Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: punjab and haryana Page 7 of about 10,204 results (0.021 seconds)

Jan 22 1975 (HC)

Siri Ram Singh and ors. Vs. Kundan Lal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1975P& H374

1. this order will dispose of letters patent appeals nos. 258 and 332 of 1971. the facts giving rise to these appeals may first be surveyed. kundan lal respondent in both these appeals filed civil writ petition no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 1970 (HC)

Virsa Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1970P& H525

..... dismissing the writ petition of the appellants on the abovesaid two grounds that the present appeal has been filed by the unsuccessful writ petitioners under clause 10 of the letters patent of this court.4-6. mr. baldev singh jawanda, learned advocate for the appellants, submitted that both the grounds on which the main contention of the appellants on the merits ..... argue the point at the outset. each case depends on its own facts in this respect. on the admitted facts of this case, we are unable to hold that a patently invalid order should be allowed to hold the field merely because a fatal defect therein was not pleaded by the appellants in the departmental proceedings.8. both the grounds on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 1982 (HC)

State of Haryana and ors. Vs. Asha Ram

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1983P& H57

..... the record the high court would be entitled to interfere under art. 226 of the constitution'. it is against this order of the learned single judge that the present letters patent appeal has been filed.5. the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the highest bid offered by the respondent was subject to approval of the settlement ..... aside the order of the settlement officer dated oct, 12, 1977 and that of the settlement commissioner dated nov. 30, 1977 cannot be sustained.9. in the result the letters patent appeal is accepted, the order of the learned single judge dated nov. 30, 1979. set aside and c. w. p. no. 3904 of 1979 is dismissed. there will be no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 1979 (HC)

The Kurukshetra University and ors. Vs. Rural College of Education, Ka ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1980P& H103

..... the statutory provisions of ordinance 1 framed under the kurukshetra university act, 1956, is the solitary; though meaningful, question which arises in this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent.2. though the issue aforesaid is manifestly legal, the matrix of facts giving rise to the same nevertheless call for some detailed notice. the rural college of education, kaithal, managed ..... the university's power to issue the guidelines. ultimately, the appellant-university served a showcause notice as to why it should not be disaffiliated as they had admitted students in patent violation of the guidelines issued by the university to which the respondent-college took the stand that the university had no power to issue the guidelines. ultimately, the executive council ..... the guidelines, annexure p/3 had been issued, the struck the same down as illegal and as e consequence also set aside the disaffiliation of the university.5. this letters patent appeal first came up before the division bench, who 1n their reference order had taken the view that the larger question regarding a university having the power to control end ..... either ultra vires of the act or otherwise unconstitutional we are unable to either appreciate, or to permit the raising of any such contention at the stage of a letters patent appeal. reference to the exhaustive writ petition would show that far from so alleging, there was not even a hint that ordinance-1 of the act was either ultra vires .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 20 1971 (HC)

Bhagwan Das and ors. Vs. the Financial Commissioner, Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1972P& H423

1. the main question arising in this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent against the order of a learned single judge, dated 20th of november, 1970, in civil writ 1354 of 1969, is whether a tenant is entitled to an order for purchase .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 1965 (HC)

Rajinder Parshad and anr. Vs. the Punjab State and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1966P& H185

..... single judge. it is quite clear from his. judgment that the appellants never mentioned that their writ petition involved any breach of fundamental rights. it is undisputed that the letters patent bench will not allow the appellant to raise any question of fact or law, which was not agitated before the learned single judge, whose judgment was under appeal. secondly, ..... less an arbitrary, standard to determine whether a petition should be thrown out in limine or considered on merits. the object, in such cases, is the removal of grave and patent errors which infringe on human rights and unless, by undue delay or laches, inconsistent, legal or equitable considerations have arisen which judicial conscience cannot with equanimity ignore, justice should not ..... have not been able to persuade myself to agree with his decision. it is for this reason that i am writing my separate judgment.19. the appellants in this letters patent appeal are the landlords and respondents their tenants. the landlords filed applications before the assistant collector, first grade, fazilka, district ferozepore, for the ejectment of their tenants under section ..... application which is nothing more than a step towards obtaining a final adjudication in the suit is not in my opinion, a judgment with in the meaning of the letters patent. * * * * * * * speaking generally i think the word 'judgment' means any 'final order, decree or judgment' within the meaning of those words as used in section 12 of the english judicature .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 1995 (HC)

Satish Nath Sharma Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1996ACJ521; (1996)112PLR159

..... to meet the ends of justice, we direct the state of haryana to pay a lumpsum of rs. 80,000/- as compensation to the claimants in letters patent appeal no. 687 of 1986. the learned tribunal has already awarded a sum of rs. 56,600/- as compensation which was affirmed by the learned single ..... accident claims tribunal. some of the claimants as well as the state of haryana, aggrieved by the impugned judgment of the learned single judge, have filed letters patent appeals, as mentioned above.6. mr. arun nehra, learned additional advocate general, haryana, appearing for the state of haryana, urged that the enhancement of compensation ..... the learned single judge on april 28, 1986, in f.a.os nos. 5 of 1983, 63 of 1983 and 64 of 1983.2. letters patent appeals nos. 818 and 819 of 1986 are filed by the state of haryana challenging the award of compensation in favour of satish nath sharma and usha ..... and 819 of 1986 are filed by the state of haryana praying for reduction of compensation granted to satish nath sharma and usha rani whereas two letters patent appeals nos. 686 and 687 of 1986 are filed by the claimants for enhancement of compensation.3. the learned single judge has very succinctly set ..... interest at the rate of 12 per cent per annum from the date of the application filed before the tribunal. in the result, letters patent appeal no. 687 of 1986 is allowed with costs. we hope the respondents in this appeal will pay the compensation expeditiously and preferably before 31st december, 1995. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 02 1976 (HC)

Parkash Chand Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1977P& H26

prem chand jain, j. 1. parkash chand has filed this appeal under clause x of the letters patent against the judgment of a learned single judge; of this court. this appeal came up for hearing before my learned brother bains, j. and myself. after hearing the learned counsel .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 1969 (HC)

Ajit Singh Vs. Smt. Subaghan and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1970P& H93

..... single judge, abandonment is apparently a question of fact and a question like this cannot possibly be' raised in appeals of the present type under clause 10 of the letters patent. it has next been urged by the learned counsel that ajit singh appellant having, since the purchase of land by him, made improvementsin the land purchased, his claim compensation for ..... patent appeal no. 35 of 1966. 3. these appeals came for hearing before falshaw, c. j., and my learned brother mahajan, j., on march 24, 1966, when ..... is against the judgment and order of the learned judge that ajit singh appellant has come up in appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent and so also respondents 2 to 5 in his appeal. the appeal o ajit singh appellant is letters patent appeal no. 354 of 1965 and that of respondents 2 to 5 in that appeal is letters .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 04 1963 (HC)

Bhikhan Bobla and ors. Vs. the Punjab State and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1963P& H255

..... accomplished under the act. as to when this purpose cart be deemed to be finally accomplished under the act is again a question which does not seem to be quite patent.i, however, think that the expression 'at any time' used in section 36 calls for a construction in harmony with the purpose or subject-matter of the whole act guided ..... committee to act judicially and it was not obliged to give an opportunity to every examinee to be heard. the petition was rejected.when the matter came up in letters patent appeal before two learned judges of that court, there was a disagreement between them on certain matters and, therefore, a reference to the third learned judge was called for. the ..... to article 31a, and on this ground section 36 is not liable to be impugned as ultra vires the constitution.37. the next main question is whether these four letters patent appeals deserve to succeed on the ground that the wider principles of natural justice had been transgressed.38. the two well-known principles embodied in the rules of natural justice ..... tek chand, j.1. these are four letters patent appeals nos. 177, 175, 167 and 178 of 1961, which may be conveniently disposed of by one judgment as they involve a point common to all cases which has been .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //