Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: rajasthan Year: 1999 Page 1 of about 12 results (0.008 seconds)

May 21 1999 (HC)

Udai Singh Solanki Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-21-1999

Reported in : 2000(1)WLC407; 1999(1)WLN649

..... 's case (supra) the supreme court has laid down that the bar of sub-section (2) of section 104 would operate against the provisions of clause 10 of the letters patent also. this is the view taken by the division bench of our high court also. the right of appeal is a creature of the statute and the statute having expressly ..... case (supra). clause 10 of the letters patent applicable to orissa high court has been reproduced in paragraph 6 of that judgment. it is substantially the same as clause 18 of the rajasthan high court ordinance, 1949. in ..... . v. orissa state finance corporation : [1997]1scr395 .5. we need not go into the arguments raised on the basis of difference in the language of clause 15 of the letters patent of bombay high court and clause 18 of the rajasthan high court ordinance because the point raised before us is exactly covered by the decision in new kernilworth hotel's ..... court and that the power flowing from the paramount charter under which the high court functions would not get excluded unless the statutory enactment concerned expressly excludes appeals under letters patent.4. learned counsel for the respondents on the other hand relied on a d.b. decision of this court in ratan kumari v. dr. chandra mohan prasad rlw 1989 (1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 1999 (HC)

Pukh Raj and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-29-1999

Reported in : AIR2000Raj89

..... ) 552 : (air 1999 sc 413), the hon'ble supreme court has held that the jurisdiction under article 227 can be resorted to if finding recorded by the court below is patently bad and suffers from clear error of law.' in a recent judgment in industrial credit & investment corporation of india ltd. v. grapco industries ltd., (1999) 4 scc 710 : (air 1999 ..... . beni prasad (1999) 1 scc 70 : (air 1999 sc 2266); and savitrabal bhausaheb kevate v. ralchand dhanraj lunja, (1999) 2 scc 171 : (air 1999 sc 602); unless the findings are patently erroneous and dehors the factual and legal position on record, exercising the power under article 227 of the constitution may not be justified and in that eventuality disturbing the findings ..... v. commr. of hills division & appeals, air 1958 sc 398). for interference under article 227, the finding of facts recorded by the authority should be found to be perverse or patently erroneous and dehors the factual and legal position on record. (vide nibaran chandra bag v. mahendra nath ghughu, air 1963 sc 1895; rukmanand bairoliya v. the state of bihar, air .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 04 1999 (HC)

Narayan Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-04-1999

Reported in : AIR2000Raj190; 2000(2)WLN160

..... applicable to the special appeals ...................... we are, therefore, disposed to hold that the provisions of section 117, c.p.c. including order 22, c.p.c. are applicable to letters patent appeals also.'10. learned counsel for the petitioner has further relied upon a case decided by another division bench of this court in the case of jagdish prasad v. state ..... urged that in view of section 117 of of the code of civil procedure (referred to hereinafter as 'the code'), the provisions of the code are applicable to the letters patent appeals, in the present context a special appeal under section 18 of the rajasthan high court ordinance, 1949 (hereinafter called as 'the ordinance'). section 117 of the code reads as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 1999 (HC)

Director, Central State Farm Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-17-1999

Reported in : [2000(86)FLR116]; (2000)IIILLJ1477Raj; 2000(2)WLC391

..... v. commissioner of hills division & appeals air, 1958 sc 398. for interference under article 227, the finding of facts recorded by the authority should be found to be perverse or patently erroneous and de hors the factual and legal position on record. vide nibaran chandra bag v. mahendra nath ghugu air 1963 sc 1895, rukmandand bairoliya v. the state of bihar ..... lunja, 1999 (2) scc 171 and savita chemicals (p) ltd. v. dyes and chemical workers' union and anr. 1999 (2) scc 143 : 1999-i-llj-416. unless the findings are patently erroneous and de hors the factual and legal position on record, exercising the power under article 227 of the constitution may not be justified and in that eventuality disturbing the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 1999 (HC)

State of Rajasthan Vs. Nav Bharat Construction Co.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-10-1999

Reported in : AIR2000Raj180

..... . v. irrigation department punjab, sirsa (supra) wherein the apex court set aside the award and referred to the new arbitrator holding that the award by the arbitrator suffered from several patent errors and that the objections raised by the respondent department were within the scope of section 30 of the act, 1940. the apex court dealt with import of expression 'is ..... is not necessary to indicate in the awards computation made for various heads and it is open to the arbitrator to give a lumpsum award, a lumpsum award is neither patently unjust or improper warranting interference by any court of law. lumpsum award by itself is not illegal as held in a plethora of decisions rendered by the apex court. my .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 1999 (HC)

Yasudeen Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-23-1999

Reported in : 2000(2)WLC294

..... judgment declare that the case is fit one of for appeal'. the language of the proviso to section 10(1) of the act is analogous to that used in letters patent appeals of various high courts. there is no reason for doubt that it was the intention of legislature that the right of special appeal would be allowed only if the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 1999 (HC)

Shri Umed Higher Secondary School, Jodhpur Vs. State of Rajasthan and ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-29-1999

Reported in : AIR1999Raj370; 1999(3)WLC490; 1999(1)WLN420

..... , air 1958 sc 86, that 'it is futile to expect when those rolls are combined that the judge can hold the scale of justice even' and the action is 'so patently and loudly obstructive that it leaves an indelible stamp of infirmity' on such decision.41. undoubtedly, those suspended and terminated teachers, who are now running the institute after recalling the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 1999 (HC)

Smt. Vandana Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-20-1999

Reported in : 2000(2)WLC564

..... the respondent no. 4 was not directed by the competent authority to take over the charge of the chairperson of zila parishad , udaipur, her nomination by the state government is patently illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction. the hon'ble single judge has committed a serious error of law in treating the state government as the competent authority prescribed by section 2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 1999 (HC)

Hardev Vs. Jaidev

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-02-1999

Reported in : AIR2000Raj142; 2000(1)WLC675

..... discussed hereinbelow.17. it is to be noticed that the learned trial court and the learned first appellate court have made a legally wrong approach and have committed substantial and patent error of law in interpreting the scope and ambit of the words 'otherwise parted with the possession' used under clause (e) of sub-section (1) of section 13 of act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 1999 (HC)

Gehlot Pan Bhandar Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-18-1999

Reported in : (2000)66TTJ(NULL)482

..... the residence of the partners on the day preceding the date of survey. there is no material on record to prove that such an explanation given by the assessee is patently wrong. there is also no material on record to show that the assessee has earned any such interest income outside the books of account. tax can be levied only on .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //