Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: orissa Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 12 results (0.027 seconds)

Nov 11 2004 (HC)

Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Subhra Mohanty an ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Nov-11-2004

Reported in : I(2005)ACC418; 2006ACJ501; 99(2005)CLT7

..... such question having not been raised before the hon'ble single judge, the appellant cannot raise the same in a letters patent appeal. apart from the above, on merits also it appears that the tribunal while computing the salary and loss of dependency has taken note of the ratio laid down by ..... and with the aforesaid direction and observation the appeal was dismissed. it is clear from the judgment of the hon'ble single judge that the question raised in this letters patent appeal was never raised before the hon'ble single judge. we, therefore, considering the findings of the learned tribunal as well as the above fact, are of the view that ..... preferred an appeal before this court vide m.a. no. 716 of 2001. the said appeal was dismissed by judgment dated 29th august, 2003 giving rise to the present letters patent appeal. the sole ground on which the learned counsel for the appellant challenges the judgment and order of the hon'ble single judge is that while computing loss of dependency ..... others v. united india insurance co. ltd. and anr. (supra) relied upon by the learned counsel for the appellant.4. accordingly, we do not find any merit in this letters patent appeal and the same is dismissed.a.k. samantray, j.5. i agree. ..... l. mohapatra, j.1. this letters patent appeal is directed against the judgment dated 29th august, 2003 passed by the hon'ble single judge in misc. appeal no. 716 of 2001 dismissing the appeal.2. the respondents .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 18 2004 (HC)

Babaji Charan Sahu and ors. Vs. Rajendra Narayan Dash and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jun-18-2004

Reported in : AIR2004Ori160; 98(2004)CLT526

..... legal heirs and successors of the original plaintiff nityananda sahu in title suit no. 163 of 1969 instituted in the court of the subordinate judge, cuttack have preferred this letters patent appeal being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 8th september, 1988 passed by a learned single judge of this court in first appeal no. 188 of 1974.2. the ..... and decree passed by the court below and dismissed the suit. the said judgment and decree passed by the learned single judge of this court are impugned in this letters patent appeal as stated above.9. the findings of the trial court on almost all the issues stands confirmed having not been challenged before the first appellate court. the only issue .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 2004 (HC)

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Dinabandhu Nayak and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jan-21-2004

Reported in : I(2005)ACC539; 2006ACJ585; 2004(I)OLR292

..... allowed in part and the compensation of rs. 1,00,000/- was enhanced to rs. 1,90,000/- but the appeal filed by the insurance company was dismissed. these letters patent appeals have been preferred by the insurance company being aggrieved by the said common judgment.3. 6. the moot question which needs to be determined in these appeals is whether .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 2004 (HC)

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Vs. Trinath Singh

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Aug-06-2004

Reported in : AIR2005Ori70; 2005(2)ARBLR593(Orissa); 98(2004)CLT665

..... the agreement provides for recovery at double the rate and there was hardly any scope for the arbitrator to allow single recovery and, therefore the award is patently illegal in respect of claim item no. 1. from the award itself it appears that a clam was made by the appellant that the claimant-respondent ..... examine the award to find out as to whether the award in respect of any item of claim is against the fundamental policy of indian law or patently illegal. so far as first item of claim is concerned, it appears from the award that the claimant-respondent had claimed rs. 49,721/-and ..... the light of the decision of the apex court, it will be found that neither the award is against the fundamental policy of indian law nor patently illegal.9. considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties as well as the ratio laid down by the apex court in ..... act have been discussed and the scope has been extended in the aforesaid case and, therefore the award being against the fundamental policy of indian law and patently illegal, the same should be set aside. shri sangnaria, learned counsel appearing for the respondent contended that if the award passed by the arbitrator is examined ..... that the award in respect of some items of claim are against the fundamental policy of indian law and award in respect of some items of claim are patently illegal. referring to the ratio laid down in the case of oil and natural gas corporation ltd. v. saw pipes ltd. (supra), the learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 14 2004 (HC)

Dr. Lata Kumari Bhol Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Oct-14-2004

Reported in : 99(2005)CLT125

..... the employees on consideration of their respective qualification and experience etc. in absence of any statutory rules to that effect. the state government cannot alter it unless there is a patent injustice in the decision of the governing body. in the instant case, before reciving the grant-in-aid the college took the decision as per annexure-5 in the year .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 2004 (HC)

Lalita Dash Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Mar-26-2004

Reported in : 2004(I)OLR619

..... the enquiry was conducted, that too behind the back of the petitioner, and also the grounds on which the petitioner's service was terminated. 6. in view of the aforesaid patent irregularities the order of termination of the services of the petitioner cannot be sustained and accordingly the order dated 11.8.1999, annexure-5 is quashed. 7. but then, fact .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 28 2004 (HC)

Pradeep Kumar Medini Roy Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jun-28-2004

Reported in : 2004CriLJ3655

..... was entrusted to investigate into the case by the state government, resultantly, the notification issued withdrawing the consent to enable the state police to further investigate into the case is patently invalid and unsustainable in law. in view of this finding of ours we need not go into the questions, whether section 21 of the general clauses act applies to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 2004 (HC)

National Highway Authority of India and ors. Vs. Bumihiway Ddb Ltd. (J ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Nov-02-2004

Reported in : 2005(1)ARBLR157(Orissa); I(2005)BC486; 99(2005)CLT18

..... the same to the dispute review board, and if necessary, to arbitration thereafter. according to mr. mohanty the mala fide of the n. h. authority is very much apparent and patently visible from the facts that though the firm requested or called upon it to constitute a disputes review board in consonance with the terms of the agreement, no action was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 2004 (HC)

Branch Manager, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Sakuntala Chhotra ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jan-09-2004

Reported in : I(2005)ACC558; 2006ACJ870; 97(2004)CLT741; 2004(I)OLR269

..... of any driving licence of the driver the liability should be borne by the owner of the vehicle and not by the insurance company cannot be considered at this letters patent stage, inasmuch as no specific issue was framed by the tribunal regarding inter se liability of the insurance company vis-a-vis the owner of the vehicle. section 149(4 ..... a.s. naidu, j. 1. all these three letters patent appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 15.3.2000 passed by a learned single judge of this court in m. a. no. 821 of 1997 and m. a. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 24 2004 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Prafulla Kumar Mohanty and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jun-24-2004

Reported in : IV(2005)ACC166

a.s. naidu, j.1. this letters patent appeal has been filed by the appellant insurance company inter alia challenging the judgment dated 11 th july, 2001 passed by a learned single judge of this court in miscellaneous .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //