Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: punjab and haryana Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 230 results (0.029 seconds)

Aug 03 2005 (HC)

Smt. Mahabiri Devi and ors. Vs. the State of Haryana, Through the Coll ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-03-2005

Reported in : (2006)142PLR434

..... hesitation that the landowners in the present acquisition proceedings are also entitled to a similar compensation as had been awarded in bindu garg's case, as enhanced by the letters patent bench in brij mohan's case decided on december 17, 2004. we further find that classification of the land in two categories by the reference court as well as by ..... compensation at the rate of rs.90/- per sq. yards.5. the claimant-landowners have still remained dissatisfied and have prayed for further enhancement of compensation through the present letters patent appeals.6. we have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have also gone through the record of the case.7. all the outset, certain observations made by the ..... viney mittal, j.1. this judgment shall dispose of a bunch of letters patent appeals as all the appeals have arisen out of common acquisition proceedings.2. vide a notification dated april 10, 1989, issued under section 4 of the land acquisition act (hereinafter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 05 2005 (HC)

Subash Chand, Restorer, Punjab and Haryana High Court Vs. Punjab and H ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-05-2005

Reported in : (2006)142PLR166

..... separate one, a candidate was required to clear the type test each time he sought promotion. the writ petition was accordingly dismissed leading to the filing of the present letters patent appeal.4. mr. vinod sharma, the learned counsel for the appellant, has once again argued before us that as the appellant had cleared the type writing test on 6.11 ..... harjit singh bedi, j.1. this letters patent appeal has been filed by the unsuccessful petitioner against the judgment of the learned single judge dated 24.3.1998. the appellant-writ petitioner joined service as a restorer on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 2005 (HC)

State of Punjab and ors. Vs. Jagjit Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-04-2005

Reported in : (2005)141PLR58

hemant gupta, j.1. the present appeal under clause x of the letters patent is directed against the judgment dated 4.3.1994 passed by the learned single judge whereby the writ petition filed by the respondents challenging the acquisition of their land was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 2005 (HC)

Rasila Ram Kaushal and ors. Vs. the Chandigarh Housing Board Through I ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-21-2005

Reported in : (2006)142PLR94

..... aforesaid judgments will be kept in mind by the board. dasti.5. after hearing the counsel for the appellants and going through the records as also the judgment in letters patent appeal no. 732 of 1995, we are satisfied that the matter is fully covered by the said judgment. accordingly, we dispose of these appeals in the same terms. we, however ..... conditions of allotment of category iii and category iv flats are the same. he, therefore, states that the matter is fully covered by the judgment of this court in letters patent appeal no. 732 of 1995, decided on 3.8.2005 and thus these appeals be also disposed of in the same terms. a copy of the judgment in that case ..... in the same complex. their claim was partly, allowed by the learned single judge. however, being not satisfied with the relief granted by the learned single judge, they preferred letters patent appeal no. 732 of 199s which was allowed vide order dated 3.8.2005 and the matter was remitted back to the respondent board for re-decision on the question ..... n.k. sud, j.1. this order shall dispose of three letters patent appeals l.p.a. nos. 237 of 1994, 267 of 1994 and 1022 of 1994. they arise out of the judgment of the learned single judge in civil writ petition .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 11 2005 (HC)

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Banti Devi and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-11-2005

Reported in : IV(2005)ACC121; 2007ACJ879; (2005)141PLR145

..... restrict its applicability to the appeals arising under the code of civil procedure.7. thus, we are of the opinion that an appeal under the letters patent would not be maintainable when an original or appellate decree or order is heard and decided by the learned single judge of this court.8. consequently, ..... has been held to the following effect:-'in fairness to mr. h.s. dhandi, learned counsel for the appellant, we note his submission before us that this letters patent appeal is maintainable under the provisions of 'the act'. he, however, failed to show us any provisions of 'the act' to support his contention. 'the ..... procedure (amendment) act, 2002. the said substituted section reads as under:-'100-a. no further appeal in certain cases:- notwithstanding anything contained in any letters patent for any high court or in an other instrument having the force of law or in another law for the time being in force, where any appeal ..... high court, no further appeal shall lie from the judgment and decree of such single judge.'3. a seven judges full bench of this court in letters patent appeal no. 225 of 2003, balbir kaur v. bhim singh, (2005-1)139 p.l.r. 848 (f.b.) decided on december 01, 2004 ..... has held that the letters patent appeal would not be maintainable against the judgment and order passed by the learned single judge while exercising the appellate jurisdiction. however, the said question arose in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 2005 (HC)

i.P. Vasishth, (Retd. Judge Allahabad High Court) Vs. the State of Har ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-10-2005

Reported in : (2005)140PLR70

..... has been a transgression of legislative authority as conferred by the constitution which is the source of all powers as also the separation of powers. a legislative transgression may be patent, manifest or direct or may also be disguised, covert and indirect. it is to this latter class of cases that the expression 'colourable legislation' has been applied in certain judicial ..... or has not, in respect to the subject-matter of the statute or in the method of enacting it, transgressed the limits of its constitutional powers. such transgression may be patent, manifest or direct, but it may also be disguised, convert and indirect and it is to this latter class of cases that the expression 'colourable legislation' has been applied in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 2005 (HC)

Jai Bhagwan Vs. Teshsildar-cum-A.C.i. Industries and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-13-2005

Reported in : (2005)140PLR11

..... contemplates that licencee is liable to return the amount of market fee refunded.10. consequently, i do not find that the findings recorded by the courts below suffer from any patent or material irregularity of illegality raising any substantial question of law warranting interference by this court in second appeal.dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2005 (HC)

Vijay Singh Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-31-2005

Reported in : [2005(105)FLR829]; (2005)IILLJ961P& H; (2005)140PLR101

..... between the employer and the employees in the region is likely to be adverse disturbing industrial harmony understood in its larger sense.(5) while the appropriate government can examine the patent frivolousness the demands, it shall not itself adjudicate on the demands made by the workman, which should be left to the labour court/tribunal concerned. the government should be very ..... .(2) but in doing so, the appropriate government cannot delve into the merits of the dispute and take upon itself the determination of the lis.(3) if the claim is patently frivolous and vexation the appropriate government may refuse to make the reference.(4) in deciding whether to make a reference or not the government may take into consideration whether the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 2005 (HC)

Commissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Anil Tayal (Huf)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-08-2005

Reported in : (2005)195CTR(P& H)420; [2006]285ITR243(P& H)

..... .5. shri rajesh bindal, learned counsel for the revenue, argued that the view taken by the tribunal on the validity of reference made by the wto to the dvo is patently erroneous and the commissioner did not commit any illegality by relying on report dt. 14th march, 1985, because in terms of section 16a(1)(b) r/w section 16a(4 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2005 (HC)

The Chandigarh Primary Cooperative Agricultural Devp. Bank Ltd. Vs. th ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-19-2005

Reported in : (2005)140PLR371

..... , whether superior or inferior. it can be challenged in any court even in collateral proceedings.xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx5. the high court, in our view, fell into patent error. the short question before the high court was whether in the facts and circumstances of this case, jagannath obtained the preliminary decree by playing fraud on the court. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //