Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1992 Page 1 of about 203 results (0.022 seconds)

Oct 15 1992 (HC)

Pritam Kaur Vs. Gurbachan Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-15-1992

Reported in : I(1994)DMC452

..... concocted or unworthy of credence. no child would like to depose against his/her parents. it is only under the compelling circumstances that a child has to speak against the patents. it is a matter of common knowledge that a child has equal love and affection for the parent a child speaks against his mother only if he rinds that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 1992 (HC)

Smt. Uma Aggarwal Vs. Shri Yadvinder Thakar and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-13-1992

Reported in : (1992)102PLR706

..... -settlement commissioner, i. l. r. (1964) 1 punj. 905 where it was observed as under :---'where there is inherent lack of jurisdiction in an inferior tribunal and the matter is patent on the record the failure of a party to raise objection on the point of jurisdiction would not by itself debar it from getting relief on that score in a ..... a.l. bahri, j.1. this letters patent appeal is directed against the judgment of single judge of this court dated april 16, 1991, delivered in probate case no. 4/1989 whereby probate was ordered to issue in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 1992 (HC)

Bhai Shamsher Singh (Deceased by L.Rs.) and Another Vs. Punjab State T ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-17-1992

Reported in : I(1993)ACC650; 1993ACJ1029; AIR1993P& H257; (1993)103PLR757

..... the claimants but was dismissed in so far as the question of the quantum of compensation was concerned. aggrieved by the order of the learned single judge, the present letters patent appeal has been filed.2. the first argument raised by mr. r. s. bindra, learned counsel for the appellants that the case was not one of contributory negligence and the ..... orderharjit singh bedi, j.1. the present letters patent appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned single judge, whereby the appeals filed by the present appellants had been partly accepted. the facts of the case are given .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 1992 (HC)

Central Distilley and Chemical Works Ltd. Vs. Gurbharatjeet Singh and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-31-1992

Reported in : AIR1993P& H25

..... decree in the matter out of which r.f.a. no. 1523 of 1983 has arisen. the decision of the regular first appeal depends on the result of the letters patent appeal.3. on the pleadings of the parties, the learned trial court had framed the following issues :--1. whether the suit has been filed by a duly authorised person? 2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 1992 (HC)

The Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar Vs. Devinder Paul Sharma and O ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-10-1992

Reported in : AIR1993P& H230

orders.d. agarwala, c.j.1. this letters patent appeal is directed against the order of learned single judge dated december 10,1990; allowing the writ petition no, 590 of 1990, filed by devinder paul sharma. by means of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 22 1992 (HC)

B.B. Bhagwat Vs. Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-22-1992

Reported in : I(1993)ACC405; 1994ACJ301; [1994]80CompCas679(P& H); (1993)104PLR96

..... upheld by concluding that the claimants are not entitled to a higher compensation.7. aggrieved by the findings recorded by the learned single judge, two appeals have been preferred. letters patent appeal no. 637 of 1983 has been filed by b.b. bhagwat contending that the insurance company was liable to pay the compensation to the claimants. letters ..... patent appealno. 671 of 1983 is at the instance of the claimants seeking enhancement of the amount of compensation determined and payable to them.8. mr. i.k. mehta, senior advocate, ..... g.c. garg, j. 1. this order will dispose of letters patent appeals nos. 637 and 671 of 1983 having arisen from the same accident.2. shorn of details, the undisputed facts are that one joginder singh riding a cycle was hit .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 22 1992 (HC)

State of Haryana Vs. Hira Nand and Bros.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-22-1992

Reported in : (1992)102PLR401; [1993]88STC419(P& H)

..... matter was taken in appeal in all the three cases by the excise and taxation commissioner, punjab, and the honourable judges of the division bench dismissed all the three letters patent appeals. the judgment of the division bench is reported as excise and taxation commissioner v. shiv ram (1964) ilr 1 punj 622. the view taken in the case of shiv .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 1992 (HC)

The Punjab State Electricity Board Vs. Shri Hari Kishan

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-14-1992

Reported in : (1995)IILLJ1116P& H

..... corporation with immediate effect, in terms of stipulation contained in his letter of appointment. sd/-chandigarh gokul patnaikdated august 6, 1987 managing directorthe division bench of this court in letters patent appeal against the judgment of the single judge after referring to annexure r. 5 and annexure r.6 wherein it was contended that the delinquent employee knew nothing held that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 1992 (HC)

Punjab National Bank Services and anr. Vs. Jaspal Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-22-1992

Reported in : (1994)IILLJ413P& H; (1993)103PLR363

..... interpretation of an award or settlement between the parties but the workman is claiming a higher subsistence allowance as envisaged by that settlement.7. for the reasons recorded above, though patently different from the ones recorded by the trial court, the present petition is dismissed without any order as to costs. the parties are directed to appear before the trial court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 02 1992 (HC)

Chhota Singh, Etc. Vs. Union of India

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-02-1992

Reported in : AIR1993P& H79

..... in the appeal with interest was directed to be paid. an application was moved for making up the deficiency in court-fee since higher compensation was allowed by 'the letters patent bench with regard to certain categories of land and that prayer was rejected by a full bench holding thus :--'the learned counsel relying on the words 'at any stage' contended ..... learned additional district judge.'the appeal was disposed of by the learned single judge on november 10, 1981. the landowners challenged the award of the learned single judge in letters patent appeal and in grounds of appeal no. 9 it was stated thus :--'that although the appellants arc entitled to more compensation yet they on their own accord are filing this ..... of pronouncement of the judgment for permission to make good the deficiency in court-fee. the applicants had claimed less amount of compensation than the one awarded by the letters patent bench.4. this matter is squarely covered by a decision of this court rendered in banta singh v. union of india, 1988 (2) plr 49 ; (air 1988 p & h 308 ..... of the land acquisition court moved this court in first appeals and the judgments of the learned single judge in the first appeals were challenged in the letters patent appeals and those letters patent appeals were disposed of by a division bench of this court by judgment dated january 30, 1989 and the compensation was enhanced.3. these applications purporting to be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //