Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: mumbai Year: 2005 Page 5 of about 154 results (0.008 seconds)

Oct 07 2005 (HC)

Harish Kawa Vs. P.T. Mehta

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-07-2005

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR657; 2006(1)BomCR70; (2005)107BOMLR854

..... . 1994 s.c. 1837; brahmadev choudhary v. rishikesh prasad, a.i.r. 1997 s.c. 856disposition: appeal dismissedjudgements.c. dharmadhikari, j.1. this appeal under clause 15 of the letters patent read with order xxi rule 103 of the code of civil procedure, 1908 is directed against the judgement and order of a learned single judge delivered on 18th january 1996 ..... the learned judge does not suffer from any illegality or perversity and is, therefore, not required to be set aside by us in the appellate jurisdiction conferred by the letters patent and the code of civil procedure, 1908. 64. for the reasons indicated above, we are of the view that the appellant was entitled to be evicted and the direction to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 2005 (HC)

Ms. Khushi Harkishan Malhotra Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-08-2005

Reported in : 2006CriLJ612

..... is in a position to substantiate the said allegation.9. the learned p.p. submitted that the allegations which are made in the writ petition no. 1710 of 2005 are patently false. he relied upon the affidavit of one dilip vana hivrale who is at present district welfare and child welfare officer. he was working as the superintendent of navjeevan mahila .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 2005 (HC)

Shanta Bai Shivaji Kale Vs. Jaspal Singh Keval Singh Manhas and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-02-2005

Reported in : II(2006)ACC102

..... the rate of 10% per annum from the date of the application till the realisation of the amount together with the costs to the extent of the claim. the letters patent appeal is allowed. the impugned award, accordingly, stands modified. ..... d.b. bhosale, j.1. this letters patent appeal is directed against the order dated 26th october, 1999 passed by the learned single judge in first appeal no. 886 of 1999 by which the appeal was dismissed in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2005 (HC)

Satish Dalichand Shah Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-16-2005

Reported in : AIR2005Bom442; 2006(1)BomCR922

..... appellate court that the suit filed by the appellant was barred by law of limitation and we do hereby confirm the same. for the reasons stated above, therefore, the letters patent appeal fails and is hereby dismissed. there shall be no order as to costs.20. at this state, the learned advocate for the appellant prays for direction to maintain status .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 2005 (TRI)

Reliance Industries Ltd. Vs. Ddi (international

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-08-2005

Reported in : (2005)3SOT501(Mum.)

..... the language of section 10(2)(vi), cannot be accepted as a rule made for carrying out the purposes of the act; indeed, such a rule may be regarded as patently violative of the purposes of the act, i.e., of section 10(2)." (v) hyderabad asbestos cement products ltd's case (supra) wherein the hon'ble court at page nos .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 2005 (TRI)

Reliance Industries Ltd. Vs. Deputy Director of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-08-2005

Reported in : (2005)98TTJ(Mum.)856

..... the language of section 10(2)(vi), cannot be accepted as a rule made for carrying out the purposes of the act; indeed, such a rule may be regarded as patently vioiative of the purposes of the act, i.e., of section 10(2)." (v) hyderabad asbestos cement products ltd.'s case (supra), wherein the hon'ble court at, page nos .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 2005 (TRI)

Essar Oil Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-21-2005

Reported in : (2006)102TTJ(Mum.)614

..... of the term 'international traffic'. only where the ship is operated 'solely' between places in the other contracting state it looses the character of ship in 'international traffic'. this is patent from the language of the definition of 'international traffic'.14. shri mehta relied on the commentary brought out by philip baker in "double taxation convention and international tax law" in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 07 2005 (TRI)

Cybertech Systems and Software Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-07-2005

Reported in : (2007)106TTJ(Mum.)257

..... trained at the cybertec advanced learning centre.10. in contemplation of the activities proposed, the assessee-company had imported a computer software called sap (systems application and products). the software patented as sap is owned by a german company sap ag. the german company has sold number of licenced copies of sap software. but, the german company does not have the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 25 2005 (HC)

Maharastra Agro Industries Development Corporation Ltd. and ors. Vs. S ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-25-2005

Reported in : (2006)3LLJ102Bom

..... producers. the court will, of course, examine if there is any hostile discrimination. that is a different 'cup of tea' altogether.32. the learned counsel argued that there were several patent errors which came to light during the course of the hearing in the high court. he said that obsolete quantitative usages had been taken into consideration, proximate cost data had .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2005 (TRI)

Oboi Laboratories Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-09-2005

..... are that the appellant manufactures two medicaments, viz. obroquin injection 30 ml and cloroquine phosphate injection 30 ml. the appellant filed a classification list claiming classification of the goods as patent and proprietary medicines under heading 3003.10 of the schedule to the central excise tariff act. the appellant is mainly exporting the goods. the department's contention is that the ..... .10, the commissioner classified them under heading 3003.20.4. we have perused the labels filed along with the appeal papers and find that in one of the products the patented name "obroquin" is conspicuously mentioned on the label. in so far as the other product in question is concerned, it does not carry any house name. the commissioner's contention .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //