Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: mumbai Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 154 results (0.009 seconds)

Nov 30 2005 (HC)

Joint Cit, Vs. Essar Oil Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-30-2005

Reported in : [2006]7SOT216(NULL)

..... permanent establishment to the head office of the enterprise or any of its other offices, by way of royalties, fees or other similar payments in return for the use of patents or other rights, or by way of commission, for specific services performed or for management, or, except in the case of a banking enterprise, by way of interest on monies ..... permanent establishment to the head office of the enterprise or any of its other offices, by way of royalties, fees or other similar payments in return for the use of patents or other rights, or by way of commission for specific services performed or for management, or, except in the case of a banking enterprise, by way of interest on monies .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 2005 (TRI)

Metchem Canada Inc. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-30-2005

Reported in : (2006)100ITD251(Mum.)

..... the pe to the head office of the enterprise or any of its other offices, by way of royalties, fees or other similar payments in return for the use of patents, know-how or other rights, or by way of commission or other charges, for specific services performed or for management, or, except in the case of a banking enterprise, by ..... the pe to the head office of the enterprise or any of its other offices, by way of royalties, fees or other similar payments in return for the use of patents, know-how or other rights, or by way of commission or other charges for specific services performed or for management, or, except in the case of a banking enterprise, by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 2005 (HC)

Hawkins Cookers Ltd. Vs. Zaverchand Liladhar Shah and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-29-2005

Reported in : 2005(31)PTC129(Bom)

..... motion no. 3031 of 1994 and the said motion has been dismissed.5. in the aforesaid premises, the petitioners have filed the present petition under section 51a of the indian patent and designs act, 1911 inter alia seeking cancellation of the registered design of the respondent no. 1. the ground on which the said cancellation is sought is that the petitioners ..... two designs side by side, but also apart, and a little distance away,' mr. blanco while has also reiterated similar propositions of law in his work 'patents for propositions of law in his work 'patents for inventions' (3rd edition) at page 265 where the learned author has said:'the existence or not of substantial novelty or originality is a question of fact .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 2005 (TRI)

Assistant Commissioner of Vs. Hinditron Services (P.) Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-25-2005

Reported in : (2006)99ITD479(Mum.)

..... or incorporeal. though it does not always mean physical property but it does mean the right, title, interest in a property. property also includes rights such as trade marks, copyrights, patents and even intellectual rights capable of transfer or transmission. they also include beneficial rights to a thing considered as having money value especially with reference to transfer/succession and their .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 2005 (TRI)

Arco Whitey Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : May-17-2005

Reported in : (2006)(193)ELT217Tri(Mum.)bai

..... purchased the manufacturing unit as a 'going concern' with all its assets, including the goodwill, right to use the trade mark and all technical drawing and designs and know-how, patents, licenses etc. in consideration of rs. 107.00 lakhs. as such, it is their contention that with effect from 28.03.94, the trade mark belongs to them and has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 17 2005 (TRI)

The D.C.i.T. (Osd), Range 7(2) Vs. Saraf Chemicals Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-17-2005

Reported in : (2006)102ITD356(Mum.)

..... supreme court decision in the case of ciba (india) ltd. 69 itr 692. it was held in this case that any expenditure incurred for obtaining the right to use the patents and trademarks for a limited period is to be considered as an expenditure of revenue nature. the ld.cit(a) has then referred to the supreme court decision in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 2005 (HC)

Smt. Chanchalben Amritlal Patel Vs. Deputy Collector (Enc) and Compete ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-08-2005

Reported in : 2005(3)ALLMR494; 2005(3)BomCR461; 2005(3)MhLj834

..... . 261. 9. keeping in view the submissions advanced by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, in our opinion, the following questions arise for determination in this group of letters patent appeals: (i) the competent authority while dealing with the application filed under section 22 of the act, seeking permission to institute a suit for obtaining any decree or order for ..... ') by his judgment and order dated 29.11.2000. that order was carried in writ petition no. 2828 of 2002 which also was dismissed on 20.12.2001. the letters patent appeal filed against that order bearing no. 12 of 2002 has been admitted by this court. however, notice of motion taken out therein for interim relief came to be dismissed ..... have filed the application under section 22 of the act seeking permission to institute a suit for eviction on the ground of arrears of rent. in the circumstances, these letters patent appeals fail and are dismissed as such. no costs. ..... d.b. bhosale, j.1. all the nine letters patent appeals involve common questions and, therefore, we propose to decide them by a common judgment. though the appellants in all the appeals are different the facts are similar. the appeals .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 2005 (HC)

Uttam S/O Ambadasrao Gawali Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-08-2005

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR442; 2006(3)BomCR915; 2005(3)MhLj550

..... court. even the power flowing from the paramount charter under which the high court functions would not get excluded unless statutory enactment concerned expressly excludes the appeal under letters patent.'here again we clarify that we have extensively dealt with the said judgment in the earlier part of our judgment while dealing with the submissions made on behalf of the ..... directed against a judgment of the learned single judge in petition filed under article 227 of the constitution of india. while dealing with the preliminary issue of maintainability of letters patent appeal, division bench did notice that the writ petition had invoked jurisdiction under article 227 and not under article 226 of the constitution of india. referring to the judgment ..... : [1955]1scr1104 , to which we will refer to at appropriate stage.7. per contra, shri v.d. salunke, learned advocate appearing for the contesting respondent contended that the letters patent is not maintainable as the learned single judge in express terms observed that the petition is a petition filed and considered one under article 227 of the constitution. shri salunke ..... court to the effect that in case the high court (learned single judge) disposed of the petition by exercising power under article 227 of the constitution of india, the letters patent appeal under clause 15 is not maintainable. (see i) umaji keshao meshram and ors. v. radhikabai widow of anandrao banapurkar and anr. reported in : 1986crilj1084 ; ii) state of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 2005 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) Through the Commissioner of Customs Vs. Hoganas I ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-21-2005

Reported in : (2005)107BOMLR61; 2006(199)ELT8(Bom)

..... application had, therefore been rejected not only under sub-section (1-a) but also under sub-section (1). the submission has only to be stated to be rejected. it is patent from para 7.1, which we have quoted, that the only reason for not proceeding with the applications was the objection raised by the commissioner under sub-section (1-a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 2005 (HC)

Dhondi Rama Bhalekar (Deceased by His Heirs Ramchandra and ors.) Vs. P ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-16-2005

Reported in : 2006(1)BomCR509; (2006)108BOMLR60; 2006(2)MhLj94

..... were given by disregarding the procedure laid down by the said act and in gross violation of those provisions. (c) the judgments in tenancy cases by the tenancy authorities were patently illegal, without jurisdiction and wrong in law and resulted into failure of justice to the appellants, the civil court erred in holding that it had no jurisdiction to consider the ..... by the plaintiff in support of the claim so made. thus the decrees passed by the courts below are, in the absence of any evidence, leave alone any reliable evidence, patently erroneous and have resulted into miscarriage of justice. 8. in the premises, this second appeal succeeds and the same is hereby allowed. the orders passed by both the courts below .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //