Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1972 Page 1 of about 183 results (0.028 seconds)

Sep 20 1972 (HC)

Tulsa Singh Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-20-1972

Reported in : AIR1973P& H263

..... writ no. 1911 of 1971 challenging the acquisition proceedings, which was dismissed by the learned single judge and he has come up in appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent.2. before us the main point urged was that the notification under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the act), is not in accordance ..... 1. the facts giving rise to this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent are as follows:in the year 1958 notification no. 8277/w1 was published in the official gazette for the acquisition of land described therein for a public purpose, namely, ' for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 18 1972 (HC)

Dev Raj Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-18-1972

Reported in : AIR1974P& H65

..... the forms or manners specified in section 8 and the rules made under the act.75. support for this contention is sought from the decision of the letters patent bench in meal ram's case. l.p.a. 92 of 1963(supra) where dua j. noticing the provisions of section 8 of the act, ..... the bench consisting of i.d. dua and h.r. khanna, jj. (now their lordships of the supreme court) dealt with a bunch of letters patent appeals and writ petitions that had been referred to them to resolve the conflict in judicial decisions regarding the applicability of the amended rule 30 to proceedings pending before ..... accordance with the rules, as they existed on the date of his making the application. in view of the importance of the question raised, the letters patent bench directed that the controversy with regard to the effect of abrogation of rule 30 be settled authoritatively by a full bench. the full bench constituted by ..... disposing of the matter in accordance with law as it stood at that time and not when the case was remanded to him.'20. when the letters patent appeal came up before my lord the chief justice and myself, reliance for upholding the view taken by the learned single judge was placed on the ..... of rule 30 the evacuee property in dispute could not be transferred to the appellant. being still dissatisfied dev raj appealed under clause 10 of the letters patent against this order dated 10th of february, 1969. the finding of the learned single judge that the rules as they existed on the date of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 1972 (HC)

State of Punjab and ors. Vs. Sarmukh Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-03-1972

Reported in : AIR1972P& H463

..... petition under article 226 for impleading him as a party to 'a's writ petition and re-hearing the whole matter, khosla, j. allowed this petition. on appeal, the letters patent bench also affirmed this order. the supreme court on further appeal held that there was nothing in article 226 to preclude a high court from exercising the powers of review ..... director passed on the 9th october, 1962, were quashed. against that order dated october 31, 1968, of the learned single judge, these two appeals under clause 10 of the letters patent have been jointly filed by the state of punjab and the consolidation authorities concerned.5. the main ground on which the judgment of the learned single judge proceeds is, that ..... 1. common questions of law and fact arise in letters patent appeals nos. 179 and 286 of 1969. they will, therefore, be conveniently disposed of by the common judgment.2. the land in question is out of killa nos. 16 and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 1972 (HC)

Puran Singh Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-28-1972

Reported in : AIR1973P& H131

..... , ilr (1967)2 punj and har 89, and refused to go into the merits of the case. puran singh has filed the present appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent against the judgment of the learned single judge. 2. this appeal was earlier heard by us and accepted on october 19, 1970, on the ground that rule 18 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 1972 (HC)

The Amritsar Central Co-operative Store Ltd. Vs. Ram Kishan Mehra and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-10-1972

Reported in : AIR1973P& H342

..... certain reliefs were granted to them by the learned single judge. both the writ petitions were disposed of by one judgment and that is the reason why these two letters patent appeals are being disposed of by one judgment. the facts pleaded in both the cases are the same.2. on april 26, 1963. shri p. n. bhalla, district magistrate, amritsar ..... filed in this court which were decided by the learned single judge by order dated january 31, 1972. the present appeals have been filed under clause 10 of the letters patent by the amritsar central co-operative consumers store limited amritsar.4. it is not necessary to discuss all the points involved in the case as all of them have not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 1972 (HC)

Kartar Singh Vs. Lal Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-07-1972

Reported in : AIR1972P& H385

1. these three letters patent appeals (l. p. as 157 and 187 of 1970, and l. p. a. 582 of 1971) arise out of the decision of two different writ petitions by a learned single .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 1972 (HC)

inspector General of Police, Punjab and ors. Vs. Amrik Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-24-1972

Reported in : AIR1973P& H314

1. this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent is directed against the judgment of the learned single judge allowing the writ petition of amrik singh (c.w. no. 80 of 1969) by order dated july 20, 1971.2. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 1972 (HC)

Gurdial Singh and ors. Vs. Sewa Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-30-1972

Reported in : AIR1974P& H18

..... . a. 1293 of 1967 was filed in this court which was dismissed by the learned single judge on september 13, 1971. the present appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent has been filed against the judgment and decree of the learned single judge with his leave.2. the point requiring determination is whether the sale in favour of the defendant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 1972 (HC)

Chet Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-26-1972

Reported in : AIR1973P& H55

..... . a writ petition was filed in this court for quashing the orders of the revenue authorities which was dismissed by the learned single judge on march 2, 1967. a letters patent appeal has been filed against this judgment of the learned single judge.4. it may be mentioned at this stage that during the pendency of this appeal, chet singh who ..... 1. this letters patent appeal arises out of the judgment of the learned single judge dated march 2, 1967. from which a writ petition under article 226 of the constitution has been dismissed which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 04 1972 (HC)

Ram Lubhaya Kapur and ors. Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-04-1972

Reported in : AIR1973P& H297

b.r. tuli, j.1. this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent is directed against the judgment of a learned single judge dated november 25, 1970, dismissing the appellants' civil writ no. 2721 of 1970.2. appellant no. 1 is the sole .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //