Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: punjab and haryana Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 177 results (0.025 seconds)

Nov 10 2000 (HC)

Hari Singh Nalwa Vs. Kartar Singh Bhadana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-10-2000

Reported in : AIR2001P& H86

..... , court has to adopt purposive approach in interpreting such a statute. it may be appropriate to mention that in the judgment of eastman photographic materials co. v. controller general of patents, designs and trade marks, reported in 1898 ac 571 page 576 wherein the earls of halsbury reaffirmed the rule as follows :-'my lords, it appears to me that to construe .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 2000 (HC)

Rama Petrochemicals Ltd. Vs. in Re

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-08-2000

Reported in : [2000]100CompCas807(P& H)

..... , and also such, additional assets pertaining to such transferred division acquired since november 1, 1999; (b) all permits, quotas, rights, industrial and other licences tenancies, offices and depots, trade marks, patents, copyrights, privileges : and benefits of all contracts including the rights of supplies of rate contracts with government departments, agreements and all other rights including lease, leave and licences, and/or ..... of arrangement but herein the transferor-company and the transferee-company were doing different business. by the said scheme, certain properties are being transferred to the transferee-company. it is patently a device adopted to transfer certain assets including immovable property without due process of the law. no consideration is being passed nor any transfer deed executed. this must be taken .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 2000 (HC)

Gurjant Singh and anr. Vs. Commissioner, Ferozepore Division and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-18-2000

Reported in : AIR2000P& H161; (2000)125PLR347

..... may be mentioned that this view was also taken by the same hon'ble judge in a d.b. who decided the writ petitions giving rise to the present letters patent appeals. it is quite apparent that the provisions of east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 and the judgments that have been cited before us were not ..... of 1991 on merits as well. petitioners in civil writ petitions referred to above, being not satisfied have filed the present letters patent appeals bearing nos. 868, 884 and 869 of 1992 under clause x of the letters patent act and same as dealt with by the learned single judge need be disposed of by a common order.2. the common question .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2000 (HC)

Union Territory Vs. Parmod Kumar and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-24-2000

Reported in : AIR2000P& H203; (2000)125PLR449

..... learned single judge on the issue of entitlement of respondents no. 1 to 4 to be allotted left-over plots cannot be treated as erroneous warranting interference in the letters patent appeal.8. the issue relating to legality of the allotment of plots made to the non-official respondents deserves to be examined from another (sic) admittedly, the administration of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2000 (HC)

Hari Chand and ors. Vs. the Financial Commissioner and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-25-2000

Reported in : (2000)125PLR491

..... , added to the case, which met with a partial success before the learned single judge and is sought to meet in entirety in this letters patent appeal filed by him under clause x of the letter patent. before we may, however, notice the contentions of the learned counsel representing the appellant, in his ultimate prayer for setting aside of the orders passed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 2000 (HC)

Municipal Corporation, Amritsar Vs. Jagdamba Dutt (Thro : L. Rs.)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-19-2000

Reported in : (2000)126PLR94

..... leave on the plea of adjustment of the amount that petitioner has to pay by way of house rent/penalty. the pertinent question that has been raised in this letters patent appeal, thus, is as to whether, based upon the service rules, as also provisions contained in the payment of gratuity act, 1972 and the employees' provident funds and miscellaneous provisions ..... at rs. 2000/-. it is this order of learned single judge which has been called in question in this appeal filed by the appellant under clause x of the letters patent. 3. before we may, however, advert to the question referred to above in the light of submissions made by the learned counsel representing the parties, it would be useful to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 2000 (HC)

Baljit Kaur Vohra and ors. Vs. Dr. Vikramjit Singh Vohra and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-08-2000

Reported in : [2003]115CompCas194(P& H); (2000)126PLR683; [2004]50SCL693(Punj& Har)

..... would even further the cause of justice as it would provide a right of appeal to the appellant in consonance with the normal procedure of the court under the letters patent act. it is the settled rule of interpretation that a provision should be interpreted so as not to take away a right which may otherwise be available to a litigant ..... preliminary hearing for the admission of appeal against award rendered by the motor accidents claims tribunal, appeal against the decree or order passed under the hindu marriage act, 1955, letters patent appeals, civil appeals (contempt), company appeals, sales tax cases and gift-tax cases shall be before a bench of two judges.' 8. it appears that as per the high court ..... . in other words, prior to the amendment, the learned company judge was exercising original company jurisdiction and the orders were appealable to a division bench of this court under letters patent act (clause x) read with volume v, chapter 3, part b of the rules and orders of punjab and haryana high court. by virtue of the provisions of the amending .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 2000 (HC)

Lakhwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-21-2000

Reported in : AIR2002P& H2; 2000CriLJ4751

..... observed as follows :- '3. having carefully gone through the impugned order, we are constrained to say that the entire approach of the high court in dealing with the matter is patently wrong and opposed to settled principles of law. as earlier noticed, the petition under section 482, criminal procedure code was filed in the high court at a stage when the police had .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2000 (HC)

Head Const. Hardev Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-11-2000

Reported in : 2000CriLJ2585

..... recording of the confessional statement (annexure p-11) under threat, coercion and promise and getting the same signed while the petitioner was under close arrest since 3-11-1991, reveals patent violation of section 24 of the evidence act and rule 48(3) and (5) of the rules, resulting in substantial injustice to the petitioner.32. before dealing with the submissions ..... of murder in the proceedings. the respondents placed reliance on annexure p-11, which on the face of it is involuntary and inadmissible under the evidence act, as is also patent from the statement of the petitioner made during the trial under rule 93. the sole reliance on such a document is proof of lack of evidence on record to support ..... advised that section 342a of the cr.p.c. was not applicable to court martial under army act. the advice of the judge-advocate and decision of the court are patently erroneous in law. (v) the prohibition of administering an oath in r. 58(2)(a) is no doubt mandatory. but it is mandatory in the sense that an accused cannot .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2000 (HC)

Krishan Singh Rana Vs. Haryana State Industrial Development Corporatio ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-23-2000

Reported in : AIR2000P& H226; (2000)125PLR649

..... the high court by filing a writ petition which was dismissed by a learned single judge. the order dismissing the writ petition was affirmed by a division bench in letters patent appeal. that order became final. in the meantime, the respondent dr. k. l. anand filed a suit before the district judge, delhi against rehmatullah and wazu, who were appellant's .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //