Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: kolkata Year: 1950 Page 1 of about 22 results (0.010 seconds)

May 15 1950 (HC)

indra Singh and Sons Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-15-1950

Reported in : AIR1951Cal349,[1951]21CompCas172(Cal),54CWN721,[1951]19ITR1(Cal)

..... the applt. co. granted a licence, with option to purchase, so a foreign company who exercised the option. the special comrs. decided, on appeal, that the profits on sale of patents arose in the course of the applt. co.'s business. the house of lords held that there was evidence upon which the comrs. could come to the (conclusion.21. in ..... ) 13 tax cas. 366 which is a decision of the house of lords in england. in that case the assessee co. was formed for the purpose, inter alia, of acquiring patents, inventions & the like, & of using them, granting licences in respect of them, selling them or otherwise turning them to account. throughout the co.'s existence their only assets had been ..... patent rights but that foreign manufacturers usually required to be given an option to purchase as a condition of agreeing to take a licence to manufacture. in ..... one particular group of patents & the receipts brought into their profit & loss account had been made up of royalties for the use of these patents, interest, etc. it was shown that the co. had never originated an offer to sell foreign .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 1950 (HC)

Rati Kanta Haldar and ors. Vs. Burro and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-03-1950

Reported in : AIR1950Cal354

..... section 193 of the said act. the preliminary objection was sustained by the learned judge and the second appeals were dismissed on this ground. leave to appeal under the letters patent was given by the learned judge. pursuant to the leave so granted these appeals were filed by the defendants.6. the first question which calls for our determination is whether ..... g.n. das, j.1. these letters patent appeals arise out of suits for recovery of rent in respect of a jalkar in the river ichhamati which again is a part of a bigger jalkar called jalkar jainti .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 27 1950 (HC)

Sm. Akshoy Kumari Debi Vs. Nalini Ranjan Mukherjee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-27-1950

Reported in : AIR1950Cal493,54CWN815

..... 54 were not specified. the case was heard by engineer j. the learned judge granted an amendment of the application. against his decision an appeal was taken under the letters patent which was heard by a division bench presided over by beaumont c. j. in dismissing the appeal it was observed that the amendment was properly made. it was further observed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 1950 (HC)

Nalini Ranjan Bose Vs. MartIn and Co.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-18-1950

Reported in : AIR1951Cal39

..... trouble and expense of going into statements of accounts, which, unless the agency is established, would never be necessary at all. but in the case of a patent it is different : no doubt validity is one thing and infringement another, but both have to come or to be tried at the same time and the parties ..... interrogatories will be far more than made up for by the increased waste of time and money involved in having two trials of every patent action in which the plaintiff succeeds in establishing his patent instead of one. in my opinion that is not the meaning of the rules, and it would have a very bad effect ..... well as that of refusing it altogether. but if that means what it is contended it does mean, that in every patent action in which invalidity is set up--that is to say, in every patent action ever launched--there is first to be a deliberate trial before the judge and jury if necessary, of the validity ..... of the patent, and only after that has been settled are issues to be raised and discovery obtained by interrogatories and otherwise with regard to the question of ..... fabrik v. richardson and co., (1893) 62 l. j. ch. 710: (68 l. t. 404). that was a case of infringement of a patent where it was held that, although the defendant denied the validity of the plaintiffs patent, he might still be compelled to answer interrogatories as to his own process before the validity of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 1950 (HC)

Dominion of India Vs. Gopal Chandra Tapadar and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-14-1950

Reported in : AIR1951Cal37,55CWN113

..... action' as used in clause 12, letters patent, & at p. 544 of the report his lordship made the following observation:'the only definition that will work, if it has to be applied to oases of all kinds, is ..... jurisdiction of a ct. the expression 'cause of action' has been used in section 20, civil p. c., section 18, presidency small cause courts act as also clause 12, letters patent of the calcutta h. c. in the case of engineering supplies ltd. v. dhandhania and co. : air1931cal659 , rankin c. j. had to consider the meaning of the expression 'cause of ..... . secy. of state, i. l. r. (1941) 2 cal. 160, where his lordship took the view that carriage by railway is a business within the meaning of clause 12, letters patent, & is carried on by the govt. of india. in view of the three division bench judgments to which we have already referred it is impossible for us to follow the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 1950 (HC)

Sashi Bhusan Singha Vs. Sankar Mahato

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-05-1950

Reported in : AIR1950Cal252,54CWN936

..... the right of pre-emption is to be filed. but if reference is made to some of the provisions contained in section 26-c of the act, it will be patent that this latter section has to be read along with section 26-f.6. the opening words in sub-section (1) of s. 26c refer to 'every transfer' and the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 1950 (HC)

Sarat Chandra Sadhukhan and ors. Vs. Corporation of Calcutta and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-10-1950

Reported in : AIR1950Cal423,54CWN480

..... the earlier remark that 'the municipal magistrate being a presidency magistrate the high court has jurisdiction under section 439, criminal p. c., to revise his order.' was obiter. it is patently a misreading of the passage above quoted. 'some observation' referred to is not specifically quoted in the judgment of suhrawardy j. and the last words following the word 'namely' clearly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 1950 (HC)

Ashutosh Chakravarty Vs. Md. Yad Hossain

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-10-1950

Reported in : AIR1950Cal430

..... and those of the court of first instance are restored. the appellant in this court will have his costs throughout. 7. leave to appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent has been asked for and is refused.

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 1950 (HC)

Manik Lal Dutt and ors. Vs. PulIn Behari Pal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-28-1950

Reported in : AIR1950Cal431

..... dated 30th november 1945, is restored. 18. each party, in the circumstances of this case, will bear the costs of this court. 19. leave to appeal under clause 15, letters patent is granted.

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 1950 (HC)

Ramesh Chandra Roy Choudhury and anr. Vs. Bhupendra Bhusan Gangully

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-26-1950

Reported in : AIR1950Cal438

..... in the circumstances and the decree will be amended to provide such a condition.9. i make no order as to costs.10. leave to appeal under clause (15), letters patent is asked for and is refused.

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //