Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 10,204 results (0.020 seconds)

Aug 01 1984 (HC)

Madura Coats Limited and ors. Vs. Chetan Dev

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1985P& H43

..... the patents act, 1970 (act 39 of 1970) was, in substance, the same in its content, as s. 120 of the act, and provided for the remedy ..... an action for interim injunction restraining the defendant from holding out threats, the plaintiff must state that he has not infringed the patent of the defendant in order to give him the right of action. whether he has infringed the patent or not would be a matter which would have to be adjudicated upon in due course, but there must be at ..... least a clear statement to that effect. in the above said case, the suit was brought under s. 36 of the patents and designs act, 1911, which, before its repeal by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 1970 (HC)

NagIn Chand Vs. Shadi Lal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1970P& H522

..... reputation of a business and where the product of the business more than its proprietor have won widespread popularity and universal approval and except in the case of well-known patents and manufacturing processes in which event the personal and objective reputations predominate, it is the local reputation or the attribute of locality which forms the largest content of goodwill in ..... lal appellant was the owner after the 31st march 1959.' as stated, il is the appellant in each appeal who has come in appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent from the judgment and decree of the learned single judge dismissing his suit. 3. it is clear from what has already been staled that the facts are not in dispute ..... mehar singh, c.j. 1. this will dispose of two appeals nos. 273 and 274 of 1964, under clause 10 of the letters patent, the first by nagin chand and the second by ramesh chand to which the main opposite party is their third brother shadi lal respondent, from the judgment and decree, dated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 2013 (HC)

“at the Time of My Marriage My Patents Have Spent 2 Lacs Rupees as P ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... legally barred under section 397(3) cr.pc, in the garb of petition under section 482 cr.pc, unless and until, the same are illegal and perverse. since no such patent illegality or legal infirmity has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioners, so, the impugned fir (annexure p2), order/charge sheet (annexure p4) and judgment (annexure p6 ..... account of demand of dowry are assigned to the petitioners. the complainant, inter-alia, claimed in the impugned fir (annexure p2) as under:- at the time of my marriage my patents have spent 2 lacs rupees as per their capacity and the list of gift-dowry articles given at the time of marriage is attached with this complainant. out of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 10 2000 (HC)

Hari Singh Nalwa Vs. Kartar Singh Bhadana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR2001P& H86

..... , court has to adopt purposive approach in interpreting such a statute. it may be appropriate to mention that in the judgment of eastman photographic materials co. v. controller general of patents, designs and trade marks, reported in 1898 ac 571 page 576 wherein the earls of halsbury reaffirmed the rule as follows :-'my lords, it appears to me that to construe .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 2014 (HC)

Coram: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia Vs. the Union of ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... opd attendance the previous calendar year was taken into consideration with students/patients ratio required being 1 :2. in the opd( i.e. for intake capacity of 50 students :100. patents per day). the kumar pardeep 2014.02.20 09:25 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh cwp no.23288 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2014 (HC)

Seth Nand Lal Bajaj Educational Charitable Society Chandigarh Vs. Stat ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... of 2013 (o & m) and connected matters -12- been brought to our notice. . in skinner & co.versus shew and co.(1893) 1 ch 413, words of section 32 of the patents, designs & trade marks act, 1883 are to the following effect:- where any person claiming to be the patentee of any invention, by circulars.advertisements or otherwise threatens any other person .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2014 (HC)

Veena Setia and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... their appointment is in accordance with the statutory rules. counsel for the petitioners has also, at this stage, referred to the judgment passed by the division bench in the letter patents appeal preferred by the state which is reported as state of haryana & others versus surindra kumar mishra & others.2013 (1) sct563where in para 6, he contends, that the division bench .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 2013 (HC)

High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Vs. Pritpaljit Singh Sangha . . .

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... ?. **** present: ms.munisha gandhi, addl. ag punjab for appellant mr.hps ghuman, advocate for respondent no.1 ***** surya kant j. (oral) (1).the state of punjab has instituted this letter patents appeal against the order dated december 13, 2012 passed by learned single judge whereby cwp no.10898 of 2012 preferred by the firs.respondent has been allowed and while setting .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 20 1968 (HC)

Shanthi Saroop Sharma and anr. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1969P& H79

..... to mean:-'a payment made to the landowner by the lessee of a mine in return for the privilege of working it. a sum paid to the proprietor of a patented invention for the use of it. a payment made to an author, editor, or composer for each copy of a book, piece of music, etc., sold by the publisher, or ..... of the property leased, or otherwise on the profits of the grant or lease. the word is specially used in reference to mines patents and copyrights.'18. according to prem's judicial dictionary (volume iv ), 1964 edition, page 1457:---'royalty is inter alia, a charge by the owner of minerals from those to whom ..... v. mackenzie, (1900) ac 83, cited rent; listowel v. gibbings, (1858-9 ir clr 223) sup.; or the agreed payment to a patentee on every article made according to the patent.'17. the meaning given to royalty in mozley and whiteley's law dictionary (7th edition) page 328 is:--'a pro rata payment to a grantor or lessor on the working ..... that case.'15. in wharton's law lexicon (14th edition) it is stated at page 893:--'royalty , payment to a patentee by agreement on every article made according to his patent; or to an author by a publisher on every copy of his book sold; or to the owner of minerals for the right of working the same on every ton .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 04 1957 (HC)

Sardar Kapur Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1957P& H173

..... is merely advisory, made by the court in exercise of its consultative jurisdiction and is not a judgment within the meaning of clause 15 of the letters patent'.49. in another madras case chandanmull and co. v. mohanlal mehta, air 1953 mad 727 (z33), it was held that it is only a ..... final and preliminary judgments thus defined all other decisions are 'orders' and they do not come within the description of judgments under the relevant clause of the letters patent'.47. the bombay high court in jamnadas prabhudas v. commr. of income tax, bombay city, ilr 1953 bom 549: (air 1952 bom 479) (z31), ..... judicial opinion was pointed out but the meaning of the word 'judgment' within clause 15 of the letters patent was not decided. mukherjea j. observed at p. 824 (of sca): (at p. 199 of sc):''a final judgment is an adjudication which conclusively detennines ..... article'.46. in asrumati debi v. rupendra deb, 1953 sca 319: (air 1953 sc 198) (z30), an order under clause 13 of the letters patent of the calcutta high court transferring a suit from a subordinate court to the high court was held not to be a judgment. although the divergence of ..... and conferment of the jurisdiction on the federal court to that court could be taken against a 'decree or final order'. similar appeals under the letters patents of the various high courts were provided against final judgment, decree or order. if there had been no decision interpreting these words in section 205 of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //