Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1964 Page 1 of about 134 results (0.037 seconds)

May 25 1964 (HC)

Municipal Corporation, Delhi Vs. Jai Dayal Jawanda Mal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-25-1964

Reported in : 1964CriLJ723

..... circumstances to sentence the accused to imprisonment, with the result that, in my opinion, a sentence of fine of rs. 100/- would serve the ends of justice; in default of patents of fine, the accused will have to undergo simple imprisonment for one month. the fine would be paid within two weeks from today.15. before finally closing the judgment, a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 1964 (HC)

Ramesh Kapur Vs. Punjab University and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-31-1964

Reported in : AIR1965P& H120

..... 1962 dated 20-3-1963 (punj) which i do not propose to discuss as the matter is stated to be the subject to be the subject-matter of a letters patent appeal.(15) thus, most of the cases, which have come up before single and division benches of this court, have been decided on their own facts and in each case ..... grover, j. (1) the bench hearing the appear under clause 10 of the letters patent against a judgment of a learned single judge dismissing a petition under article 226 of the constitution of ramesh kapur (hereinafter to be called the candidate) challenging the order of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 1964 (HC)

National Rayon Corporation Ltd., Bombay Vs. the Additional Assistant E ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-16-1964

Reported in : AIR1965P& H62; [1964]15STC746(P& H)

dulat, j. (1) these three appeals under clause 10 of the letters patent (letters patent appeals nos. 263, 264 and 265 of 1963 ). arise out of a single judgment of shamsher bahadur, j., by which he dismissed three writ petitions brought on behalf of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 05 1964 (HC)

The State of Punjab and ors. Vs. Banta Singh Arjan and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-05-1964

Reported in : AIR1966P& H32

..... was obviously a common purpose. the scheme was accordingly quashed to the extent indicated before. the present appeal has been filed by the state under clause 10 of the letters patent.4. there can be no manner of doubt that in view of our decision in jit singh v. state of punjab (letters ..... patent appeal no. 131 of 1960): (air 1964 punj 419 fb), the only reservation which could not have been validly and properly made relates to the area of 75 kanals and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 26 1964 (HC)

Dharam Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-26-1964

Reported in : AIR1966P& H468

..... appellant had been punished or that the action against him was mala fide. in the result, the writ petition was dismissed. hence this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent.2. mr. abnasha singh points out that although the learned single judge accepted the suggestion that the appellant had become a probationer with effect from the 1st october 1957 in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 1964 (HC)

Munsha Singh Sunder Singh and ors. Vs. Gurudit Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-29-1964

Reported in : AIR1965P& H80

..... nos. 23 of 1960, 24 of 1960 and 25 of 1960), which are interconnected filed under clause 10 of the letters patent are directed against a judgment of a learned single judge who has decreed the suits of the plaintiffs to the extent indicated in his judgment in reversal of the decree .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 02 1964 (HC)

Bibi Amar Kaur Vs. Shiv Karan and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-02-1964

Reported in : AIR1965P& H206

..... o. 21, r. 58 read with r. 63 of the code of civil procedure. the second appeal, in the circumstances, was dismissed. (6) i may state that when this letters patent appeal first came up for hearing before mehar singh and grover, jj. they found that certain facts were not clear and that it was necessary to have complete history of ..... (1) this letters patent appeal filed by bibi amar kaur is directed against the judgment and decree of learned single judge whereby he dismissed regular second appeal filed by the appellant against the judgment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 1964 (HC)

Manoharlal Ratna Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-21-1964

Reported in : AIR1965P& H328

..... decision of grover j. in jaswant singh's case civil writ no. 1076 of 1953, c/- 18-5-1959(punj) was unsuccessfully assailed on letters patent appeal in jaswant singh v. regional settlement commr. letters patent appeal no, 168 of 1959(punj) and the bench took the view that rule 26 does not confer any right on the claimant and it is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 1964 (HC)

Smt. Gurdial Kaur and anr. Vs. Pritam Singh Kehar Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-11-1964

Reported in : AIR1966P& H212

..... of the khewats and khataunis are quite clearly specified it has also been explained that since at no stage prior to the final determination of the controversy by the letters patent bench did any cause of action for executing the decree for possession arise, this mistake remained unnoticed till an objection was raised by the judgment-debtor and upheld by the ..... of these two parcels of land was described to be 104 bighas and 10 biswas instead of 119 bighas and 18 biswas this mistake continued unnoticed right up to fetters patent appeal in this court and it was only when the final decree of this court was sought to be executed that this mistake in calculation came to light while suing ..... application by the plaintiff respondents whose suit for possession of land was decreed by the trial court and the appeals against which had been dismissed right up to the letters patent appeal which was decided by this bench on 27th of march 1962 in this application, it has been stated that the plaintiffs in the suit in the trial court had .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 08 1964 (HC)

Union of India and anr. Vs. Basakha Singh and Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-08-1964

Reported in : AIR1965P& H181

..... . firstly, this point again was not argued before the learned single judge and, therefore, the same cannot be permitted to be taken up for the first time in the letters patent appeal. secondly, this averment of the respondent in para 5 of the writ petition was denied by the appellants in their return, where it was clearly stated by them that ..... in the same. in the first place, this point was not argued before the learned single judge and cannot, therefore, be taken up for the first time in the letter patent appeal. secondly, if a doubt had, in fact, arisen in his mind and that collector had, therefore, sought clarification from the department concerned, there is no harm in doing so ..... portion of the military forces of a state in india being a unit notified in pursuance of the first schedule to the indian extradition act, 1903. (e) morris tubes and patent ammunition imported by officers commanding india regiments or volunteer corps for the instruction of their men. 316 ornamental arms of an obsolete pattern possessing only and antiquarian value; masonic and ..... result the order confiscating the goods imported by the respondent company passed by the customs authorities was quashed. against this decision the present appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent has been filed by the union of india and the collector of central excise and land customs, new delhi.(4) learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the learned single .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //