Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1980 Page 2 of about 68 results (0.046 seconds)

Feb 19 1980 (HC)

Mohinder Singh Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-19-1980

Reported in : AIR1980P& H282

d.s. tewatia, j.1. the sole question that falls for determination in this letters patent appeal is as to whether the action of the estate officer, union territory, chandigarh, respondent no. 2, in resuming the site in question on which house no. 1515 at sector .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 1980 (HC)

Brij Mohan Vs. the Chief Administrator, Union Territory, Chandigarh an ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-19-1980

Reported in : AIR1980P& H236

..... section 8-a of the act as also the one passed under section 5 of the eviction act, within one month from today.26. as regards letters patent appeal no, 102 of 1977, the matter is remanded to the learned single judge to decide civil writ petition no. 1419 of 1974 on merits in ..... any consideration of the point in depth. with respect, i hold that in neither of these cases, the law is correctly laid down.24. in letters patent appeal no. 101 of 1977, the tenant-appellant's success in getting a finding that a lessee is not only entitled to be heard before an order ..... at order is passed.20. that the estate officer was alive to the right of a lessee to be heard is apparent from the fact that in letters patent appeal no. 101 of 1977 arising from civil writ petition no. 1452 of 1974 (brij mohan v. the chief administrator, union territory, chandigarh and others), ..... but his appeal was dismissed by the chief administrator, chandigarh, vide his order dated l5th april, 1974, annexure p-3. again unlike the appellant-tenant in letters patent appeal no. 101 of 1977, the appellant-tenant herein had availed his right of appeal against the order, annexure p-4, passed against him on 19th march, 1974 ..... 10 of the act.2. before proceeding to consider the proposition posed above, it may be useful to have a few facts relevant to each letters patent appeal. in letters patent appeal no. 101 of 1977, the appellant tenant too was furnished with a copy of the show-cause notice sent to his landlord. faqir chand, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 10 1980 (HC)

Haryana State Electricity Board Vs. Smt. Pushpa Chadha and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-10-1980

Reported in : [1984]55CompCas421(P& H)

1. this is an appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent filed by theharyana state electricity board against the judgment dated the 21st of february, 1980, passed by the learned single judge of this court. 2. the learned single judge allowed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 1980 (HC)

Ajmer Singh Vs. the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Punjab, Chandig ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-06-1980

Reported in : AIR1981P& H266

..... and bye-laws made thereunder.xxxin the light of the above, it was contended that herein an administrator had been appointed for the marketed but this appointment suffers from a patent illegality because the law require an order in writing by the registrar himself, where as, in the present case admittedly the order had been passed by an addition registrar appointing ..... submitted by him that now, in essence, he was only assailing the validity of the order passed by the registrar or the additional registrar of the co-operative societies in patent infraction of the provisions of section 26(1d) of the act. that provision runs as under:--'where any committee has ceased to hold office any committee has not been constituted ..... learned judge concluded that a co-operative society being a non-statutory body a writ petition against it was not maintainable.the aforesaid view was strenuously challenged in a letter patent appeal but was conclusively repelled by the bench in dharam pal soni v. state of punjab, (1973) 2 serv lr 845(punj). subsequently dharam pal soni's case (supra) has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 1980 (HC)

Mahant Swaran Dass Vs. Shiromani Gurudwara Parbandhak Committee, Amrit ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-09-1980

Reported in : AIR1981P& H110

..... present case along with others was raised before the learned single judge hearing the matter on a difference of opinion under clause 26 of the letters patent. it was nowhere decided that a singly judge was not competent to hear the matter but apparently in view of the three objection raised and the ..... from the conflicting opinions of the learned judges composing the divisions bench.8. equally the judgments relied upon by the learned counsel for the appellant are patently distinguishable and provide no warrant for the proposition that on a difference of opinion in an appeal under s. 34 of the sikh gurdwaras act the ..... bench. therefore, the command of sub-sec (3) of section 34 of the act stands fully and amply complied with. the case, therefore, stands patently heard by a division bench of this court who have recorded their separate judgment. now what calls for notice is that clause 26 of the letters patnent ..... judgments separately have jointly recorded the following order:--'in view of our difference of opinion, and keeping in view the provisions of clause 26 of the letters patent, the case is sent to the hon'ble chief justice for referring the same to a third judge.'3. mr. t. s. mangat, the learned ..... of opinion betwixt the learned judges of the division bench hearing the same, cannot be referred to a third judge under cl 26 of the letters patent--is the point which has been raised at the very threshold in this case.2. for the limited purpose of determining the aforesaid question, it is .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 1980 (HC)

Sardari Lal and anr. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-09-1980

Reported in : 1980CriLJ1151

..... capable of, deciding that neither of the parties was then in possession, or is unable to satisfy himself as to which of them was then in such possession. it is patent that in the. impugned order, while passing orders under section 146 cr.p.c., the learned sub-divisional magistrate has jumped to the satisfaction, that neither of the parties is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 1980 (HC)

Ram Chander Vs. Mangal Singh and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-29-1980

Reported in : AIR1981P& H94

..... that the rent note (exhibit a2) was a sham transaction.3. mr. sarin, learned counsel for the petitioner has very rightly argued that the appellate authority has fallen in a patent error in ignoring the documentary evidenced of lease, i. e., rent note (exhibit a2) and given preference to oral evidence of witnesses to hold that the shop was actually let .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 1980 (HC)

Daulat Ram Vs. Girdhari Lal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-15-1980

Reported in : AIR1980P& H131

..... . thus the only conclusion is that he cannot claim to live in the house of his sister's son as a matter of right. his continuance to live there is patently at their mercy. there is no evidence to rebut the contention of the landlord that his sister's son was pressing him to leave the premises and he was also .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 1980 (HC)

Gurbaksh Singh and anr. Vs. Vir Bhan

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-09-1980

Reported in : 1980CriLJ1154

..... 1970 delhi lt 69, to contend that the power of revision conferred under section 436. criminal procedure code (old), is to be exrcised sparingly and with caution and circumspection to correct some patent error which might have occasioned miscarriage of justice. the learned single judge of that court took that view as well settled. however, with utmost respect, as at present advised, i ..... into the case of any person who; has been discharged unless such person has had an opportunity of showing cause why such direction should not be made.4. it is patent from the language employed in the section that the power of the sessions judge thereunder is to examine any record under section 397, criminal procedure code, or otherwise and that such power .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 1980 (HC)

Mam Chand and ors. Vs. the State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-24-1980

Reported in : 1981CriLJ190

..... the appellants had gone armed, they must have known that there was likelihood of murder being committed in prosecution of their common object. if ever there was a case which patently and squarely calls for the applicability of section 149, i.p.c. it is the present one. the argument on this score, therefore, merits nothing but rejection.16. the appeal .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //