Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: mumbai Year: 2005 Page 8 of about 154 results (0.011 seconds)

Jan 06 2005 (TRI)

Siemens Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-06-2005

Reported in : (2005)(99)ECC449

..... of customs, mumbai vide other orders dated 25^th september 1991 and 31^st july 1998, respectively finalised the valuations after detailed study.the appellants are not paying any royalty, patent fee, license fees, know-how fees or any other payment for the products being manufactured in their existing manufacturing unit and there has been no change in the circumstances that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2005 (TRI)

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Mecnair Exports Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-18-2005

..... has not given any finding in regard to liability of the goods to confiscation but determined the quantum of penalty on the applicants. this according to the applicants is a patent error on the part of the tribunal. it is also submitted that when the tribunal remanded the matter it should have directed the lower authority to re-determine the penalty .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 2005 (TRI)

Yucca Finvest (P.) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-25-2005

Reported in : (2006)101ITD403(Mum.)

..... commissioner of income-tax (appeals) ought to have borne in mind the general commercial principles in order to arrive at the real and true profits of the business. it is patently unfair and unjust to expect an assessee who has incurred a loss in his business during the year to pay tax on the dividend income earned by him particularly when .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 2005 (HC)

Villa Moda General Trading Co. W.L.L. and anr. Vs. Chordia Fashions Pv ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-01-2005

Reported in : 2005(3)BomCR41

..... , the defendant proceeds on the assumption that all facts pleaded by the plaintiff are true and correct. this exception of course, would be limited when the same facts are so patently wrong or incorrect that no reasonable person is likely to believe in their existence. 4. since the defendant had chosen to proceed by way of demurrer to oppose the ad .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 25 2005 (HC)

Vibha Synthetics Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-25-2005

Reported in : (2006)ILLJ895Bom; 2005(4)MhLj1111

..... producers. the court will, of course, examine if there is any hostile discrimination. that is a different 'cup of tea' altogether.''32. the learned counsel argued that there were several patent errors which came to light during the course of the hearing in the high court. he said that obsolete quantitative usages had been taken into consideration, proximate cost data had .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2005 (HC)

Kamal D/O Bansidhar Ghatol Vs. Sawate Education Society and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-19-2005

Reported in : 2006(2)ALLMR64; 2006(2)MhLj675

..... pay-scale of rs. 200-450/- (revised rs. 1500-2640/-) a learned single judge of the punjab and haryana high court and answered the question in the affirmative. the letters patent bench has upheld the judgment of the learned single judge. this appeal by way of special leave was against the judgments of the high court. said question is answered in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 2005 (TRI)

Metchem Canada Inc. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-30-2005

Reported in : (2006)100ITD251(Mum.)

..... the pe to the head office of the enterprise or any of its other offices, by way of royalties, fees or other similar payments in return for the use of patents, know-how or other rights, or by way of commission or other charges, for specific services performed or for management, or, except in the case of a banking enterprise, by ..... the pe to the head office of the enterprise or any of its other offices, by way of royalties, fees or other similar payments in return for the use of patents, know-how or other rights, or by way of commission or other charges for specific services performed or for management, or, except in the case of a banking enterprise, by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 2005 (HC)

Sangeeta Peplo Gaude and ors. Vs. Tulshidas Bablo Gad and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-04-2005

Reported in : 2005(4)BomCR242

..... to both the parties.records and proceeding may be called.'4. mr. sonak, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, submitted that the impugned order passed by respondent no. 3, is patently without jurisdiction. according to the learned counsel for the petitioners, the meeting for electing the sarpanch and deputy sarpanch of the said panchayat has been already fixed on 9th february ..... order in an election petition when the director of panchayats had fixed the election of sarpanch and deputy sarpanch on 9th february, 2005. in my view, the impugned order is patently without jurisdiction and, as such, although it is an interim order, interference by this court is called for.6. in my view, respondent no. 3 has erred in exercising jurisdiction .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 2005 (HC)

Annappa Satu Mane Vs. Tajani Balu Shinde and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-23-2005

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR975; 2006(1)BomCR264; (2005)107BOMLR218; 2006(1)MhLj333

..... suit for injunction should be deferred any further due to the non-availability of the original papers in the revenue proceedings. 19. the impugned order suffers from a clear and patent error of reasoning in so far as it operates to quash the order of regrant made in favour of the petitioner. the petitioner had filed an appeal before the state ..... . there is, therefore, merit in the submission that the finding of the officer on special duty to the effect that the appeal was not maintainable suffered from a clear and patent error. 18. the officer on special duty has in the course of his impugned order rendered a finding in regard to the merits of the entitlement of the first respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 08 2005 (HC)

Shri Chatrapati Shivaji Mahavidyalaya Vs. Mansingh S/O Dhondiba Shitol ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-08-2005

Reported in : 2006(1)ALLMR331; 2005(4)MhLj1095

..... was not in accordance with the advertisement dated 23-5-1988, whereby the post was reserved for backward class candidate. shri kulkarni, submitted that the order of the tribunal being patently erroneous and illegal, this court under article 227 of the constitution of india, should interfere in the said order. lastly, shri kulkarni, contended that even if this court comes to ..... the appellant cannot be considered for being appointed as a lecturer in the said college. lastly, shri kulkarni, contended that the order of reinstatement with payment of backwages is thus patently illegal as the appellant has no cause or right to make any complaint about the order of termination. he submitted all the three appointment orders which are issued by the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //