Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: mumbai Year: 2005 Page 10 of about 154 results (0.008 seconds)

Sep 09 2005 (HC)

Unique Pharmaceutical Laboratories Vs. Stalco Freight International Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-09-2005

Reported in : 2006(1)ALLMR134; II(2006)BC459; 2005(6)BomCR829

..... even if the defendant carries on business then that court can have a concurrent jurisdiction to entertain and try the present suit whether as per clause 12 of the letters patent or section 20 of the civil procedure code. in both the cases, the court at uae will have at least a concurrent jurisdiction because the defendant carries on business at uae. thus .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 2005 (HC)

Anirudha S. Bhagat Vs. Ramnivas Meena and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-20-2005

Reported in : 2005(4)MhLj41

..... is a chairman and managing director of a company known as m/s. quadricon pvt. ltd. and the said company is engaged in the business of construction of bridge through patented construction system in quadricon. the said bridge was also constructed by the said company.4. a summons under section 160 of the code of criminal procedure dated 7-10-2003 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 2005 (HC)

The Brihan Maharashtra Sugar Syndicate, a Company Incorporated Under t ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-21-2005

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR739; 2006(2)BomCR103; 2006(1)MhLj344; 2006(33)PTC188(Bom)

..... case of the plaintiffs. there is no resemblance whatsoever between the two labels excepting the background colour orange. in view of this matter, the judgment of the trial court is patently wrong. the findings of the trial court on vital issues nos. 6, 7 and 8 are perverse, these findings are set aside. issue nos. 11, 12 and 13 are required .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 2005 (HC)

Pundlik Chingalaba Kaje Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-13-2005

Reported in : 2006(2)ALLMR684; 2006(1)BomCR368

..... would be in accordance with rule 5 as interpreted by this court in a judgement dated 2.5.2001 in (shri suresh ramchandra palande v. shri balasaheb manik farate) letters patent appeal no. 175 of 1997. therefore, according to the learned counsel, mandamus must issue directing the collector to consider the change of name.6. mr. jahagirdar, the learned counsel for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 03 2005 (HC)

Maharashtra General Kamgar Union Vs. Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-03-2005

Reported in : 2006(2)MhLj115

..... the complainants could not be prima facie believed. a writ petition filed by the company was dismissed by a single judge of the court observing that the appellant had made patently unsustainable attempt to defeat the jurisdiction of the industrial court by a bold denial of existence of employer and employee relationship. reversing the judgment of the single judge, the division .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2005 (HC)

Girish J. Bobade Vs. Ajay Thakur and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-22-2005

Reported in : 2006(2)ALLMR381; 2006(2)MhLj702

..... section 20 of the family courts act, the act has an overriding effect, notwithstanding anything inconsistent contained in any other law. the full bench considered the provisions of the letters patent and concluded that when the high court exercises its ordinary original civil jurisdiction in relation to the matters under the family courts act, it would be considered as a district .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 2005 (TRI)

Stanlubes and Specialities Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-03-2005

..... . no such allegation was made in the scn nor any material placed on record. d) the impugned order proceeds on the basis that greases were produced on the basis of patented formula which is an intellectual property and tangible asset. no such allegation was made in scn. e) the impugned order holds that in the price declaration, disclosure of various expenses .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 2005 (TRI)

Raju Fabrics and Shri Sanjay B. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-08-2005

..... as per the central excise tariff act, 1985 by allowing them exemption under notification no. 8/97-ce and so the demand of customs duty as per customs tariff is patently misconceived, unlawful and unsustainable. he further submitted that even if it is assumed without admitting that the subject clearances are not goods allowed to be sold in india as per .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 2005 (TRI)

Ayurchem Products Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-19-2005

Reported in : (2005)(190)ELT275Tri(Mum.)bai

..... . g.d. pharmaceuticals ltd. cites supra, the product, i.e. bordine containing boric acid with zinc oxide, was being classified under item 14e of the erstwhile central excise tariff as patent and proprietary medicine. the high court of calcutta held that the introduction of new tariff under ceta did not make any difference to the issue of classification of medicaments and .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 2005 (TRI)

Arco Whitey Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : May-17-2005

Reported in : (2006)(193)ELT217Tri(Mum.)bai

..... purchased the manufacturing unit as a 'going concern' with all its assets, including the goodwill, right to use the trade mark and all technical drawing and designs and know-how, patents, licenses etc. in consideration of rs. 107.00 lakhs. as such, it is their contention that with effect from 28.03.94, the trade mark belongs to them and has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //