Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: punjab and haryana Page 9 of about 10,204 results (0.041 seconds)

Dec 04 1958 (HC)

Kartar Singh Hira Singh and anr. Vs. Haripal Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1960P& H29

..... necessary for the appellant to obtain a certificate of fitness and he would have been at liberty to present an appeal to this court under clause 10 of the letters patent without any such certificate.two authorities of supreme court, namely nathoo lal v. durga prasad, air 1954 sc 355 and indira sohanlal v. custodian of evacuee property, delhi, (s) air ..... not competent as the learned judge by whom the order under appeal was passed had declined to certify that the case is a fit one for appeal to the letters patent bench.(4) section 63 of the states reorganisation act is in the following terms :63(1) all proceedings pending in the high court of patiala and east punjab states union ..... state of pepsu was integrated with the state of the punjab on 1-11-1956 and the appellants preferred an appeal to this court under clause 10 of the letters patent against the order of the learned chief justice of the pepsu high court. this appeal is now before us for consideration.(3) mr. nehra who appears for the respondents raises ..... a.n. bhandari, c.j. (1) this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent raises the question whether a right of appeal which has been destroyed under the patiala and east punjab states union judicature ordinance, 2005 bk., has been revived by s. 63 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 1982 (HC)

The Chandigarh Administration and ors. Vs. Surjit Kesar

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1983P& H142

..... rules framed thereunder, is essentially transient and migratory in nature--comes to be the spinal issue in these two connected appeals under clause x of the letters patent preferred by the chandigarh administration.2. the issues of fact and law being admittedly common, the factual matrix may be picked from l. p. a ..... three years licence on the one hand and a temporary licence on the other. by virtue of sub-rule (ii) a three years licence is patently renewable and not only that it seems to be (without conclusively pronouncing thereupon) mandatory so on the application of the licensee provided, of course, the ..... further extension, the necessity of recording of reasons to do so and the method of calculating the aggregate period are all sharp pointers to the patent intent of the statue that such a licence is essentially transient and temporary in its nature.12. the aforesaid stand is further buttressed when reference ..... of temporary licence as also the period for its extension and further are counted in prohibitory terms. on this basic promise, it is patent that the reasons clearly and categorically given by the home secretary for affirming the refusal if extension by the licensing authority are both germane to ..... the issue and are patently valid. it was found as a fact that the temporary licence for the raj talkies had already continued to be extended from time to .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 08 1968 (HC)

Chanan Dass Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1968P& H529

..... only a question of law and then remits the case to the learned single judge for deciding the other points arising in the case, the letters patent bench, in an appeal against the final decision given by the learned single judge, cannot examine the correctness of the view of the earlier division ..... of the division bench, dated february 19, 1964, will operate as res judicata inter partes, and cannot be allowed to be challenged in this letters patent appeal from the final judgment of the learned single judge, to whom the case was sent back expressly for deciding the writ petition only on the other ..... a question of law and then remits the case to the learned single judge for deciding the other points arising in the case, the letters patent bench in an appeal against the final decision given by the learned single judge cannot examine the correctness of the view of the earlier division bench ..... c. w. 1492 of 1961) was also heard, operated as res judicata between the parties and the correctness thereof could not be questioned in the letters patent appeal against the judgment of khanna, j. dated 24-3-1964 whereby he had dismissed the appellant's writ petition in view of that decision. the ..... and the same could not be re-agitated before and reversed by the full bench. the difficulty, however, arose, because in the present case, the letters patent bench consisting of mehar singh, c. j. and mahajan, j. as already mentioned above, allowed the law point, decided by the earlier division bench consisting .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 1972 (HC)

Tulsa Singh Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1973P& H263

..... writ no. 1911 of 1971 challenging the acquisition proceedings, which was dismissed by the learned single judge and he has come up in appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent.2. before us the main point urged was that the notification under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the act), is not in accordance ..... 1. the facts giving rise to this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent are as follows:in the year 1958 notification no. 8277/w1 was published in the official gazette for the acquisition of land described therein for a public purpose, namely, ' for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 1962 (HC)

State of Punjab and ors. Vs. Raghunath Dass

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1963P& H76

tek chand, j. 1. this judgment will dispose of three letters.. patent appeals nos. 125, 126 and 127 of 1962, preferred from the judgment of d. k. mahajan judge, as all these appeals give rise to similar questions of fact and law. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 1967 (HC)

The State of Punjab and anr. Vs. Sewak Hotel

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1968]21STC276(P& H)

..... ] 14 s.t.c. 524. two questions were raised before me; and after deciding the first question, i allowed the petition. the matter was taken to the letters patent bench ; and the letters patent bench took a different view on the first question and has reversed my decision.- as the second question was not decided, the case has been sent back to ..... s.b. capoor, j. 1. this letters patent appeal is by the state of punjab and the assessing authority, excise and taxation officer, bhatinda, and is directed against the order of the learned single judge, dated the 15th .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 1977 (HC)

The State of Haryana Vs. Bharat Timber Store and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1977P& H312

gurnam singh, j.1. this letters patent appeal is directed against the judgment of rajendra nath mittal, j., vide which the appeal filed by the appellant has been dismissed.2. the facts of the case, briefly stated, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 1968 (HC)

Joginer Singh Vs. Pushpa

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1969P& H397

..... proceedings on the ground that it had not been complied with within a period of two years from the date on which it was passed. the letters patent appeal in that case would have to be dismissed because the husband would not be able to get a decree of divorce on its strength.47. ..... a decree for restitution of conjugal rights could be granted by consent appeared to be wrong as it was not warranted by law. seventhly, when the letters patent appeal was heard by the division bench and the questions of law had been referred to the full bench interfering order of the learned chief justice, it ..... decree for restitution of conjugal rights was granted to joginder singh. this statement was also not challenged by the husband in the ground s of his letters patent appeal. on the other hand, his position in ground no.9 of the appeal was that the view of the learned single judge that there was ..... sc 199 the question was whether the decree of the bombay high court after leave to file suit had been obtained under clause 12 of the letters patent, was without jurisdiction? the objection in execution before the allahabad high court when the decree was sought to be executed was that the bombay high court had ..... decree of the trial court and dismissed the petition of the appellant on april 15, 1964.6. the appellant's appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent from the decree of the learned single judge first came for hearing before a my learned brother, pandit j., and myself. during the hearing of the appeal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 1975 (HC)

Triloki Nath Bhargava and anr. Vs. Smt. Jaswant Kaur and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1975P& H303

..... learned single judge. in these circumstances the appellants have no right to urge this new and absolutely fresh ground of attack in an appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent without obtaining leave of the bench hearing the appeal. after carefully considering all the circumstances of the case we decline to grant such leave. even otherwise we are of the ..... amount of the award in her favour to rs. 12,000/-. the driver-owner of the car and its insurer have preferred this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent against the judgment of the learned single judge in the cross-objections. the first respondent has not preferred any further appeal in the matter of the quantum of damages. 3 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 1989 (HC)

Mohinder Kumar Aggarwal Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1990P& H250; (1990)97PLR553

..... the municipal committee forthwith. the learned single judge allowed the writ petition and quashed the impugned order dated 20th june, 1988 (ann. p/2).3. before us in the letters patent appeal filed by mohinder kumar aggarwal, president, municipal committee, kapurthala, it has been vehemently urged by mr. g. c.dhuriwala, learned counsel for the appellant that the elected members are ..... . we are afraid, the principles enunciated in the aforesaid authorities, though very salutory, cannot take the place of statutory provisions which are mandatory in their application.9. consequently, the letters patent appeal is dismissed being devoid of force. there shall be no order as to costs.10. appeal dismissed.

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //