this instance of the invention is credited to john shephered-birron, although george simjian registered patents in new york, jsa, in the 1930's and don wetzel and two other engineers from ducted registered a patent on june 4, 1973.16. atm's are found at banks, grocery stores, shopping racks, convenience stores and some times .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 08 2005 (HC)

Chennachari and ors. Vs. S. Saroja and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-08-2005

Reported in : ILR2005KAR4817; 2006(5)KarLJ181

..... the subordinate courts and tribunals within their bounds. whenever it is noticed that a court or tribunal within the state has exceeded its jurisdiction, acts without jurisdiction or in a patently illegal manner, it is the duty of the high court to correct it to ensure that the court or the tribunal acts within its bounds and it matters very little .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 18 2005 (HC)

Jeelani Mosque Committee (R) Vs. the Shimoga Urban Development Authori ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-18-2005

Reported in : ILR2005KAR5819; 2006(2)KarLJ579

..... site in question as reserved for public, without disclosing that the site is reserved for community hall. it is apparent that the misdescription of the reservation of the site is patently to suit the interests and convenience of the 2nd respondent. the condition to establish a school with kannada as medium of institution, for the allotment of the site in favour .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 2005 (HC)

Deccan Asian Infrastructure (Mauritius) Inc. Vs. Bpl Communications Li ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-13-2005

Reported in : 2005(2)ARBLR450(Kar); 2005(3)KarLJ143

..... cannot be sacrificed. that giving limited jurisdiction to the court for giving finality to the award and resolving the dispute by speedier method would be much more frustrated by permitting patently illegal award to operate and such award has to be set at naught as otherwise it would promote injustice. what could be gathered from the several judgments cited before us ..... that the arbitral tribunal in its partial award grossly misinterpreted the repugnant provisions of the shareholders' agreement and misapplied the principles governing the doctrine of repugnancy to arrive at their patently erroneous conclusions. the first respondent further contended that the partial award by the majority of the members of the arbitral tribunal exhibited ..... patent error apparent on the face of the award and on that ground alone deserves to be set aside as being contrary to the public policy of india as it is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2005 (HC)

J. Ashoka Vs. University of Agricultural Sciences and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-17-2005

Reported in : ILR2006KAR768; 2006(1)KarLJ258

..... unsuccessful petitioner.4. learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner sri ravivarma kumar has contended that the resolution passed by the board of regents selecting the third respondent suffers from patent illegality inasmuch as totally irrelevant materials are taken into consideration and the case of the petitioner is not at all considered while resolving to select the third respondent who is ..... rank list to get appointment against the available vacancies, had b.ed. candidates been excluded from the selections. the impugned judgment of the division bench is both illegal, inequitable and patently unjust13. thus, it is to be seen that what is frowned upon the extension of equitable considerations contrary to law and contrary to the terms of the advertisement. the b .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 2005 (HC)

Arecanut Processing and Sale Co-operative Society Limited Vs. Mohammad ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-19-2005

Reported in : ILR2006KAR120; 2005(6)KarLJ500

..... and to see that they do their duty in a legal manner. it is also well-settled that for preventing grave and serious miscarriage of justice resulting from following a patently erroneous procedure or contravention of basic principles of justice and fair-play, the supervisory jurisdiction conferred on courts by article 227 of the constitution remains available to the courts. it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 2005 (HC)

Kalpatharu Hotels and ors. Vs. Mysore Mahanagara Palike

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-06-2005

Reported in : ILR2005KAR3547; 2005(5)KarLJ103

..... the commercial building upon the property in question, strange is the method adopted by the respondent while cancelling the sanction of plan, annexure-m and licence annexure-n. it is patent from the factual matrix, that the respondent-authority having failed in its resolve annexure 'h', to repossess the property by cancelling the sale in favour of the vendor of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 01 2005 (HC)

Dr. Y. Nagappa Vs. P. Shanumakanagouda and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-01-2005

Reported in : AIR2005Kant304; IV(2005)BC119; ILR2005KAR1687

..... maintainable. the court below, without affording an opportunity of hearing the plaintiff and without making reference to section 12 of the limitation act has dismissed the suit. the error is patent on record. hence, i pass the following order:-the civil revision petition is allowed and the impugned order dated 29.1.2005 made in o s no. nil/05 on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 2005 (HC)

Rajesh Exports Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Represented by Its Sec ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-29-2005

Reported in : ILR2005KAR5754

..... government merely because it feels that another policy decision would have been fairer or wiser or more scientific or logical. the court an interfere only if the policy decision is patently arbitrary, discriminatory or malafide. in matters of trade or commerce or economic policy, the wisdom of the government must be respected and courts cannot lightly interfere with the same unless .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //