Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: orissa Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 16 results (0.026 seconds)

Jul 15 1986 (HC)

Dandapani Naik Vs. State of Orissa Represented by the Collector and an ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jul-15-1986

Reported in : 1986(II)OLR391

..... , on the basis of findings recorded by the courts below, can ultimately decide the question of adverse possession.8. on consideration of the averments made in the plaint it is patent from paragraphs 3, 4, 5 and 6 that the plaintiff has asserted his possession of the suit land, as well as, acquisition of the right of an occupancy raiyat in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 1986 (HC)

Ramesh Samal and ors. Vs. Chabi Mandal and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Nov-05-1986

Reported in : 63(1987)CLT204; 1987CriLJ759

..... 'interlocutory order' is a term of well-knowti legal significance and does not present any serious difficulty. it has been used in various statutes including the civil p.c., letters patent of the high courts and other like statutes. in webster's new world dictionary 'interlocutory' has been defined as an order other than final decision. decided cases have laid down .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 03 1986 (HC)

Smt. Sulochana Sahu Vs. Baman Ch. Sahu

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-03-1986

Reported in : 1986(I)OLR558

..... , in a legal proceeding of this nature, it was not possible on his part to properly defend himself against the petitioner's claim. in view of these facts which are patent on the records of the case, i do not propose to take a view contrary to the one taken by the learned court below, i therefore with him that good .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 1986 (HC)

State of Orissa Vs. Dolagobinda Nanda

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jul-29-1986

Reported in : 62(1986)CLT307; 1986(II)OLR333

..... to manufacture stock and sell drugs. the respondent in this case had stocked 49 items of drugs which were seized from him. all of them were patent medicines. the prosecution was lodged in the year 1975 and a decade has already elapsed. at this distant point of time sentence of heavy imprisnment is ..... at page 21 of the air manual vol. 16, 4th edn.). it has been found on scrutiny of oral and documentary evidence that 49 items of patent medicines which were drugs were stocked by the respondent in his clinic. in his statement under section 313 of the code the respondent stated that he ..... the prosecution proved the seizure of the drugs from the clinic of the respondent who had neither a licence for stocking drugs in the shape of patent allopathic medicines nor could produce the purchase invoices to show the names and addresses of the persons from whom he acquired the same. he was also ..... w 1) raided and searched the clinic and found that the respondent was in possession of drugs (m. os. i to xliv) in the shape of patent medicines for sale. the drugs were seized by seizure list (ext. 1) in the presence of independent witnesses. the respondent was asked to produce the drug licence ..... warner, item no. 10 livomyne syrup manufactured by charak pharmaceutical, bombay, item no. 11 denmo quino, manufactured by east india pharmaceutical and many other patent medicines manuf- actured by different drugs manufacturers of, india and abroad. it is, therefore, beyond the pale of any controversy that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 1986 (HC)

Tulsidas Modi and anr. Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Mar-10-1986

Reported in : 1986(I)OLR415

..... if such person in a case of this nature are brought before the court to suffer the agony of a protracted trial. therefore, although they have not approached this court patently on account of poverty, in exercise of inherent powers under section 482 of the code i deem it expedient to quash the charges against them. 10. before parting with the ..... the charge-sheet that two employees of petitioner no. 1 named, pramod kumar swain and ram chandra jena were implicated as co-accused and further charges were framed against them. patently, they had nothing to do with the sale of kerosene. they were mere employees who carried out orders of their master and could not deny to do so if they .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 03 1986 (HC)

Nara Raghava Rao Vs. Nadiabasi Biswas

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-03-1986

Reported in : AIR1986Ori255

..... not allege any corrupt practice. section 83 does not mandate that every election petition should be supported by affidavit irrespective of whether there are allegations of corrupt practice or not. patently, therefore, it cannot be said that the petitioner did not comply with the mandatory provisions of section 83(1).39. the objection of the stamp reporter refers to rule 3 ..... date for presentation of the election petition was 20-4-85.20-4-85 and 21-4-85 being holiday the election petition was presented on 22-4-85. so patently it was presented within the period of limitation of 45 days prescribed in section 81(3) of the act.37. according to section 83(1)(c) and its proviso, every .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 1986 (HC)

Bichitrananda SwaIn Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Dec-22-1986

Reported in : 63(1987)CLT266; 1988CriLJ292

..... by the drugs inspector (p.w. 1) and a sub-inspector of police of sadar police station (p.w. 3) and a huge quantity of drugs in the shape of patent medicines, vials of injections and ampules were seized from the said premises from the possession of the petitioner in the presence of the witnesses as per seizure list (ext. 1 ..... .w. 1. the prosecution report is ext. 17 which was signed on 27-7-1978 and was sent to the sadar police station on 31-7-1978. so it is patent that the prosecution report duly submitted by the inspector of drugs (p.w. 1) found its way to the court of the judicial magistrate along with the charge-sheet. it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 1986 (HC)

Dayanidhi Misra Vs. Ramachandra Misra Alias Chandra Sekhar Mishra

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-19-1986

Reported in : 63(1987)CLT65; 1986(II)OLR507

..... , 928) relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner is entirely on different facts, namely, allowing the time spent for obtaining the copy of judgment for filing a letters patent appeal.13. as a result of the above discussion, it must be held that the suit for recovery of the loan by a money-lender has got to be filed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 22 1986 (HC)

Chhaila Pradhan and State of Orissa Vs. Bansidhar Pradhan and Two ors. ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-22-1986

Reported in : 62(1986)CLT699; 1986(II)OLR520

..... of the new code in such a manner would be an obvious and perverse reading of the section and such a reading of the section would result in grave and patent miscarriage of justice.as held by the kerala high court in 1984 (ii) crimes 327 (supra), a bail order granted by a sessions judge improperly should be cancelled by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 22 1986 (HC)

Bathula Krishna Rao and ors. Vs. Pininti Mahalakshmi and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-22-1986

Reported in : 1986(II)OLR575

..... with the accident while getting down from the bus in question. this finding, although attempted to be assailed, has not been differed by the learned single judge. in the letters patent jurisdiction, it is not possible to re-appraise the evidence, which the learned counsel for the appellants wants us to do. on the finding that papayya was still in the ..... h.l. agrawal, c.j. and b.k. behera, j.1. these two appeals under the letters patent jurisdiction of this court, which arise out of a common judgment, were heard together and are being disposed of by this order.2. these appeals arise out of a claim .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //