Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1979 Page 1 of about 68 results (0.016 seconds)

Jul 16 1979 (HC)

Rajinder Singh Etc. Vs. Kultar Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-16-1979

Reported in : AIR1980P& H1

..... impugned acts having taken away the first appellate jurisdiction of the high court completely, which had been conferred an the high court under its letters patent, were unconstitutional.i am afraid, i am unable to agree with this contention of the learned counsel the contention of the learned counsel is ..... subscribe to the view propounded by the learned counsel that sections 39 and 41 of the punjab courts' act stood incorporated in the letters patent, moreover, if the state legislature had the legislative competency to make amendments in the punjab courts act, then the question of repugnancy of the ..... court of judicature at lahore was constituted and established by a charter issued by king george v on 2lst march, 1919, called the letters patent. it conferred first appellate jurisdiction in civil cases from the judgment and decrees passed by the civil courts in the provinces of punjab and delhi ..... the u. p. consolidation of holdings act, 1953 were abolished. the amending ordinance was replaced by the uttar pradesh high court (abolition of letters patent appeals)(amendment) act, 1972 incorporating similar section 4 which came into effect on 16-8-1972. the amendment bill was introduced in the uttar pradesh ..... the writ petition, did not find any merit in the contention and rejected the same.33. the appeal under clause x of the letters patent filed by the appellant also failed. the appellant thereafter filed an appeal by special leave before the supreme court where the question which fell for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 1979 (HC)

Government of Haryana and ors. Vs. Hakam Singh and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-15-1979

Reported in : AIR1979P& H122

..... . 4 and, 6. two appeals have been filed against the said order, one by the state government etc. respondents nos. 1, 2 & 3 (letters patent appeal no. 345 of 1974) and the other by, the company (letters patent appeal no. 387 of 1974). the other three petitions were filed by some other landowners on the same grounds. those writ petitions were also ..... nos. 342 to 345 and 386 to 389 of 1974 which involve similar question of law. the facts in the judgment are being given from letters patent appeal no. 345 of 1974.2. hukam singh respondent no. 1 is the owner and in possession of land measuring about 57 bighas situated within the revenue estate of village .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 1979 (HC)

The Kurukshetra University and ors. Vs. Rural College of Education, Ka ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-22-1979

Reported in : AIR1980P& H103

..... the statutory provisions of ordinance 1 framed under the kurukshetra university act, 1956, is the solitary; though meaningful, question which arises in this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent.2. though the issue aforesaid is manifestly legal, the matrix of facts giving rise to the same nevertheless call for some detailed notice. the rural college of education, kaithal, managed ..... the university's power to issue the guidelines. ultimately, the appellant-university served a showcause notice as to why it should not be disaffiliated as they had admitted students in patent violation of the guidelines issued by the university to which the respondent-college took the stand that the university had no power to issue the guidelines. ultimately, the executive council ..... the guidelines, annexure p/3 had been issued, the struck the same down as illegal and as e consequence also set aside the disaffiliation of the university.5. this letters patent appeal first came up before the division bench, who 1n their reference order had taken the view that the larger question regarding a university having the power to control end ..... either ultra vires of the act or otherwise unconstitutional we are unable to either appreciate, or to permit the raising of any such contention at the stage of a letters patent appeal. reference to the exhaustive writ petition would show that far from so alleging, there was not even a hint that ordinance-1 of the act was either ultra vires .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 1979 (HC)

State of Punjab Vs. Ajit Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-12-1979

Reported in : AIR1979P& H179

..... 34 as well. the ancillary argument on behalf of the respondents, therefore, merits only rejection.20. in the light of the aforesaid discussion i am constrained to allow this letters patent appeal and modify the judgment of the learned single judge to the effect that the arbitrator was entitled to award future interest. to this limited extent, the grant of interest ..... judgment of this court in amar kumar v. state of punjab, 1975 pun lj 6. the writ petition was partly allowed and it is the common case that a letters patent appeal preferred by the respondents--ajit singh and others, against this very judgment was dismissed in limine. the present appeal has been preferred by the state of punjab and the ..... . the facts are of no great significance and it suffices to mention that ajit singh and others, respondents, had brought the writ petition (giving rise to to the present letters patent appeal) to challenge the arbitration award rendered by the arbitrator on a dispute being referred to him under the act, as also the appellate and the revisional orders upholding the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 1979 (HC)

State of Punjab and ors. Vs. Ram Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-13-1979

Reported in : AIR1980P& H18

..... equality before law under article 14 of the constitution of india, is the sole, though meaningful, question that arises for determination in this appeal under clause x of the letters patent.2. as is evident from the above, the facts would pale into relative insignificance and it suffices to mention that the prescribed authority penalised the respondent-landowner under the provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 1979 (HC)

State of Haryana Vs. Man Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-29-1979

Reported in : AIR1979P& H230

s.s. sandhawalia, c.j.1. a supposed conflict of precedent had necessitated the admission of this letters patent appeal for hearing before the full bench. however, it is now the un-rebutted stand of the appellant-state of haryana that the matter stands concluded in their favour both .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 1979 (HC)

Brij Mohan Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-15-1979

Reported in : AIR1979P& H203

..... the motor vehicles act, 1939, to award interest on the compensation allowed is the only meaningful issue which falls for determination in this appeal under clause 'x' of the letters patent.2. the facts deserve notice only in so far as they are relevant to the issue aforesaid. dewan ranbir singh, father of the appellants, whilst travelling in his car collided .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 1979 (HC)

i.T.C. Ltd. Vs. Bhatia Brothers and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-29-1979

Reported in : AIR1979P& H191

..... , the matter is obviously covered by faqir chand's case (air 1978 punj & har 269) (supra), wherein it has been categorically held that against such a stay order no letters patent appeal is competent.4. in passing it may be mentioned that no challenge or criticism was levelled against the ratio of faqir chand's case before us. equally it deserves ..... conditional stay granted by the order under appeal now stands vacated.5. following the decision in faqir chand's case (air 1978 punj & har 269)(supra), we dismiss these letters patent appeals whilst leaving the parties to bear their own costs.6. appeals dismissed. ..... s.s. sandhawalia, c.j.1. the very maintainability of these letters patent appeals nos. 337 and 336 of 1977 admitted to a hearing by the full bench on the 21st of sep., 1977, stands concluded against the appellants by the division bench .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 18 1979 (HC)

Ranjit Singh and ors. Vs. Jito and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-18-1979

Reported in : AIR1980P& H126

s.s. sandhawalia, c.j.1. in this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent directed againt the judgment of the learned single judge learned in an execution second appeal, the sole issue is the challenge raised to the correctness of the view expressed in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 23 1979 (HC)

Agya Kaur and ors. Vs. General Manager, Pepsu Road Transport Corporati ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-23-1979

Reported in : AIR1980P& H183

..... heirs of ravel singh. feeling dissatisfied with the decision of the learned single judge, the heirs of ravel singh have come up in appeal under clause x of the letters patent.3. the learned counsel for the claimants has urged that the view of the learned single judge is contrary to the full bench judgment of this court in lachhman singh ..... evidence that the deceased was contributing rs. 1,200/- per annum to his family and this finding, apart from the fact that it is not open to challenge in letters patent appeal, has not been shown to be erroneous by the counsel for the corporation, however, the counsel for the corporation:has urged that the tribunal was right in making a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //