Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: kolkata Year: 2013 Page 1 of about 27 results (0.009 seconds)

Jun 21 2013 (HC)

Amiya Kr. Dutta Vs. the Principal Secretary.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-21-2013

..... s objects. (11) to conduct any experiments in connection with any business of the corporation and take out or otherwise acquire by original application or otherwise, any trade makes, letters patent or patent right or the like and to use exercise, develop grant licences in respect of sale, dispose of or otherwise turn to account any trade mark ..... , patents, patent or other rights, licences or other interests for the time being held or acquired by the corporation. (12) to remunerate any person or company for services rendered or to be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 2013 (HC)

Brishti Vinimay Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-01-2013

..... favour of the applicant who has questioned the jurisdiction and error, irregularity or illegality touching jurisdiction or procedure committed by an inferior court or tribunal of firs.instance is so patent and loudly obtrusive that it leaves on its decision indelible stamp of infirmity or vice which cannot be obliterated or cured on appeal or revision. in the instant case the ..... tribunal of firs.instance acts wholly without jurisdiction or patently in excess of jurisdiction or manifestly conducts the proceedings before it in a manner which is contrary to the rules of natural justice and all accepted rules of procedure and ..... cases and the instant case is in point-where the error, irregularity or illegality touching jurisdiction or procedure committed by an inferior court or tribunal of firs.instance is so patent & loudly obtrusive that it leaves on its decision and indelible stamp of infirmity or vice which cannot be obliterated or cured on appeal or revision. if an inferior court or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2013 (HC)

Fuel Sources India Private Limited Vs. Parekh Aluminex Limited and ors ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-29-2013

..... immediate and in view of 2007 (1) klj738the dishonour of cheque will not give rise to a cause of action. therefore the leave granted under clause 12 of the letters patent be revoked and the plaint be taken off the file of this court. in opposing the said application counsel for the plaintiff submits that section 20(c) of the 1908 ..... under order 7 rule 11 cpc for rejection of the plaint filed in c.s. 179 of 2013 and for revocation of leave granted under clause 12 of the letters patent. the case of the applicant/defendant no.1 is that the plaint does not disclose any cause of action and the cause of action, if any, arose outside the territorial .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 10 2013 (HC)

State of West Bengal Vs. Afcons Pauling (India) Limited

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-10-2013

..... been arrived at by tribunal was not palatable to the petitioner, it could not be ground enough for interfering with the award. there being no patent illegality, and the award not being opposed to public policy, the delhi high court refused to interfere with the award. the judgment rendered in ..... beyond the stipulated period of completion. the aforesaid finding that the claimants had repeatedly put the respondent on notice for claiming damages and compensation was patently perverse. the learned tribunal has not adverted to a single document or correspondence prior to 8th january, 2000 stating any claim to compensation for delay ..... on a process of reasoning, which is totally absurd and/or perverse, would also be in conflict with public policy. an award that is patently illegal has to be set aside as otherwise it would cause gross injustice. the judgment of the supreme court in municipal corporation of delhi versus ..... fundamental policy of indian law; or (b) the interest of india; or (c) justice or morality, or (d) in addition, if it is patently illegal. illegality must go to the root of the matter and if the illegality is of trivial nature it cannot be held that award is against the public ..... harmful to the public good or public interest has varied from time to time. however, the award which is, on the face of it, patently in violation of statutory provisions cannot be award/judgment/decision said is to be likely in public interest. to adversely affect such the administration of justice .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 26 2013 (HC)

itc Limited Vs. Godfrey Phillips India Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-26-2013

..... the question arises if the plaintiff could unite the action of passing off along with its claim or infringement under clause 14 of the letters patent. that of the two several issues, this high court has jurisdiction to try action for infringement is a relevant consideration to examine if the ..... and causing loss and prejudice to the plaintiff such order is required to be passed. mr.mookherjee has referred to clause 14 of the letters patent which states: 14. joinder of several causes of action. and we do further ordain, that where plaintiff has several causes of action against a ..... it was further argued that no prejudice could and/or would be caused to the defendant if leave granted under clause 14 of the letters patent, accordingly, inasmuch as trial of the instant suit has not yet commenced. it was further contended the tests to determine and prove infringement and ..... appearing on behalf of the plaintiff submits that due to oversight, the plaintiff had omitted to pray for leave under clause 14 of the letters patent at the time of presenting and/or filing the plaint although necessary pleadings in relation thereto are present and on the existing pleading the plaintiff ..... 11/2013 judgment on : 26th november, 2013 soumen sen, j.:- the plaintiff has filed this application for obtaining leave under clause 14 of the letters patent. the plaintiff has instituted the suit on 20th january, 2009. in the suit, the plaintiff has prayed decree of permanent injunction for restraining the defendants from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 04 2013 (HC)

Tega Industries Ltd. Vs. Kaveri Ultra Polymers (P) Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-04-2013

..... by the respondent for rectification and/or cancellation of such certificate entitles the petitioner to an order of injunction restraining the respondent from infringing patent no.231453 of the petitioner till 18th september, 2013. this suit has been filed after dismissal of c.s.120 of 2009 and the petitioner ..... of notice the respondent will take steps which will be prejudicial to the interest of the petitioner. having considered the facts of the case as the patent certificate has been issued in favour of the petitioner in respect of the said device and the same is valid and subsisting and no application filed ..... ranjan bachawat, mr.samrat sen, mr.manali bose for the petitioner. the court : in a suit for perpetual injunction restraining the respondent from infringing patent no.231453 this interim application has been filed for interim reliefs. the case of the petitioner is that an improved screen panel and fixing arrangement thereto has ..... and subsisting and it has come to the knowledge of the petitioner that the said screen panel in which it has a patent is being infringed by the respondent by manufacture and sale of devices similar to the device of the petitioner. as the petitioner has a registered ..... patent in its name an order of injunction is sought. no notice of this application has been given to the respondent as the petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 2013 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkatai, Kolkata Vs. M/S. G. V. N. Fuels ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-15-2013

..... non-taxable income. neither the cit (a) not the tribunal cared to find out whether the mandate of section 14a had been carried out. therefore, the order under challenge is patently bad and illegal. in the circumstances, the order under challenge is set aside. the matter is remanded to the assessing officer. he shall assess the amount of expenditure incurred for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 2013 (HC)

Kabari Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Shrimati Ila Basu and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-09-2013

..... the application of the original defendant no.9, shri shiv nath sharoff, (hereinafter referred to as od- 9 .) transferred to this hon'ble court under cl. 13 of the letters patent to be tried in its extra ordinary civil jurisdiction by an order dated 22.9.1982 passed in appeal by the division bench of sabyasachi mukherjee and suhas chandra sen .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 2013 (HC)

Dulal Kanti Chowdhury Vs. Standard Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-21-2013

..... a part of the cause of action has thus arisen outside the jurisdiction of this hon ble court. therefore, the plaintiff prays for leave under clause 12 of the letters patent. it has been specifically pleaded that the role of the defendant no.2 was to the extent of an advising bank and beyond that the defendant no.2 did not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 27 2013 (HC)

Sanjib Das Vs. State of W.B. and ors

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-27-2013

..... are entitled to practice alternative medicines. no law prohibits them from practicing alternative medicines. the respondent nos.14 and 15 contends that they have treated various patients as also obtained patent in respect of a particular medicine. they also contend that the members of the public are satisfied with the quality of medical relief given by them. the respondent no.16 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //