Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: patna Year: 1964 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.025 seconds)

Aug 25 1964 (HC)

Phul Kumari Devi Vs. Sambhu Prasad Singh and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-25-1964

Reported in : AIR1965Pat87

..... must be decided in favour of the appellant41. mr. lal narain sinha has, however raised a question of res judicata. learned counsel contends that the effect of dismissal of letters patent appeal no. 120 of 1958, which had been filed by defendants 3 to 7 against the decision of the learned single fudge in f.a. no. 153 of 1951, would ..... this deed is that the remaining co-sharers have relinquished all interest in the properties which was (were) owned and possessed by a particular co-sharer."this view, however, is patently wrong. there is no basis for making an assumption that nanku (plff. no. 1) had some antecedent title in the house. undoubtedly, it was the self-acquired property of amar ..... the three points urged before him in favour of the plaintiffs, and as such having upheld the decree of the trial court, two appeals under clause 10 of the letters patent were preferred against his judgment. the appeal of defendant no. 1, which was numbered as l. p. a. no. 119 of 1998, is the present appeal. the appeal filed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //