Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1948 Page 1 of about 100 results (0.019 seconds)

May 03 1948 (PC)

Bashir Ahmad Vs. the Crown

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-03-1948

Reported in : 1951CriLJ1041

..... the past or in the future. if article 37 is interpreted in the manner suggested by mr. sawhney, & it is held that the letters patent were intended to contain an exhaustive statement of the powers of the h. c. of lahore unless subsequently extended by any act of the indian ..... article 37 was acts of the indian legislature affecting the powers & jurisdiction of the h. cs., to be passed after the publication of the letters patent. according to him, all provisions relating to the powers & the jurisdiction of h. cs., contained in enactments that were in force at the time ..... because such an application was made in a criminal proceeding or matter & from an order passed by him, on a liberal construction of the letters patent, an appeal would lie. when dealing with the argument that the division bench hearing the so-called reference under section 307 was exercising original criminal ..... the learned judges held that the ct. in both cases would be 'acting as a ct. of reference within the meaning of clause 21, letters patent.10. in meeting the argument, raised by the judges themselves, that the proceedings mentioned in article 13 were on a grammatical consideration of the language ..... exercise any kind of jurisdiction or deal with any class of case which could not be brought within the four corners of the language employed in the letters patent. so far as criminal jurisdiction was concerned they said that it fell within five distinct categories: (i) ordinary original criminal jurisdiction (cls. 15 & 16 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 24 1948 (PC)

Banwari Lal Ram Deo Vs. the Board of Trustees

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-24-1948

Reported in : AIR1949P& H165

..... be very rarely, if ever, that this court will take cognizance of proceedings under the arbitration act in the exercise of its extraordinary original civil jurisdiction. even without bringing letters patent appeals within the purview of section 39(i), it may be possible to uphold the decisions of the calcutta and the bombay high courts--on the ground that orders other ..... for regarding the arbitration act as more exhaustive than the civil procedure code or any other code.22. it is quite true that, as pointed out in the madras judgment, the letters patent having expressly been made subject to the legislative powers of the indian legislature, there was nothing to prevent that legislature from taking away, in any particular case, the right of ..... -consideration. in that case although the bench gave no final decision on the subject, and dismissed the appeal on the merits, khosla, j. who wrote the judgment of the letters patent bench, while discussing the preliminary objection raised on the respondent's behalf to the competency of the appeal, expressed an inclination to agree with the madras view in preference to ..... to decide inasmuch as, even, if the particular reference was invalid, that could not affect the validity or the operation of the arbitration agreement. defendant 1 has filed a letters patent appeal from the judgment of the learned single judge.17. mr. bishen narain, the learned counsel for the respondents, raised a preliminary objection to the competency of the appeal, relying .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 1948 (PC)

Manohar Lal Vs. Mt. Durgi and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-05-1948

Reported in : AIR1949P& H124

teja singh, j.1. this is a letters patent appeal from a judgment of the learned single judge of the lahore high court. the facts briefly stated are as follows: one amar chand died about 25 years ago, leaving .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 1948 (PC)

Ramji Lal S/O Mahadeo Parshad Vs. Rex

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jun-26-1948

Reported in : 1949CriLJ271

..... it has been clearly excluded by reason of the phraseology of section 491 read with section 108, government of india act, 1915, and clause 20, letters patent. i therefore repel the contention of mr, sethi that an application under section 491, criminal p. c, can be taken from judge to judge till ..... the single benches or division benches constituted under the provisions of section 108, government of india act, 1915. clause 35, letters patent, also empowers the high court from time to time to make rules for delegating to any .registrar, prothonotary or master or other official of the court ..... deprive any judge of the jurisdiction which he is authorized to exercise by virtue of the provisions of section 108 read with clause 26, letters patent. the rules framed under section 106 are merely rules of practice for regulating the work of the court; they do not affect the jurisdiction of ..... its criminal appellate jurisdiction.14. how the court has to function in the exercise of its powers has been laid down in clause 26, letters patent in these terms:and we do hereby declare that any function which is hereby directed to be performed by the high court of judicature at lahore, ..... the court, and power to make rules for regulating the practice of the courts as are vetted in them by letters patent, and, subject to the provisions of any such letters patent, all such jurisdiction, powers and authority as are vested in those courts respectively at the commencement of this act.it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 26 1948 (PC)

In Re: Indian Companies Act of 1913 and of the New Bank of India Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-26-1948

Reported in : AIR1949P& H373

..... that rajam ayyar was entitled to payment in full of the amount of his claim, holding that the company held the said amount in a fiduciary capacity. on a letters patent appeal, the matter came up before a bench of three judges namely, mitter, munro and abdul rahim, jj. they up. held the decision of the learned judge in chambers.14 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 1948 (PC)

Ram Sarup Vs. Ram Chandar

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jun-16-1948

Reported in : AIR1949P& H29

..... plaintiff preferred a second appeal to the high court, lahore. it may here be mentioned that after ram chandar's suit for declaration had been eventually dismissed by the letters patent bench of the lahore high court, he instituted a suit in the revenue court on 4th october 1943 for cancellation of the sale of occupancy rights by the official receiver ..... decreed by the trial court and the decree was upheld by the lower appellate court as well as by the high court.3. but on further appeal to a letters patent bench of the lahore high court the decree of the trial court was set aside and ram chandar's suit was dismissed on the ground that the sale of occupancy ..... teja singh, j.1. this is a letters patent appeal from a decision of a learned single judge of the high court, lahore. the facts shortly stated are as follows: one prabhu dial was the landlord of khasra no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 1948 (PC)

Ramji Lal S/O Mahadeo Parsad Vs. Rex

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-26-1948

Reported in : AIR1949P& H67

..... it has been clearly excluded by reason of the phraseology of section 491 read with section 108, government of india act, 1915, and clause 26, letters patent. i therefore repel the contention of mr. sethi that an application under section 491, criminal p.c., can be taken from judge to judge till ..... the single benches ok division benches constituted under the provisions of section 108, government of india act, 1915. clause 35, letters patent, also empowers the high court from time to time to make rules foe delegating to any registrar, prothonotary of master or other official of the court ..... deprive any judge of the jurisdiction which he is authorized to exercise' by virtue of the provisions of section 108 read with clause 26, letters patent. the rules framed under section 106 are merely rules of practice tot regulating the work of the court; they do not affect the jurisdiction of ..... its criminal appellate jurisdiction.15. how the court has to function in the exercise of its powers has been laid down in clause 26. letters patent in these terms:and we do hereby declare that any function which is hereby directed to be performed by the high court of judicature at lahore, ..... court, and power to make rules for regulating i he practice of the courts as are vetted in them by letters patent, and, subject to the provisions of any such letters patent, all such jurisdiction, powers and authority as are vested in those courts respectively at the commencement of this act.it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 22 1948 (PC)

Harbans Singh Vs. Karam Chand and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-22-1948

Reported in : AIR1949P& H299

..... 1941 lah. 257, a full bench of the lahore high court held that the statutory rules framed by the high court under clause 27 of the letters patent under the authority delegated to it by his majesty who, in turn, was acting under the powers conferred on him by act of parliament are a ' ..... the period for the presentation of the present appeal could be extended neither by the learned single judge who granted the leave to file the present letters patent appeal, nor by the bench which has been called upon to hear the appeal, it could be extended by the admitting bench and the admitting bench ..... , of the rules and orders of the high court, which is in the following terms:no memorandum of appeal preferred under clause 10, of the letters patent shall be entertained if presented after the expiration of 30 days from the date of the judgment appealed from, unless the admitting bench in its discretion, for ..... court on 18th february i.e., two days after the period of limitation had expired. it was accompanied by an application for permission to file a letters patent appeal. on 1st april 1948, the appellant filed an' application under section 5, limitation act in which it was prayed that the two days',_ ..... is barred by time. the order of the learned single judge was passed on 4th december 1947, and an appeal under clause 10, of the letters patent could have been filed on 16th february 1948, when the high court reopened on the conclusion of the winter vacation. the memorandum of appeal was actually .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 1948 (PC)

Proprietors of Mauza Silauthi and ors. Vs. Raj Rup and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-30-1948

Reported in : AIR1949P& H325

..... the view taken by the courts below and dismissed the suit. the defendants are dissatisfied with the order and have come to this court under para. 10 of the letters patent.2. sub-section (1) of section 59, punjab tenancy act, declares that when a tenant having right of occupancy dies, the right shall in the circumstances set out in the ..... allowed the plea to be examined by the courts below and by the learned single judge. in the grounds of appeal which were filed under para 10, of the letters patent no allegation was made that the defendants had set up a new case. it is not within the competence of this bench to entertain an objection about a new case .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 11 1948 (PC)

Mt. Harnam Kaur Vs. Ratna and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-11-1948

Reported in : AIR1949P& H267

teja singh, j.1. these are two connected appeals under clause 10, letters patent, from a judgment of a learned single judge of the lahore high court.2. the facts relevant for purposes of the appeal may be shortly stated. karam singh and dipa .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //