Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: madhya pradesh Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 55 results (0.045 seconds)

Feb 12 2004 (HC)

Jabalpur Development Authority Vs. Y.S. Sachan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-12-2004

Reported in : 2004(2)MPHT314; 2004(2)MPLJ178

..... not state the law correctly.13. though we have expressed the view that cross-objection or cross-appeal at the instance of the respondents in letters patent appeal is not maintainable, however, keeping in view the pronouncement of the supreme court, it can be said that it is always open to the ..... order or decree, shall be excluded.(3) a memorandum of appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent shall be accompanied by two certified copies or one certified copy and one photocopy or two photo-copies of the judgment and order or decree appealed ..... the appeal may be condoned for good and sufficient reason.(2) in computing the period of limitation for an appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent, the time taken for obtaining leave to appeal, when such leave is necessary and the time taken for obtaining certified copy of the judgment and ..... of substantive law, the writ petitions are filed under article 226 of the constitution and the writ appeals are filed under clause 15 of the letters patent. it is to govern these proceedings that the writ proceedings rules have been framed. this was necessity for the reason that in the appellate side ..... . the question that falls for consideration before the full bench is framed thus :--'whether in a writ appeal preferred under clause 10 of the letters patent, an intra court appeal, being an appeal on the appellate side of the court arising from a case decided in exercise of jurisdiction under articles .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 02 2004 (HC)

Shiv Kumar Saxena and ors. Vs. Manishchand Sinha and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-02-2004

Reported in : 2004(4)MPHT475

..... learned single judge who heard the matter, dismissed the said writ petition by order dated 12-9-2003. the order of the learned single judge is challenged in this letters patent appeal.4. the learned counsel for the appellants contended that the document is a draft agreement and not an 'agreement', and, therefore, it is not exigible to stamp duty. alternatively .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 04 2004 (HC)

Smt. Naravadi Bai Choudhary and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-04-2004

Reported in : 2005(2)MPHT119; 2005(2)MPLJ306

..... , j.1. being aggrieved by the order dated 11-2-2003 passed by learned single judge in writ petition no. 5940/2002, appellants have filed this letters patent appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent.2. a thumb nail sketch of the case is thus:--2.1. respondent no. 7 suresh pathak was elected as president of nagar panchayat, bareli, district .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 2004 (HC)

Gyan Singh Markam Vs. Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-labou ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-26-2004

Reported in : 2004(3)MPHT82; 2004(3)MPLJ435

..... case it can not be said that in dismissing the writ petition, the original jurisdiction under article 226 of the constitution of india was exercised. therefore, this letters patent appeal is legally not maintainable.8. on merits also the petitioner has no case. the industrial tribunal found that the petitioner has obtained the employment on false representation. ..... ancillary directions which may pertain article 227, this ought not to be held to deprive a party of the right of appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent where the substantial part of the order sought to be appealed against is under article 226.5. the same view has been taken in sushilabai v. nihalchand, ..... behalf of the petitioner that the writ petition filed by him was 'both under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india' and therefore, the letters patent appeal is not barred. on merits it has been argued on behalf of the petitioner that his services have been terminated after five years on the ground that ..... been raised on behalf of the respondents that the writ petition filed by the petitioner was under article 227 of the constitution of india and therefore, the letters patent appeal is not maintainable. reliance has been placed on division bench decision of this court in abdul rahim khan v. m.p.s.r.t.c., 1999( ..... order1. this is an appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent against order dated 24-6-2002 in writ petition no. 1708 of 2002.2. the writ petition was filed by the petitioner challenging the award .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 2004 (HC)

Dr. S.M.P. Sharma and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-30-2004

Reported in : 2005(1)MPHT380; 2005(1)MPLJ398

..... the appellants in w.p. nos. 4069/2004 and 4049/2004. the learned single judge, dismissed the petitions by orders dated 12-7-2004, which are challenged in these letters patent appeals.4. the appellants have urged the following contentions in these appeals:-(i) the consent of the borrowing department and the deputationists is necessary before recalling the services of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 2004 (HC)

Shivshankar Warde and ors. Vs. Dewas-shajapur Kshetriya GramIn Bank an ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-26-2004

Reported in : (2005)ILLJ437MP; 2004(3)MPLJ381

1. this intra-court appeal under clause x of letters patent has been preferred by some of unsuccessful petitioners of writ petition no. 799/2000, decided by learned single judge on june 25, 2001. writ petition was filed by as many .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 28 2004 (HC)

S. Vayyapuri Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Tax and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-28-2004

Reported in : [2005]141STC229(MP)

..... petitions in limine. thus, there was no reply filed by respondents to the averments made by appellants in their petitions.10. now letters patent appeals have been preferred against dismissal of their petitions under clause x of the letters patent.11. show cause notices against admission were issued to the respondents. respondents have submitted their reply/return before this court. respondents have ..... in the market then, which, was also scrutinised by learned single judge, who was, then, pleased to dismiss the petitions, against such findings, no case for interference in this letters patent appeal is made out.24. thus, this and the connected appeals are, accordingly, hereby dismissed, but with no order as to costs.

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 08 2004 (HC)

Milan Supari Stores Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Tax and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-08-2004

Reported in : 2005(1)MPLJ98; [2006]146STC360(MP)

orderuma nath singh, j.1. this letters patent appeal has been preferred by the assessee-appellant against an order dated september 16, 2003 passed by learned single judge dismissing the writ petition (w.p. no. 674 of 2002) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2004 (HC)

R.P. Chitrakar Vs. M.P. Electricity Board

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-15-2004

Reported in : 2004(4)MPHT255

orderk.k. lahoti, j.1. this appeal is filed under clause 10 of letters patent assailing order of learned single judge dated 23-3-1997 in m.p. no. 1234 of 1984 dismissing the writ petition.2. the factual matrix of the case necessary for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 2004 (HC)

Vyapar Mandal Mandi Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-19-2004

Reported in : AIR2005MP9; 2004(2)MPHT552; 2004(2)MPLJ482

..... 10-7-2003 between municipal council, morena and respondent no. 4 neeraj sharma be quashed being contrary to law. petition has been dismissed by the single bench. thereafter, this letters patent appeal is filed.2. counsel for the appellant submitted that rules known as terminal tax (assessment and collection) on the goods exported from m.p. municipal limits rules, 1996 (hereinafter .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //