Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1999 Page 1 of about 205 results (0.019 seconds)

Nov 29 1999 (HC)

State of Punjab Vs. Ranjit Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-29-1999

Reported in : (2000)125PLR45

..... the single bench in terms of the order passed in som nath's case (supra). the state has challenged those orders by filing appeals under clause x of the letters patent.6. on july 18, 1986, a division bench condoned the delay in filing of the appeals but dismissed the same on merit. those orders were challenged by the state of ..... 151 to 153-a c.p.c. read with section 30 of the act. he pointed out that at least in seven cases, the state government did not file letters patent appeals and the land owners have been given the benefit of solatium and interest in terms of the order passed by the learned single judge but in the cases of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 1999 (HC)

The State of Punjab Vs. Smt. Nirmala Devi

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-17-1999

Reported in : (2000)125PLR94

..... . one word judgment rendered by the learned single judge has not only denied opportunity to the appellant to effectively challenge the same by filing appealunder clause x of the letters patent,, but has also deprived us of the opportunity to decider whether there existed good reasons for upholding the award passed by the reference court.7. for the reasons mentioned above ..... concomitant of the requirement to comply with the rules of natural justice and fairness, the courts, whose decisions are subject to appeal under the c.p.c. or the letters patent, are also under a duty to record reasons, howsoever, briefly, in support of theirdecisions.6. a perusal of the memo of first appeal filed on behalf of the appellant shows ..... the s.l.p. be transferred to the high court for hearing being decided on merits by treating it to be a letters patent appeal against, the decision of the learned single judge.2. shri rupinder khosla referred to the provisions of order 41 rule 11 of the code of civil procedure (for short ..... first appeal no.482 of 1988 which was summarily dismissed by the learned single judge on 22.4.1988 by one word judgment - 'dismissed'. the appellant did not file letters patent appear against that judgment. instead, it directly filed petition for special leave to appeal which was disposed of by the supreme court on 11.3.1991 with the direction that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 1999 (HC)

Sewa Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-20-1999

Reported in : AIR2000P& H109

..... compensation with regard to the acquired land, both before the district judge and the learned single judge, in the present appeals filed by them under clause x of the letters patent, crave further increase in the market value and consequential payment of more compensation.2. in all these appeals bearing nos. 182 to 205 of 1992 as common questions of law .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 03 1999 (HC)

Shrimati Malkiat Kaur Vs. M/S. Star Autos and Engineer and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-03-1999

Reported in : (2000)124PLR616

..... 16-4-1987 dismissing the first appeal and application for condonation of delay that has been challenged in this appeal filed by the appellant under clause x of the letters patent. 2. the sole contention of mr. ghai, learned counsel representing the appellant is that the compensation had to be assessed under section 4 of the act read with schedule iv .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 01 1999 (HC)

Anjoo Sharma Vs. D.L.F. Educational Charitable Trust

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jun-01-1999

Reported in : AIR1999P& H294; (1999)123PLR119

..... dispute has to be read while seeing the facts as a whole and taking stock of the same it must follow that there were assertions about the dispute which are patent and this contention of the respondent, therefore, must fail. 18. in that event, it had been pointed out that the petitioner was not ready and willing to get the matter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 1999 (HC)

Raj Kumar and Etc. Vs. Union Territory and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-29-1999

Reported in : AIR1999P& H197; (1999)122PLR332

..... by learned counsel for the petitioners, it will become a matter of pure conjectures and subjective satisfaction of the administrative authorities as well as the courts and the possibility of patently inconsistent orders being passed in similar cases cannot be ruled out. it will also encourage unscrupulous persons to grab public property without paying for it, a phenomenon which is wide ..... do not find any valid ground to interfere with the orders of cancellation, particularly, because learned counsel for the petitioners have not been able to draw our attention to any patent error in the finding recorded by the concerned authorities.20. the argument of shri sarin and shri jain that the impugned orders should be declared arbitrary and violative of article .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 1999 (HC)

Bharti Telecom Ltd. Vs. Altos India Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-12-1999

Reported in : [2001]106CompCas239(P& H); (1999)123PLR335

..... the same date. it is conceded by mr. l. m. suri, senior advocate, that the appeal against this order, i.e., admitting the petition was dismissed by hon'ble letters patent bench and this order has become final between the parties. 26. the order in regard to the appointment of provisional liquidator passed in ca no. 442 of 1997 was assailed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 09 1999 (HC)

Mrs. Renu Dhir Vs. Smt. Gurcharanjit Kaur Walia

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-09-1999

Reported in : (1999)121PLR626

..... affidavit. but every stamp vendor is not supposed to know each person who comes to purchase the stamp paper. the learned rent controller as well as the appellate authority were patently in error in magnifying that the stamp vendor did not know the respondent. the important fact is that the stamp paper was purchased by the respondent. having purchased, it was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 1999 (HC)

Indian Farmers Fertilizers Co-operative Ltd., New Delhi Vs. P.O., Labo ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-23-1999

Reported in : (2000)125PLR33

..... appellant-management which too was being brushed aside as perhaps the employee did not know about the revised rates of the fertilizer. obviously the employee is resisting the letters patent appeal. the letters patent appeal was admitted on december 1, 1998. 8. the learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent in person have been heard at length. 9. the learned counsel ..... entitled to only 25 per cent of the backwages instead of 50 per cent and dismissed the writ petition of the workman. 7. this still brought the management in letters patent appeal with the averments that in fact respondent no. 2 is not a workman and that the provisions of section 11-a of the act were not attracted in such ..... . respondent no. 2, who has appeared in person, has raised few objections with regard to the maintainability of letters patent appeal as well as to negative the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the appellant. according to him, the letters patent appeal was admitted to a limited question as to the calculation of period of experience the respondent had acquired before .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 03 1999 (HC)

Malkiat Kaur Vs. Star Autos and Engineers and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-03-1999

Reported in : 2000ACJ1397; (2000)ILLJ1467P& H

..... april 16, 1987 dismissing the first appeal and application for condonation of delay that has been challenged in this appeal filed by the appellant under clause x of the letters patent. 2. the sole contention of mr. ghai, learned counsel representing the appellant is that the compensation had to be assessed under section 4 of the act read with schedule iv .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //