Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: madhya pradesh Year: 1958 Page 1 of about 19 results (0.045 seconds)

Aug 28 1958 (HC)

Munni Bai and anr. Vs. Abdul Gani

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-28-1958

Reported in : AIR1959MP225

g.p. bhutt, j.1. this is a letters patent appeal against the judgment in second appeal no. 227 of 1954 decided by deo j.2. the appellants were mortgagees in possession of a house situate at gobra-nawapara rajim, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 10 1958 (HC)

Habib Miyan Vs. Mahemud Mir

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-10-1958

Reported in : AIR1959MP221

m. hidayatullah, c.j.1. this appeal under the letters patent is against the judgment of kotval j, in second appeal no. 371 of 1950 dated 16th march 1956 and with the leave of the learned single judge.2. the appellant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 1958 (HC)

inayatullah Khan Vs. Diwanchand Mahajan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-26-1958

Reported in : AIR1959MP58

..... was manoeuvring for his success. that mahajan entertained this suspicion is trueenough and there are certain actions on which the conduct of sardar amarjit singh does not stand scrutiny, a patent fact in this connection is the number of telephonic conversations he had with inayatullah, one of the candidates. the trunk telephone bills have been produced to show that inayatullah and ..... were similarly employed for carrying voters. here again, we find it difficult to believe that tongas would have been hired in this manner and their use would have been so patent. needless to say that there is no corroboration of the evidence of mano-harlal, nor was any protest registered at the time with the presiding officer whose report does not ..... supreme court, and we think that the matter must rest there. we cannot, however, help saying that this breach on the part of the returning officer was of a very patent nature and one which could easily have been avoided by him by being more circumspect in examining the ruling of the supreme court, which was indisputably before him and which ..... candidates on top and underneath are entered votes which they have received as a result of the count of all the five stations. the corrections in this form are quite patent. they have been made in the column of inayatullah, where quite apparently, the figure 103 which was entered first has been scored out and the figure 284 is written-as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 1958 (HC)

Maursinha Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-26-1958

Reported in : AIR1958MP397

..... , 1922, their lordships were obviously considering the same from the point as to whether there was or there was not an error apparent on the face of the record. such patent error did appear to their lordships on the face of the record having regard to the charges and their explanation rendered by the kareli municipality.the error amounted to one ..... do is to demolish the order which, according to its view, is without jurisdiction or palpably erroneous. it cannot substitute its own view for those of the inferior tribunal. the patent error must be an error of law revealed on the face of the order; vide t. c. basappa v. t. nagaupa, air 1954 sc 440 (l).39. with these principles .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 1958 (HC)

K.L. Chaturvedi Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-26-1958

Reported in : 1960CriLJ1614

..... into force, the director of health services by his memorandum, dated 21st february 1957, informed the petitioner in answer to his letter dated 13th january, 1957 that in case of patent and proprietary medicines true formulae will have to be disclosed (annexure 4). further correspondence followed, when the aforesaid direction was reiterated: (annexures 5 and 7). in issuing the certificate ..... the petitioner states he had no grievance. he had disclosed the true formula to the central drugs laboratory and obtained the registration number cdl/1059 with respect to his patent and proprietary medicine 'germs killer'. he had also obtained a licence as required by the act for file manufacture and sale of his proprietary medicine and was manufacturing and ..... and detailed receipt of the ingredients, it indicates correctly all the potent or poisonous substances contained therein together with an approximate statement of the composition of the medicine.the expression 'patent or proprietary medicine' was defined in section 3 (d) to mean:a drug which is a remedy or prescription prepared for internal or external use of human beings or ..... act, 1940, as amended by the drugs (amendment) act, 1955, was unconstitutional and void, as it unreasonably restricted the fundamental right of the petitioner to manufacture and sell his patent' and proprietary medicine, 'germs killer' without disclosing on the carton or label of the drugs its true formula or list of ingredients.2. the relevant facts may shortly be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 08 1958 (HC)

Qamarali Wahid Ali Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-08-1958

Reported in : AIR1959MP46

..... , the prerogative powers werenot exercised on account of the long delay. more-over this court in exercise of prerogative powers couldnot interfere with a pre-constitution matter. leave forfiling letters patent appeal under clause 10 is refused.

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 1958 (HC)

Syed Qamarali Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-18-1958

Reported in : (1959)ILLJ47MP

..... powers were not exercised on account of the long delay. moreover this court, in exercise of prerogative powers, could not interfere with a pre-constitution matter. leave for filing letters patent appeal under clause 10 is refused.

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 1958 (HC)

The Bilaspur Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. the State of Madhya Pr ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-17-1958

Reported in : AIR1959MP77

..... that the subordinate police officers were dishonest and privy to the theft of the box. the investigation by the police did not result in any such discovery. negligence, however, was patent.17. we accordingly hold that in the case of a master and servant, where the master is the bailee, and the servant is either dishonest or negligent, the master must .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 1958 (HC)

Kanhayyalal Shivasahay Sharma Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax and ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-28-1958

Reported in : AIR1958MP211; [1958]9STC503(MP)

..... acts could be relied upon by the appellate authorities of the department. the contention of the petitioner is that on the date on which the assessment was made it was patently beyond time because the act came into force on 23-5-1947, and even three calendar years calculated from that date would expire in 1950 and not in 1952. he .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 14 1958 (HC)

Ramlal Singh and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-14-1958

Reported in : AIR1958MP380; 1958CriLJ1402

..... fact that the discretion must be exercised by reference to all the circumstances of each particular case, and, allowance must be made when the motive for uttering a falsehood is patent on the face of it. in the present case, keshar singh p. w. 2, was belaboured by the accused; he became unconscious as a result o the injuries and continued ..... under section 302 read with section 149 of the indian penal code on a misreading of the evidence on record. this reference is governed by clause 26 of the letters patent, under which i am entitled to decide only the point of difference between the learned judges and not any point on which they have agreed. therefore, only the question of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //