Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: punjab and haryana Page 7 of about 10,205 results (0.023 seconds)

Mar 10 1976 (HC)

Kul Bhushan and ors. Vs. Faquira and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1976P& H341

..... in the hands of an heir who has got it by inheritance. on the findings of fact recorded in this case which have not been challenged before us it is patent that the plaintiffs were not big land-owners and the land which each one of them had acquired by inheritance was within the permissible ceiling and none of them had ..... of the new act.2. in this appeal under clause x of the letters patent against the said judgment of the learned judge in chambers it has been contended by mr. pitam singh jain that the jurisdiction of civil court is excluded by section 25 ..... judgment and decree of a learned single judge of this court, dated october 24, 1973. the decision of the learned single judge has led to the filing of this letters patent appeal by the unsuccessful plaintiffs. the learned judge has held that the suit was barred under section 25 of the act and was also barred by time under article 100 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 1970 (HC)

Virsa Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1970P& H525

..... dismissing the writ petition of the appellants on the abovesaid two grounds that the present appeal has been filed by the unsuccessful writ petitioners under clause 10 of the letters patent of this court.4-6. mr. baldev singh jawanda, learned advocate for the appellants, submitted that both the grounds on which the main contention of the appellants on the merits ..... argue the point at the outset. each case depends on its own facts in this respect. on the admitted facts of this case, we are unable to hold that a patently invalid order should be allowed to hold the field merely because a fatal defect therein was not pleaded by the appellants in the departmental proceedings.8. both the grounds on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 1982 (HC)

State of Haryana and ors. Vs. Asha Ram

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1983P& H57

..... the record the high court would be entitled to interfere under art. 226 of the constitution'. it is against this order of the learned single judge that the present letters patent appeal has been filed.5. the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the highest bid offered by the respondent was subject to approval of the settlement ..... aside the order of the settlement officer dated oct, 12, 1977 and that of the settlement commissioner dated nov. 30, 1977 cannot be sustained.9. in the result the letters patent appeal is accepted, the order of the learned single judge dated nov. 30, 1979. set aside and c. w. p. no. 3904 of 1979 is dismissed. there will be no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 1979 (HC)

The Kurukshetra University and ors. Vs. Rural College of Education, Ka ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1980P& H103

..... the statutory provisions of ordinance 1 framed under the kurukshetra university act, 1956, is the solitary; though meaningful, question which arises in this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent.2. though the issue aforesaid is manifestly legal, the matrix of facts giving rise to the same nevertheless call for some detailed notice. the rural college of education, kaithal, managed ..... the university's power to issue the guidelines. ultimately, the appellant-university served a showcause notice as to why it should not be disaffiliated as they had admitted students in patent violation of the guidelines issued by the university to which the respondent-college took the stand that the university had no power to issue the guidelines. ultimately, the executive council ..... the guidelines, annexure p/3 had been issued, the struck the same down as illegal and as e consequence also set aside the disaffiliation of the university.5. this letters patent appeal first came up before the division bench, who 1n their reference order had taken the view that the larger question regarding a university having the power to control end ..... either ultra vires of the act or otherwise unconstitutional we are unable to either appreciate, or to permit the raising of any such contention at the stage of a letters patent appeal. reference to the exhaustive writ petition would show that far from so alleging, there was not even a hint that ordinance-1 of the act was either ultra vires .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 20 1971 (HC)

Bhagwan Das and ors. Vs. the Financial Commissioner, Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1972P& H423

1. the main question arising in this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent against the order of a learned single judge, dated 20th of november, 1970, in civil writ 1354 of 1969, is whether a tenant is entitled to an order for purchase .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 1965 (HC)

Rajinder Parshad and anr. Vs. the Punjab State and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1966P& H185

..... single judge. it is quite clear from his. judgment that the appellants never mentioned that their writ petition involved any breach of fundamental rights. it is undisputed that the letters patent bench will not allow the appellant to raise any question of fact or law, which was not agitated before the learned single judge, whose judgment was under appeal. secondly, ..... less an arbitrary, standard to determine whether a petition should be thrown out in limine or considered on merits. the object, in such cases, is the removal of grave and patent errors which infringe on human rights and unless, by undue delay or laches, inconsistent, legal or equitable considerations have arisen which judicial conscience cannot with equanimity ignore, justice should not ..... have not been able to persuade myself to agree with his decision. it is for this reason that i am writing my separate judgment.19. the appellants in this letters patent appeal are the landlords and respondents their tenants. the landlords filed applications before the assistant collector, first grade, fazilka, district ferozepore, for the ejectment of their tenants under section ..... application which is nothing more than a step towards obtaining a final adjudication in the suit is not in my opinion, a judgment with in the meaning of the letters patent. * * * * * * * speaking generally i think the word 'judgment' means any 'final order, decree or judgment' within the meaning of those words as used in section 12 of the english judicature .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 1995 (HC)

Satish Nath Sharma Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1996ACJ521; (1996)112PLR159

..... to meet the ends of justice, we direct the state of haryana to pay a lumpsum of rs. 80,000/- as compensation to the claimants in letters patent appeal no. 687 of 1986. the learned tribunal has already awarded a sum of rs. 56,600/- as compensation which was affirmed by the learned single ..... accident claims tribunal. some of the claimants as well as the state of haryana, aggrieved by the impugned judgment of the learned single judge, have filed letters patent appeals, as mentioned above.6. mr. arun nehra, learned additional advocate general, haryana, appearing for the state of haryana, urged that the enhancement of compensation ..... the learned single judge on april 28, 1986, in f.a.os nos. 5 of 1983, 63 of 1983 and 64 of 1983.2. letters patent appeals nos. 818 and 819 of 1986 are filed by the state of haryana challenging the award of compensation in favour of satish nath sharma and usha ..... and 819 of 1986 are filed by the state of haryana praying for reduction of compensation granted to satish nath sharma and usha rani whereas two letters patent appeals nos. 686 and 687 of 1986 are filed by the claimants for enhancement of compensation.3. the learned single judge has very succinctly set ..... interest at the rate of 12 per cent per annum from the date of the application filed before the tribunal. in the result, letters patent appeal no. 687 of 1986 is allowed with costs. we hope the respondents in this appeal will pay the compensation expeditiously and preferably before 31st december, 1995. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 1999 (HC)

State of Punjab Vs. Ranjit Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2000)125PLR45

..... the single bench in terms of the order passed in som nath's case (supra). the state has challenged those orders by filing appeals under clause x of the letters patent.6. on july 18, 1986, a division bench condoned the delay in filing of the appeals but dismissed the same on merit. those orders were challenged by the state of ..... 151 to 153-a c.p.c. read with section 30 of the act. he pointed out that at least in seven cases, the state government did not file letters patent appeals and the land owners have been given the benefit of solatium and interest in terms of the order passed by the learned single judge but in the cases of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 02 1976 (HC)

Parkash Chand Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1977P& H26

prem chand jain, j. 1. parkash chand has filed this appeal under clause x of the letters patent against the judgment of a learned single judge; of this court. this appeal came up for hearing before my learned brother bains, j. and myself. after hearing the learned counsel .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 1969 (HC)

Ajit Singh Vs. Smt. Subaghan and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1970P& H93

..... single judge, abandonment is apparently a question of fact and a question like this cannot possibly be' raised in appeals of the present type under clause 10 of the letters patent. it has next been urged by the learned counsel that ajit singh appellant having, since the purchase of land by him, made improvementsin the land purchased, his claim compensation for ..... patent appeal no. 35 of 1966. 3. these appeals came for hearing before falshaw, c. j., and my learned brother mahajan, j., on march 24, 1966, when ..... is against the judgment and order of the learned judge that ajit singh appellant has come up in appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent and so also respondents 2 to 5 in his appeal. the appeal o ajit singh appellant is letters patent appeal no. 354 of 1965 and that of respondents 2 to 5 in that appeal is letters .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //