Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: kolkata Page 100 of about 3,457 results (0.013 seconds)

Jun 17 1975 (HC)

Jokai (Assam) Tea Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Bhawani Shankar Bagaria

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1976Cal18

..... also an alternative claim. there are some further additional claims. the suit was filed at calcutta after having obtained leave under clause 12 of the letters patent.2. leave under clause 12 of the letters patent was obtained by averments made in paragraphs 5, 7 and 10 of the plaint. in paragraph 5 it is alleged that that the letter dated 15th .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 02 1997 (HC)

M/S. Ranigunj Chemicals Works Vs. Learned Judge, 4th Industrial Tribun ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1998)1CALLT32(HC),1998(1)CHN115

..... even within the range of order 47, rule 1 of the code of civil procedure that apart from execution discharge or satisfaction of a decree if the controversial decree is patently vitiated by inherent lack of jurisdiction of the court concerned to be in seisin of the controversy, then, on the score of the same the point of nullity is covered ..... award passed exparte'of which there is not iota of doubt. the learned advocate of the concerned respondent has tried to contend that it is a no dispute award which patently is a nullity. assuming the same to be vitiated by elements of nullity but the adjudicating authority in seisin of the controversy is not entitled to in law to enter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 04 1978 (HC)

Nanda Lal Agarwalla Vs. Rameswar Lal Sharma

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1979Cal30

..... on the decision reported in : (1973)77callt613(hc) (sriram pasrisha v. jagannath sen). this decision was reversed by the letters patent bench in the decision reported in (1975) 1 cal lj413 (jagannath sen v. sriram pasrisha). the decision of the letters patent bench was affirmed by the supreme court in a case reported in air 1978 sc 2335 (sri ram pasrisha v .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 1932 (PC)

Bijoy Krishna Basu and ors. Vs. Benode Behari Pramanik and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1932Cal479

..... suit if they do not prefer to take their chance by waiting.5. in my judgment the view taken by the learned judge must be supported and the two letters patent appeals must be dismissed with costs.c.c. ghose, j.6. i agree. ..... rankin, c.j.1. these are two letters patent appeals brought by leave from a decision of my learned brother pearson., j., in two second appeals. the same question arises in each case. there was a jama of 5 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 1936 (PC)

Sm. Shahedan Bibi Vs. Mir Ali and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1937Cal31

..... is that this appeal is dismissed but without costs throughout.12. prayer for leave to appeal under section 15 of the letters patent is granted.l.p. appeal.13. this is an appeal under section 15 of the letters patent against the judgment of our learned brother, mr. r.c. mitter, j. and it has arisen out of a proceeding in execution .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 1966 (HC)

John Herbert and Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pranay Kumar Dutta

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1966]36CompCas485(Cal),70CWN516

..... an adjudication on an application which is nothing more than a step towards obtaining a final adjudication in the suit is not a judgment within the meaning of the letters patent. in my view the order of refusal to stay is nothing more than a step towards obtaining a final adjudication in the winding up proceedings.12. it was however argued ..... and as such fit to be restrained by injunction or stay is not, in my view, a ' judgment ' within the meaning of the expression under clause 15 of the letters patent. in terms of the judgment of couch c. j. in justices of the peace for calcutta v. oriental gas company, (1872) bengal law reports 433, the adjudication does not affect .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 1958 (HC)

Narendra Nath Dutt Vs. Jitendra Nath Dutt and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1959Cal62

..... contended that the order, although an order allowing an amendment of written statement, was a judgment and, therefore, an appeal from it would lie under clause 15 of the letters patent. mr. roy contended that no such question had been decided by the order appealed from in the present case and, indeed there had been no decision of anything at all ..... contention that the order, allowing the amendment in that case, was a judgment and what he said had a clear reference to the terms of clause 15 of the letters patent. when he said of the order before him that it did not either affect the rights of the other party or otherwise prejudice him, lie obviously meant that it did .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 03 1981 (HC)

Mirta Lina Pr. Ltd. Vs. the Finlay Mills Ltd. and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1982Cal41

..... decree for possession (such a prayer not being made) and/or a decree for mesne profits as sought herein, as admittedly the subsequent suit valued at rs. 78,000/- is patently beyond the pecuniary jurisdiction of that court. 3. thirdly, the 'matter in issue' contemplated by section 10 means disputed material questions in the subsequent suit, which are directly and substantially ..... alia, the relief of possession and mesne profits and/or compensation i. e., a claim for money is made, whereas the earlier suit filed in the city civil court is patently a title suit limited in its scope, merely seeking a declaration that the notice of aug. 29. 1979 terminating the agreement dated dec. 26, 1975, is invalid, inoperative and void .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 1938 (PC)

Siddeswar Ghose and anr. Vs. Panchanan Bangal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1938Cal390

..... the correctness of the decision which he-has given, seeing that he desired that the matter should be further agitated in manner provided for by section 15 of the letters patent. the learned judge described the point which he had before him as being a short and interesting point of law which turns upon the interpretation of the proviso to article ..... costello, j.1. this matter comes before us as an appeal under the provisions of clause 15, letters patent of this court. the matter came before mukherjea j. on 22nd april 1937, and he then allowed an appeal against the decision of the subordinate judge, third court, 24 parganas .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 1956 (HC)

State of West Bengal Vs. Brindaban Chandra Pramanik and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1957Cal44,61CWN27

..... the indian independence (rights, property and liabilities) order, 1947. in accordance, therefore, with the opinion of the majority, as required by section 98, civil p. c. and cl 36, letters patent, the appeal will now be dismissed and it is dismissed accordingly.71. in view of the order for costs, already made by lahiri j., which stands, we do not propose ..... been dismissed. in view of the above difference, the matter was placed before lahiri j. as the third judge under section 98, civil p. c., read with clause 36, letters patent.70. lahiri j. has now given his opinion on the substantive point of difference, namely, whether article 9 or article 10 would apply to this case and he has, in .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //