Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: punjab and haryana Page 14 of about 10,205 results (0.020 seconds)

Feb 12 1957 (HC)

State of Punjab Vs. S. Sukhbans Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1957P& H191

..... provisions of article 311 of the constitution. the stats is dissatisfied with the order of the learned single judge and has preferred an appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent.3. the petitioner was promoted to the provincial civil service under the provisions 6f the punjab civil service (executive branch) rules 1930. these rules empower the governor of the punjab .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 1969 (HC)

Daulat Ram Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1969P& H396

..... terminate his services on the precedent of kotkapura once again at rajpura or appoint him somewhere else. we want to make it clear that the question raised in the letters patent appeal is left open, should it arise in a suitable case. we are only concerned with the present appeal which we think has become wholly infrustuous. it will always be ..... at rajpura for the remaining period of the original term of appointment which was to expire on 6th of february, 1968. 2. the writ petition giving rise to this letters patent appeal was thereafter filed on 24th april , 1965. this was dismissed by pandit, j. on 13th october, 1965. as the question involved the correctness of a division bench decision of ..... shamsher bahadur, j.1. this letters patent appeal from the order of pandit appeal from the order of pandit , j. was admitted for hearing before a full bench on 19th january, 1966. it arises out of a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 06 1960 (HC)

Dr. Tilak Raj Chadha Vs. Chief Commissioner, Delhi and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1961P& H275

..... , leaves no room for doubt on the point at issue. moreover, this point was not taken before the chief commissioner and cannot, therefore, be agitated in this court in letters patent appeal. 8. the second point raised by the appellant's counsel was that the chief commissioner could not go beyond his jurisdiction to pass the impugned order under section 237 ..... . 458-d of 1957 under article 226 of the constitution which was dismissed by mehar singh j., on 23rd may, 1958. it is against this order that the present letters patent appeal has been put in. 6. the appeal was argued by the parties ai considerable length. the appellant's counsel raised before us the same points which he had also .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 1951 (HC)

Nidhan Singh Vs. Sadha Lal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1952P& H222

..... in the argument is that if s. a. o. no. 6/e. of 1947 was not competent the case does not fall under clause 10 of the letters patent. i do not accept the validity of the objection raised.13. section 4 of the act reads:'subject to the provisions of this act, the court shall have full ..... competency of the letters patent appeal. the objection proceeds on the argument that the order passed by the additional district judge on the 29th of may 1947, does not come within section 4 of ..... 1947, the insolvent appealed in the high court, but that appeal was dismissed with costs.11. in these circumstances nidhan singh insolvent appeals under clause 19 of the letters patent from the judgment of mr. justice falshaw passed on the 11th of august 1948.12. mr. dwarka nath aggarwal appearing for 'shri' sadda lal respondent objects to the ..... 6/e of 1947, was competent and the case having been certified to be a fit one for appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent the objection as to the competency of letters patent appeal no. 73 of 1948 is without any force.15. mr. dwarka nath aggarwal contends that in the case of auction-sales by the collector ..... harnam singh, j.1. in order to appreciate the point of law arising in letters patent appeal no. 73 of 1943 it is necessary to set out the facts of the case in some detail.2. nidhan singh appellant was adjudicated insolvent on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 07 1970 (HC)

Additional Director (i) Consolidation of Holdings, Punjab and anr. Vs. ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1970P& H554

..... limitation by a party which could have done so would be a bar to the certiorari petition made to quash such an order. the bench held that except for a patent or inherent defect of jurisdiction, an objection which would oust the jurisdiction of a quasi-judicial tribunal ought to be raised in the first instance before the tribunal itself. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 1957 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Shree Ram Kanwar and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1958P& H365

..... respects amended and altered thereby.'it is immediately clear that the powers of the high court to make rules under clause 27 of the letters patent are subject to the legislative powers of the legislature, and if the rule conflicts with any law made by the legislature, it obviously cannot be ..... (2) of the limitation act observed --'the question therefore seems to me to be whether the rules made by a high court under its letters patent and by virtue of the civil procedure code amount to a special or local law. in my opinion they do not. i think that the expression 'special ..... for india, to all proceedings in its testamentary, intestate and matrimonial jurisdiction respectively.'the question is whether rules made in accordance with these provisions of the letters patent are a 'special law' within the scope of section 29 (2) of the limitation act?13. this question was considered by cunliffe j., in ..... grants further time for the presentation. .........'this rule has been made by the high court in pursuance of clauses 10 and 27 of the letters patent. clause 10 relates to appeals from judgment of a single judge to the high court and clause 27 relates to regulation of proceedings. it provides:' ..... so far as it is relevant for the present purpose, runs thus --'rule 4. no memorandum of appeal preferred under clause 10 of the letters patent shall be entertained if presented after the expiration of 30 days from the date of the judgment appealed from, unless the admitting bench in its discretion .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 1974 (HC)

Sardara Singh and anr. Vs. Harbhajan Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1974P& H345

..... was overruled by the learned single judge. the result was that the appeal was dismissed. the learned single judge, however, granted the necessary certificate under clause x of the letters patent and that is how the present appeal has been preferred.4. the same contention that was advanced before the learned single judge has been advanced before us. it may be ..... mahajan, c.j.1. this is an appeal under clause x of the letters patent and is directed against the decision of a learned single judge of this court affirming on appeal the decision of the lower appellate court reversing the decision of the trial .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 03 1966 (HC)

State of Punjab Vs. Parsa Singh Teji

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1967P& H238

h.r. khanna, j.1. this appeal under clause x of the letters patent by the state of punjab is directed against the order of the learned single judge whereby he accepted the petition under article 226 of the constitution of india filed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 30 1954 (HC)

Prof. Ram Kumar Luthra Vs. Punjab University, Solan and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1954P& H253

..... . 2 of 1953 with costs.7. from the judgment given in civil writ (application) no. 2 of 1953 professor ram kumar has come up under paragraph 10 of the letters patent.8. in -- 'k. s. rashid and son v. income-tax investigation commission', air 1964 sc 207 (a), b. k. mukherja j. delivering the judgment of the court said--'there are ..... harnam singh, j.1. in order to appreciate the point that arises for decision in letters patent appeal no. 34 of 1953 it is necessary to set out the facts of the case in some detail.2. by notification made on 30-8-1949, the chancellor of ..... . 2 of 1953.10. finding, as i do, that civil writ (application) no 2 of 1953 was not competent under article 226 of the constitution. i dismiss with costs letters patent appeal no. 34 of 1953.kapur, j.11. i agree. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 07 1961 (HC)

Dev Prakash Balmukand Vs. Babu Ram Rewti Mal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1961P& H429

dulat, j. 1. this is an appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent against a judgment of mahajan, j., setting aside the entire election to the municipal committee of nuh on a petition under article 226 of the constitution. the appellant is a .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //