Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1980 Page 3 of about 68 results (0.015 seconds)

Mar 18 1980 (HC)

Surjit Kaur Vs. Jhujhar Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-18-1980

Reported in : AIR1980P& H274

..... issue no. 1. the order of the trial court was set aside and the petition of the respondent under section 11 of the act was dismissed. the respondent filed letters patent appeal no. 638 of 1978, which was accepted on december 11, 1979. the order of the learned single judge dated october 24, 1978, was set aside. the appeal has again .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 21 1980 (HC)

Santosh Kumari Vs. Mohan Lal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-21-1980

Reported in : AIR1980P& H325

..... sub-section (1-a). the observations made in those cases are, therefore, not applicable to this case. it may be relevant to mention that the latter case was a letters patent. appeal from the former case.9. for the aforesaid reasons, 1 do not find any merit in the revision petition and dismiss the same with no order as to costs .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 14 1980 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ram Nath Prem Kumar

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-14-1980

Reported in : [1980]124ITR404(P& H)

..... of the relevant provisions of the act in a proceeding under section 154 of the income-tax act, 1961. a mistake apparent on the record must be an obvious and patent mistake and not something which- can be established by a long drawn process of reasoning on points on which there may conceivably be two opinions. '6. the above-mentioned observations .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 1980 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ferozepur Finance (P.) Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-17-1980

Reported in : (1980)18CTR(P& H)227; [1980]124ITR619(P& H)

..... ,000 which was added by the ito as interest during the accounting year on the amount due from shri bedi.17. in the view we have taken above, it is patent that the decision of the bombay high court in confinance ltd.'s case : [1973]89itr292(bom) clearly runs counter to the supreme court decisions and earlier decisions of the bombay .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 15 1980 (HC)

Mukhtiar Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-15-1980

Reported in : AIR1980P& H346

order1. briefly, the case of the petitioners is that they are students of industrial training institute, ferozepur they appeared in the examination conducted by the director, technical education, industrial training punjab (hereinafter referred to as the director), in july 1979. it is alleged that as per instructions issued by respondent nos. 1 and 2, it was decided in 1978 to give 10 race marks to any candidate who was failing by a margin of such marks the petitioners, it is alleged are failing in the examination and if they are given 10 grace marks as the candidates had been given in 1978, they would pass the examination. consequently, they have prayed that a writ be issued directing the respondents to give benefit of the 10 grace marks to the petitioners.2. the writ petition has been contested by the respondents who have inter alia pleaded that the department adopted centralized procedure of examination in july, 1978. prior to the aforesaid system, the evaluation of the papers used to be done by the examiners at the spot in the institutions but after the adpotion of centralized procedure of evaluation, the same system which was prevailing in the university was put into operation. that being the first year of the centralised procedure of examination, the department sensing the poor pass percentage decided to allow 10 grace marks as a special case for 1978, in failing subjects to those candidates who could pass the examination. the said facility was afforded in a few trades. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 1980 (HC)

Randhir Singh Vs. Ravi Inder Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-06-1980

Reported in : AIR1981P& H45

order1. shri randhit singh (petitioner) has filed this election petition under section 80 and 81 of the representation of the people act, 1951, for setting aside the election of shri ravi inder singh (respondent) to the punjab vidhan sabha from the morinda constituency no. 68.2. preliminary objection raised by the respondent in his written statement gave rise to following preliminary issues:--(1) whether an incomplete election petition has been filed? if so, what effect? (2) where the non-supply of annexures with the copy supplied to the respondent, is a defect in presentation of the election petition? if so, what effect? (3) whether the allegations of corrupt practices, mentioned in the petition, lack in full material facts and as such do not disclose a complete cause of action?3. learned counsel for the respondent first took up issues nos. 1 and 2 together. for the decision thereof, it deserves mention that as averred in the election petition, formerly the respondent was the speaker of the punjab vidhan sabha. notwithstanding the dissolution thereof, the respondent continued to hold the said office up to the election in question. while holding the said office the respondent had discretionary grants at his disposal. in order to promote his election prospects the respondent liberally distributed the said grants in his constituency. in paras. 5, to 8 of the election petitioner the material facts of the said corrupt practice are stated as under :--that there is a majri block in .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 30 1980 (HC)

Rahim Khan Vs. the Election Commission of India, New Delhi and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-30-1980

Reported in : AIR1981P& H79

order1. ch. rahim khan petitioner contested vidhan sabha election from nuh constituency of district gurgaon in march, 1972, against khurshid ahmed and others and was declared elected. khurshid ahmed filed an election petition (no 7 of 1972) under section 80 and 80a of the representation of the people act, 1951. (hereinafter the act) and the same was accepted on march 12, 1973, by the high court on the ground that the petitioner had committed corrupt practice at the election. the petitioner was disqualified for a period of six years under section 8a (old) of the act. the petitioner preferred an appeal to the supreme court under section 116b of the act against the order of the high court dated march 12, 1973 and also applied for an interim stay of the operation of the impugned order. on may 4, 1973, the supreme court passed an interim order on the stray petition of the petitioner, the operative part of which reads:--'the petitioner-appellant herein be and is hereby permitted to sign the register of the haryana legislative assembly and shall not take pat in the proceedings of the said assembly, shall not be entitled to any allowance of perquisites as a member o the said assembly. (2)...................' 2. the supreme court dismissed the appeal of the petitioner on august 8, 1974. the order of the supreme court, issued by the deputy registrar reads :'the appeal above mentioned being called on for hearing before this court on the 10 th,11th, 15th, 16th, 17th, 18 th, 19 th, 22nd, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 1980 (HC)

Sada Singh Vs. the State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-18-1980

Reported in : AIR1980P& H222

order1. this order will dispose of 27 civil writs nos. 415, 498, 775, 785, 1478, 1479, 1489, 1492, 1513, 1533, 1534, 1548, 1581, 1606, 1661, 1884, 1817, 2164 of 1977; 2658 of 1978; 267, 585, 812, 3698, 3920, 4048, 4332 and 4575 of 1979 as common questions are involved therein.2. the petitioners in all the writs are residents of mohali and madanpur which fell in the controlled area under the punjab new capital (periphery) control act 1952, (hereinafter the act). they made constructions in the controlled area without obtaining permission of the deputy commissioner under section 5 of the act. notices were thereupon issued to them under s. 12(2) of the act to show cause why the unauthorised constructions made by them should not be demolished. the petitioners raised objections. the deputy commissioner, vide order dated december 3/6 1976, overruled the same and directed the demolition of the unauthorised constructions. the petitioners have filed the writs challenging this order of the dy. commissioner. in civil writ petitions nos. 1489 and 1684 of 1977, the peti4oners did apply to the deputy commissioner on august 9, 1971, to raise constructions but the permission was refused on october 19, 1971. in civil writ petitions nos. 415 and 1606 of 1977 the petitioners applied for such permission on september 24, 1968, but no order was passed within a period of three months and their applications were returned on january 6, 1969 and january 7, 1969 respectively.3. section 12(2) of the act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 08 1980 (HC)

Rattanjit Kaur Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-08-1980

Reported in : AIR1981P& H159

1. in this appeal under section 110-d of the motor vehicles act, 1939 the appellantmakes a grouse of the inadequacy of the award of rupees 10.010/-,made in her favour by the motor accident claims tribunal, chandigarh under section 110-b of the act.2. rattanjit kaur, appellant an unmarried young girl of 26 years of age was employed as a clerk in the office of the punjab school education board and was drawing rs. 418.10 p. as her total emoluments on may 30, 1977 the date of accident. she was riding on the pillion seat of the scooter no. pnj-8909 on her way to her office in sector 17, chandigarh. the scooter was being driven by shri. c. d. kalra. when the scooter reached the crossing of the road near k. c. cinema, bus no. hra-9216 driven by lakhan pal driver banged into it and as per the evidence on record the scooter was dragged to a distance of 20 to 25 paces from the place of the impact. as a result of this accident the appellant suffered the following injuries:--1. fracture of both bones of the right leg with multiple abrasions. 2. colle's fracture of the right forearm with multiple abrasion on the forearm right side. 3. abrasion on the left elbow 3/4' diameter. 4. contusion on the left forearm on the ulter border on the middle 1/5th size 1 1/2 ' x 1'. 5. two abrasions o the lateral side of ring finger of the right hand, size of each 1/2 'x 1/2 '6. swelling of the left foot. it was an expected fracture of metacarpal and x ray was advised.2-a. as a result of the pleadings of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 17 1980 (HC)

Gurmej Singh and ors. Vs. the Financial Commissioner, Revenue, Punjab, ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-17-1980

Reported in : AIR1981P& H34

harbans lal, j. 1. this writ petitioner was heard by me in the first instance on april 25, 1980. after hearing the arguments on both sides, i came o the conclusion that there was an apparent conflict of opinion regarding the scope conflict of opinion regarding the scope and ambit of section 14-a(ii) of the punjab security of land tenures act, 1953(hereinafter to be called the act) between two division benches of this court in smt. sham kaur v. financial commissioner, revenue, punjab 1974 rev lr 25(punj) and balwant singh v. sodhi lal singh,1966-68 pun lr 380: (air 1966 punj 483) and keeping i view the importance of the questing of law involved, reference to a full bench was necessitated. it is in this background that the writ petition has been heard by the full bench. 2. for proper appreciation of the different contentions raised on both sides and the important legal question involved, brief reference to the fact of the case is necessary. some land of bahadur singh, petitioner no. 4 was declared surplus under the provisions of the act which was transferred by him in favour of his two sons and his wife, petitioners nos. 1 to 3 by means of a gift deed, dated may 29, 1955. this gift was ignored and the surplus land was allotted to respondents nos. 3 to 5 in different parcels under section 10-a of the act as tenants, who entered into possession on september 29, 1964. the petitioner as landlords filed an application before the assistant collector ii nd grade, revenue, under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //