Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: mumbai nagpur Year: 2013 Page 1 of about 27 results (0.006 seconds)

Aug 20 2013 (HC)

Chandrashekhar S/O Manohar Tanksale Vs. Pandharinath S/O Vithobaji New ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Aug-20-2013

..... considered view that the learned single judge has erred in interfering with the order of the executing court. in that view of the matter, the appeal succeeds. (a) the letter patents appeal is allowed. (b) the impugned order passed by the learned single judge is quashed and set aside. (c) the petition filed by the respondent/tenant is dismissed. (d) the ..... cannot be said that the objection is such which is apparent on the face of the record. 23. insofar as the orders passed by the division bench in two letter patent appeals are concerned, the said orders are merely some orders inter se between the parties issuing directions and do not lay down any proposition of law and as such the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 04 2013 (HC)

Nandu S/O Sambaji Nagarkar Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Its Secre ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Sep-04-2013

..... m.r. in 1898 found the rule ??as necessary now, as it was when lord coke reported 'heydon's case (v) ? . in ?? 'eastman photographic material co. vs. comptroller general of patents, designs and trade marks' 1898 act 571 at p.576 (x) earl of halsbury reaffirmed the rule as follows : ??my lords, it appears to me that to construe the statute .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 2013 (HC)

Agricultural Produce Market Committee Vs. the Hon'ble Member, Industri ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jan-30-2013

..... ) and its object. he, therefore, prays for allowing the letters patent appeal. 15. provision of section 2(e) of industrial employment (standing orders) act, 1946 defines ??industrial establishment ? to mean an ??industrial establishment ? as defined in clause (ii) of section ..... whether statutory act of regulation by itself tantamounts to adaption is a disputed question of fact and hence it cannot be gone into for the first time in this letters patent appeal. he has again reiterated the part of his arguments already reproduced above to urge that disjunctive interpretation of clause (f) militates with 1982 amendment to section 2(ii ..... ? , object of constitution of apmc has been examined and then a finding that the appellant-apmc is other establishment has been reached. he, therefore, prays for dismissal of letters patent appeal. 14. the learned counsel for the appellant, in his brief reply argument, has submitted that the reliance upon the judgment of allahabad high court by the learned agp is ..... in establishment i.e. market yard of apmc was sufficient to include it in that clause. it is precisely this observation and finding which has been questioned in present letters patent appeal. 4. shri uday dastane, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, at the outset, pointed out that in absence of model standing orders, the service regulations of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 2013 (HC)

Satish S/O Raghuvirchand Sood and Others Vs. Gujrat Tale Links Pvt. Lt ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jul-26-2013

..... questions, which are raised by the appellants, can be gone into by the learned arbitrator under section 16 of the said act. the learned counsel, therefore, submits that the letters patent appeal deserves to be dismissed. 7. shri jagtap, who appear for respondents 2 and 3, also submits that the suit itself was not maintainable and therefore, no interference could be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 2013 (HC)

Dashrath Rajaram Solanke and Others Vs. the Executive Engineer, Chief ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Mar-22-2013

..... the learned single judge is modified to that extent only. rest of the judgment of learned single judge is maintained as it is. 31. letters patent appeal is thus partly allowed by directing the respondents to pay notice pay in accordance with the provisions of section 25f of the industrial disputes act, ..... months from the date of termination of service. all the five appellants dissatisfied with the judgment and order passed by the learned single judge filed letters patent appeals which were numbered as 140-144 of 2007. the division bench noticed the undisputed facts that all the appellants were temporarily employed on daily wages ..... post. the appeals before it were against the common judgment and order passed by the division bench of the bombay high court at aurangabad in letters patent appeals arising out of writ petitions whereby the order passed by the learned single judge quashing the award passed by the labour court, jalagaon, has been ..... granting him any relief except the relief of retrenchment compensation in terms of section 25f. the learned additional government pleader, therefore, pressed for dismissal of letters patent appeal. 10. the judgment of learned single judge needs to be perused in the background of two questions to which our attention has been invited. ..... b.p. dharmadhikari, j. 1. by this appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent, the appellants-employees have questioned the judgment dated 15.10.1997 delivered by the learned single judge in writ petition no. 2618 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 2013 (HC)

Madhukar S/O Deorao Dudhe Vs. Ranapratap Shriram Malviya and Others

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Feb-28-2013

..... the act, cannot furnish a cause of action to a landlord after coming into force of 1999 act. 12. in the result, no case is made out warranting interference. letters patent appeal is accordingly rejected. rule is discharged. no costs. 13. upon request of appellant, interim relief protecting possession of the appellant in force till today is continued for further period ..... no. 2030 of 2011 was then filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india by present appellant and the learned single judge dismissed that writ petition. letters patent appeal is challenging the said dismissal of writ petition. on 20.03.2012, while issuing notice, this court noted the contention that sub-tenancy to attract provisions of section 16 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 12 2013 (HC)

indorama Synthetics India Limited Vs. Vijay and Others

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jul-12-2013

..... .1481 of 2006 by upholding the order passed by the learned industrial court to the extent it dismisses part of the complaint. 18. in view of disposal of the letters patent appeals, the civil applications are disposed of.

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 04 2013 (HC)

Sudhakar S/O Trimbakrao Kalmegh Vs. Seth Bansidhar Dahigaonkar and Oth ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Oct-04-2013

..... the ground that the appointment of the appellant is not granted approval by the education officer is unjustified and cannot be sustained. hence, we pass the following order. 10. letters patent appeal is allowed. impugned judgment and order dated 25th of june, 2001 in w.p.no.4020 of 2000 passed by learned single judge of this court as well as ..... of shakuntalashirbhate and kankavalishikshan sanstha. the respondent nos.1 and 2 have accepted these findings and have not challenged it. even at the time of the hearing of this letters patent appeal, the respondent nos.1 and 2 were not in a position to point out that the findings of the tribunal that the appointment of the appellant was made as ..... the learned single judge of this court by the judgment dated 25th of june, 2001. the appellant has challenged the judgment passed by the learned single judge in this letters patent appeal. 5. we have heard shri anil mardikar, learned advocate for the appellant and mr.sambhare, learned advocate for the respondents and have examined the record. 6. shri mardikar, learned ..... oral judgment: (z.a. haq, j.) 1. this letters patent appeal arises out of the judgment passed by the learned single judge dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant ?? employee and upholding the order passed by the school tribunal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 2013 (HC)

Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik Vs. Kalicharan and O ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Apr-09-2013

..... selection committee, it would have to be held that the requirement as to quorum was not fulfilled in the meeting dated 7/7/2007. 18. consequently, we allow the letters patent appeal and set aside the judgment dated 16/8/2011 of the learned single judge and dismiss the writ petition of respondent no.1. no order as to costs. at ..... learned counsel for the original petitioner prays that this judgment may be kept in abeyance for six weeks since the original petitioner had been promoted provisionally subject to this letters patent appeal and he is holding the said post since one and half years. let this judgment be kept in abeyance for a period of four weeks.

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 04 2013 (HC)

Anil S/O Wamanrao Gawande Vs. Mahalaxmi Railway Karmachari Sahakari an ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Oct-04-2013

..... the notice of expulsion dated 05.10.1991, which is illegal in view of the conclusions drawn by us above. 16. we, therefore, pass the following order: order (i) letters patent appeal no. 113/2002 is partly allowed. (ii) judgment and order in writ petition no. 3116/2001 dated 18.06.2002 is set aside. (iii) proceedings of writ petition no .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //