Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: punjab and haryana Page 14 of about 10,204 results (0.019 seconds)

Jun 30 1954 (HC)

Prof. Ram Kumar Luthra Vs. Punjab University, Solan and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1954P& H253

..... . 2 of 1953 with costs.7. from the judgment given in civil writ (application) no. 2 of 1953 professor ram kumar has come up under paragraph 10 of the letters patent.8. in -- 'k. s. rashid and son v. income-tax investigation commission', air 1964 sc 207 (a), b. k. mukherja j. delivering the judgment of the court said--'there are ..... harnam singh, j.1. in order to appreciate the point that arises for decision in letters patent appeal no. 34 of 1953 it is necessary to set out the facts of the case in some detail.2. by notification made on 30-8-1949, the chancellor of ..... . 2 of 1953.10. finding, as i do, that civil writ (application) no 2 of 1953 was not competent under article 226 of the constitution. i dismiss with costs letters patent appeal no. 34 of 1953.kapur, j.11. i agree. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 16 1962 (HC)

Piara Singh Sardar Dasaundha Singh Vs. the Punjab State and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1962P& H498

..... has been heard by a learned single judge before whom no such objection appears to have been raised an has now came before us under clause 10 of the letters patent, it will be just and expedient to exercise our powers under article 226 of the constitution because respondent no. 4 has absolutely no right to continue as a primary member ..... a.n. grover, j.(1) this is an appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent against an order of a learned single judge of this court dismissing a petition under article 226 of the constitution.(2) the petition was filed by piara singh who is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 07 1961 (HC)

Dev Prakash Balmukand Vs. Babu Ram Rewti Mal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1961P& H429

dulat, j. 1. this is an appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent against a judgment of mahajan, j., setting aside the entire election to the municipal committee of nuh on a petition under article 226 of the constitution. the appellant is a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 1972 (HC)

The Amritsar Central Co-operative Store Ltd. Vs. Ram Kishan Mehra and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1973P& H342

..... certain reliefs were granted to them by the learned single judge. both the writ petitions were disposed of by one judgment and that is the reason why these two letters patent appeals are being disposed of by one judgment. the facts pleaded in both the cases are the same.2. on april 26, 1963. shri p. n. bhalla, district magistrate, amritsar ..... filed in this court which were decided by the learned single judge by order dated january 31, 1972. the present appeals have been filed under clause 10 of the letters patent by the amritsar central co-operative consumers store limited amritsar.4. it is not necessary to discuss all the points involved in the case as all of them have not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 1972 (HC)

Kartar Singh Vs. Lal Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1972P& H385

1. these three letters patent appeals (l. p. as 157 and 187 of 1970, and l. p. a. 582 of 1971) arise out of the decision of two different writ petitions by a learned single .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 1966 (HC)

Punjab State and ors. Vs. Sukh Dev Sarup Gupta

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1967P& H416; [1966]18STC426(P& H)

h.r. khanna, j.1. this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent by the punjab state and two others is directed against the order of learned single judge whereby he accepted the petition under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 1972 (HC)

inspector General of Police, Punjab and ors. Vs. Amrik Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1973P& H314

1. this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent is directed against the judgment of the learned single judge allowing the writ petition of amrik singh (c.w. no. 80 of 1969) by order dated july 20, 1971.2. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 22 1961 (HC)

Custodian General, Evacuee Property, New Delhi and ors. Vs. Shanti Sar ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1961P& H497

..... persuaded me to change my view.14. for the reasons stated above, the decision of the learned single judge under appeal deserves to be reversed. in the result, the letters patent appeal is allowed and the civil writ no. 125 of 1958 is dismissed. in the circumstances of the case, the parties are left to bear their own costs throughout.falshaw ..... bishan narain j. in gulzar singh v. custodian, evacuee property, punjab, jullundur, civil writ no. 525 of 1956, d/- 20-5-1957 (punj). the appeal was taken to the letters patent bench consisting of the honourable the chief justice and myself l.p.a. no. 153 of 1957, d/. 21-12-1959 (punj) and we endorsed the view expressed by the ..... being debarred to be evacuee property having been declared as such within the meaning of the act, an appeal from this order of groyer j. was taken to the letters patent bench in r. l. aggarwal v. darshan lal asa ram, air 1960 punj 612. the appeal was no doubt dismissed by the letters ..... patent bench though on grounds different from those which prevailed with the learned single judge.9. this matter has now been examined by the supreme court in azimunnissa v. deputy custodian, ..... tek chand, j.1. this is a letters patent appeal from the judgment of a learned single judge allowing writ petition in c.w. 125/1958 made under article 226 of the constitution.2. the facts of this case .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 1959 (HC)

Mian Ajmer Singh Vs. Mukandi Lal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1959P& H521

..... as raised by the judgment-debtor. the learned judge, there-fore, dismissed the appeal with costs. mian ajmer singh has now filed an appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent. 3. the direction of law contained in section 11 of the punjab debtors' protection act is clear and it forbids a court from making any order on any execution application .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 1982 (HC)

Ludhiana Improvement Trust, Ludhiana Vs. Nirmal Devi and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1983P& H193

..... to the entire land within the municipals limits of ludhiana including the acquired land is dispute relating to gill road development scheme.14. in view of discussion above the letters patent appeal is accepted, the impugned order of the learned single judge dated aug. 21, 1980 set aside the further c. w. p. no. 3829 of 1971 is dismissed with no ..... an urban character and had indeed ceased to be rural or agricultural in nature. its potentiality for development as residential colonies within the municipal limits of ludhiana is thus too patent to deserve any great elaboration.' 13. it is evident that the findings of facts recorded in lakshmi dass's case (1977 pun lj 464)(supra) relates to land acquired in ..... writ jurisdiction cannot assume the role of an appellate court. the high court exercising its supervisory powers can look into the errors of law or the other findings which are patently perverse on the fact of it. it further remains beyond the jurisdiction of the high court to undertake evaluation of the merits on its own.10. the tribunal has given ..... the date of taking possession of the land till its payment. the trust has assailed the order of the learned single judge dated aug. 21, 1980, in the present letters patent appeal.3. the learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the value of the acquired land had been correctly assessed by the land acquisition collector and the tribunal and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //