Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: madhya pradesh Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 6 results (0.043 seconds)

Apr 09 1986 (HC)

Deva Vs. Durgashankar and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-09-1986

Reported in : AIR1986MP195

..... the supreme court expressly stated that it was refraining from expressing any opinion in that behalf. with great respect to the learned judges, who decided letters patent appeal no. 16 of 1985 (reported in 1986 lab ic 640) (madh pra), we are of the opinion that from the observations of the supreme ..... of maintainability of an appeal from an interlocutory order passed in a civil suit on the original side of the bombay high court, which is constituted by letters patent. with a view to clarify this position, the supreme court observed in para 125 of its judgment in air 1981 sc 1786 (supra) as follows : ..... this rule has been given statutory recognition in section 32, interpretation act the purpose of the reference to section 108 in cl 15 of the letters patent was to incorporate that power in the charter of the court itself, and not to make it moribund at that stage and make it rigid and ..... v. radheshyam suroliya.) the division bench which heard this appeal, noted that on the question of maintainability of an appeal under cl 10 of the letters patent, from an order disposing of a petition under article 226 of the constitution, there was a conflict in two division bench decisions of this court in ..... court. aggrieved by the final decision given by a learned single judge in such petition, an appeal was preferred under clause 10 of the letters patent constituting this high court when that appeal came up for hearing before a division bench of this court, a preliminary objection was raised as to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 25 1986 (HC)

Gangaram Bendil Vs. Rashmi Parihar and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-25-1986

Reported in : 1987MPLJ410

..... counsel for the election petitioner that the impugned order in the present appeal did not amount to 'judgment' within the meaning of clause 10 of the letters patent and therefore the appeal was incompetent. several authorities were cited in support of the contention, but we do not propose to decide the preliminary objection about maintainability of the appeal ..... in laxmi narain v. ramratan. 1986 jab lj 238 : (air 1986 madh pra 165), it was not disputed that a letters patent appeal against an interlocutory order, amounting to 'judgment' within the meaning of clause 10 of the letters patent, passed in an election petition by a single judge is competent. it was, however, submitted by shri p.l. dubey the learned ..... the arguments of shri p.l. dubey, counsel for the respondent no. 1. he did not argue any new point, requiring any separate dicsussion.13. in the result, this letters patent appeal is hereby dismissed. in the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs of the appeal. ..... k.m. agarwal, j. 1. this letters patent appeal by the returned candidate is directed against an order passed on 18-8-1986 by the learned single judge of this court in a pending election petition no. 23 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 20 1986 (HC)

General Manager, Western Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Kalasia Bai

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-20-1986

Reported in : (1994)IIILLJ1055MP

..... any work, the proper compensation to be awarded would have been rs. 33,600/- and not rs. 25,000/-. it is, therefore, clear that the learned commissioner has committed a patent error in calculating the amount of compensation. the error, however, is to the benefit of the appellants and therefore, they can get no advantage of it.8. the learned counsel ..... on his failure to get the order set aside, he should not be able to challenge the award on merits. denying such an employer the remedy of appeal would be patently unjust and would, therefore be contrary to the purposes of the act. in a civil case like this, section 14 of the limitation act would come to the rescue of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 1986 (HC)

Harishchandra and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-29-1986

Reported in : 1987CriLJ1724

..... of kerosene oil is found to be there on various items, seized from the place and also, the deceased's clothes. considering all this material, mst. mina's death is patently found to be a case of 'suicide', and not of any accident, for which, there is absolutely no iota of evidence whatsoever. therefore, there is no scope for doubt that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 1986 (HC)

Narendra Glass Works (P.) Ltd. Vs. M.P. Beer Products Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-07-1986

Reported in : [1989]65CompCas396(MP)

..... other business as may be proper or necessary in connection with the above object; (d) to raise and prepare monograms and patent designs for the products manufactured by the company or in which the company carries on trade and get the patent rights registered. 6. according to the petitioners, the respondent company, in their correspondence with them, admitted their liability to a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 1986 (HC)

Electro Medicals Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-18-1986

Reported in : [1987]163ITR807(MP)

..... agreement is a capital asset. technical know-how made available by a party to such an agreement does not stand on the same footing as protected rights under a registered patent. there is no property right in a know-how which can be transferred just as it is, in a limited sense, in a ..... patent. in any case, a party making the know-how available can hardly make any attempt to retrieve all the information supplied after the other party to the agreement has fully .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //