Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: rajasthan Year: 1986 Page 2 of about 15 results (0.008 seconds)

May 08 1986 (HC)

Bhagwan Singh Vs. Hindustan Zinc Limited and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-08-1986

Reported in : 1986WLN(UC)198

..... m.p. irrigation and karamchari sangh v. state of m.p. and anr. : (1985)illj519sc observed as under:while conceding a very limited jurisdiction to the state government to examine patent frivolousness of the demands it is to be understood as a rule that adjudication of demands made by workmen should be left to the tribunal to decide. section 10 permits .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 24 1986 (HC)

University of Jodhpur Vs. Alok Goyal

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-24-1986

Reported in : 1986WLN(UC)513

ashok kumar mathur, j.1. this letters patent appeal is directed against the order of a learned single judge of this court dated 7-3-1986.2. the petitioner look admission in the b.e. course on october .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 14 1986 (HC)

Abhay Kumar and Co., Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-14-1986

Reported in : (1986)54CTR(Raj)188; [1987]164ITR148(Raj); [1986]63STC203(Raj)

a.k. mathur, j. 1. in all this batch of writ petitions, a common question of law and fact has been raised. therefore, they are disposed of by a single order. 2. in these writ petitions, principal submissions have been made, one regarding the validity of section 44ab and section 271b of the income-tax act and second, regarding interpretation of 44ab and 271b of the income-tax act. sections 44ab and 271b were introduced by the finance act of 1984, which read as under : '44ab. every person,-- (a) carrying on business shall, if his total sales, turnover or gross receipts, as the case may be, in business exceed or exceeds forty lakh rupees in any previous year or years relevant to the assessment year commencing on the 1st day of april, 1985, or any subsequent assessment year; or (b) carrying on profession shall, if his gross receipts in profession exceed ten lakh rupees in any previous year or years relevant to the assessment year commencing on the 1st day of april, 1985, or any subsequent assessment year, get his accounts of such previous year or years audited by an accountant before the specified date and obtain before that date the report of such audit in the prescribed form duly signed and verified by such accountant and setting forth such particulars as may be prescribed: provided that in a case where such person is required by or under any other law to get his accounts audited by an accountant, it shall be sufficient compliance with the provisions of this section if such .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 1986 (HC)

Ganpati Printing Works Through Its Partner Nathur Ram Vs. E.S.i. Corpo ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-19-1986

Reported in : 1987(1)WLN356

..... otherwise. it means that the extension of this provision of the act would be to those establishments which were not covered earlier by clause (iv). it is to make this patent and clear that notification expressly mentioned exclusion of them. this exclusion is not intended to be total exclusion but is meant to clarify the position that by virtue of this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 1986 (HC)

E.S.i. Corporation Vs. Shri Ram Chemical Industries

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-29-1986

Reported in : 1987(2)WLN610

..... , but may be any 'additional remuneration' out side the contract of employment.12. i am considering a case where the question of payment of life insurance corporation premium subsidee is patently outside the terms of contract of employment express or implied and therefore in that clause it can never come. however, since the hon'ble supreme court by this latest judgment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //