Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 75 results (0.036 seconds)

Jul 17 1986 (HC)

Joginder Singh Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-17-1986

Reported in : AIR1986P& H339

..... instant case had positively to prove that the marking done by the board was plainly and indubitably arbitrary or affected by oblique motives. it is only if the assessment is patently arbitrary or the risk of arbitrariness is so high that a reasonable person would regard arbitrariness as inevitable, that the assessment of marks at the viva voce test may be ..... for viva voce test shall not exceed 12.2 per cent of the total marks taken into account for the purpose of selection, the board has acted improperly and committed patent illegality in keeping viva voce marks at 28.5 per cent, that the higher per centage of marks has been kept by the board with a view to absorb the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 1986 (HC)

Bansi Lal and anr. Vs. the Principal, Regional Engineering College, Ku ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-28-1986

Reported in : AIR1986P& H274

..... that situation his nomination would be regularised. it may be submitted here that one of the students has in fact left the course before 30th september, 1985.'it is thus patent in the light of the stand of the college authorities itself that radhesh gupta has not been admitted on merit or in accordance with the rules and conditions governing the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 1986 (HC)

Shamsher Singh Vs. the Commissioner, Jullundur Division, Jullundur and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-05-1986

Reported in : AIR1989P& H51

..... default prior to the amendment. on this view of the matter, the learned single judge dismissed the writ petition. that is how the matter is before us in this letters patent appeal. 5. the land of the appellant had been auctioned on june 26, 1970. the collection of land revenue and embezzlement thereof, its claimed by the revenue authorities, had taken ..... sukhdev singh kang, j. 1. the challenge in this letters patent appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated january 6, 1982, of a learned single judge of this court dismissing the writ petition (c.w.p. no. 2469 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 1986 (HC)

Municipal Committee, Bhatinda Vs. Sadhu Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-31-1986

Reported in : AIR1986P& H294

..... section 35 does not confer any power on the executive officer to authorise filing of the appeal on behalf of the municipal committee. this view was affirmed in the letters patent appeal in municipal committee, ludhiana v. surinder kumar, ilr (1974) i punj & har 420.7. reliance was then placed on pat ram v. ekam singh, 1971 cur lj 294. this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 1986 (HC)

Oriental Bank of Commerce Vs. Lajwanti Chemicals and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-14-1986

Reported in : AIR1986P& H350

..... the high court can be moved to act under this article when there has been a flagrant abuse of the elementary principles of justice or a manifest error of law patent on the face of the record or an outrageous miscarriage of justice. but the high court will not be justified in converting itself into a court of appeal and subverting ..... suit has been decided in favour of the applicant, but through oversight the decree has not been passed by the trial court in terms of o. 34. the mistake is patent on the record and this court can rectify such a mistake under art. 227. he further contends that in the said circumstances the appeal be treated as a petition under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 1986 (HC)

Gulab Ram Subhash Chander and ors. Vs. Kharaitilal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-29-1986

Reported in : AIR1988P& H45

..... has authorised the secretary to endorse or sign a number of documents on its behalf. in the light of these regulations read with 'the notification referred to above, it is patent that the managing director and the secretary were fully competent to sign and verify the application presented before the lower court under section 31 of the act. i, therefore, repeal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 1986 (HC)

Madan Lal Vs. Meena

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-30-1986

Reported in : AIR1988P& H31

..... of civil procedure and thus not one under the act, and therefore, the provisions of s. 24 of the act, would not be available in respect thereof. there is a patent fallacy in this contention inasmuch ac. the provisions of the code of civil procedure, in the hindu marriage act, 1955, are there merely to regulate the proceedings therein and not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 1986 (HC)

The Excise and Taxation Officer, Assessing Authority Vs. Hardit Singh ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-13-1986

Reported in : [1986]63STC152(P& H)

sukhdev singh kang, j. 1. the excise and taxation officer (assessing authority), ludhiana, who is appellant in this letters patent appeal, issued notice to the respondent m/s. hardit singh bhagat singh, a partnership concern, under section 11(2) of the punjab general sales tax act, 1948 (hereinafter called 'the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 1986 (HC)

Ghansham Dass Goyal and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-25-1986

Reported in : AIR1986P& H207

..... of the notification under s. 4(1) of the act was to be ignored in determining the compensation in view of s. 24 (seventhly)of the act. thus, it is patent that the petitioners was deprived of his right to deal with or improve this land in any manner since the year 1969 when the first notification under s. 4 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 1986 (HC)

Ramlal Vs. Labour Court and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-11-1986

Reported in : (1986)IILLJ231P& H

sukhdev singh kang, j.1. two questions of law arise in this letters patent appeal:(a) whether the 'appropriate government' to refer an industrial dispute for adjudication under section 10 is the state government, within whose territorial jurisdiction the workman was working and orders .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //