Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: rajasthan Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 41 results (0.019 seconds)

Dec 20 2002 (HC)

State of Rajasthan and anr. Vs. R.C. Misra and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-20-2002

Reported in : RLW2003(1)Raj155; 2003(1)WLN371

..... act, procedure provided in section 98 had to be adopted. this position is reflected in following statement after explaining the meaning of term letters patent:'different letters patents have been handed down by the sovereign in british india to chartered high courts which included only judicature for bengal, madras, bombay, north west ..... this act had become obsolete, redundant and was no longer required to be on the statute book. for the repeal of bombay high court (letters patent) act, 1866, it was stated that this act was introduced to correct two clerical errors and subsequently, by virtue of amendments made in 1948, ..... of kerala high court happen to be travancore cochin high court and not the madras high court. therefore, even on analogy, provision in letters patent of madras high court relating to making of a reference to a larger bench or to a third judge in the contingency as was before ..... court as on the date of coming into force the constitution of india or after appointed day under state reorganisation act, 1956 nor the letters patent of a chartered high court handed over by british govt. or an, enactment made by other competent legislative authority, were under consideration before the ..... circumstances, the question before the supreme court in hemlatha's case was firstly whether kerala high court was a high court governed by the letters patent within the meaning of sub-section (3) of section 98 cpc, which would make section 98 cpc inapplicable to the situation which has arisen .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2002 (HC)

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Etc. Vs. Smt. Pushpa Devi and ors ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-03-2002

Reported in : AIR2003Raj63; 2003(2)WLN28

..... courts which included only judicature for bengal, madras. bombay. north west provinces (allahabad) and other like patna, lahore. rangoon. but no letters patent was handed over to the high court of state of rajasthan as neither, the state of rajasthan nor its high court was in existence when the ..... thereupon called writs close, literate clause and are recorded in the close-rolls, in the same manner as the orders are in the patent rolls.35. different letters patents have handed clown by the sovereign in british india to chartered high courts which included only judicature for bengal, madras, bombay. north ..... court as intra court appeal in the following circumstances :(i) as per the specific provisions contained in rajasthan high court ordinance:(ii) or letters patent act that were existing prior to commencement of the constitutionunder article 225.(iii) once an appeal reaches the high court, it has to be ..... bench. therefore, filing of appeal intra court within the high court as per the specific provisions contained in rajasthan high court ordinance or letters patent act that were existing prior to commencement of the constitution under article 225, would not alter the nature of decree passed by either of ..... the question raise by the court was in the following terms:'the question is whether remedy of intra court appeal provided under relevant letters patent or high court ordinance cases to be available in view of the provisions of section 54 of the land acquisition act. the question whether .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 2002 (HC)

Perry Bottling Company Vs. S.S. Soda and Soft Drinks Company and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-15-2002

Reported in : 2003(26)PTC555(Raj); RLW2003(1)Raj77; 2002(3)WLC333; 2002(2)WLN593

..... to the learned counsel for the respondents, the work or the words 'fruit beer' is not invention of the plaintiff otherwise the plaintiff would have got its registration under the patents act, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act of 1970'). i perused the various provisions of the act of 1970 also. section 6 of the act of 1970 provides the ..... persons who are entitled for submitting application for getting patent under the act of 1970, as provided under the act of 1958, the provisions are there in the act of 1970 for giving ..... damages in case of infringement of the patent right of patentee.17. the learned counsel for the respondents could not point out that how the person holding registration under the act of 1958, cannot maintain a suit for ..... patent to the inventors of their work. section 48 of the act of 1970 confers exclusive right to make, use, exercise, sell or distribute the invention of the patent. section 108 of the act of 1970 empowers the court to grant injunction and relief of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2002 (HC)

Smt. Kasturi Bai and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-22-2002

Reported in : 2002(5)WLC267; 2002(4)WLN523

..... also cannot be said that the findings of the board of revenue are perverse, being founded on no material whatsoever. furthermore, in the impugned judgment annex.6, there is no patent irregularity in procedure or an error of law apparent on the face of the record. in these circumstances, no interference with the impugned judgment of the board of revenue dated ..... .8. it is well established that it is only when an order of a tribunal is violative of the fundamental basic principles of justice and fair play or where a patent or flagrant error in procedure or law has crept in or where the order passed results in manifest injustice, that a court can justifiably intervene under article 227 of the ..... temple and, therefore, entries made by the assistant settlement officer over 287 bighas of land in the name of the petitioners, which included the khasra numbers allotted to bsf, were patently wrong.(7) that it is proved from the available record that khasras no. 226, 227, 228 and 229 measuring 157 bighas of the disputed land was given to bsf. furthermore .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 2002 (HC)

School Managing Committee Shri JaIn Adarsh Vidya Niketan Sr. School Vs ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-23-2002

Reported in : RLW2003(3)Raj1996a; 2003(1)WLC160

..... .7.98 (annex. 10) passed by the tribunal, it reveals that there is patent irregularity or error of law apparent on the face of record and the findings recorded by the tribunal are perverse. hence, the present case is covered by clause (f) of ..... article 227, the high court cannot interfere with the exercise of a discretionary power vested in the inferior court or tribunal, unless its finding or order is clearly perverse or patently unreasonable.15. so far as present case is concerned, the findings of the tribunal are not based on correct appreciation of law and facts. from perusing the judgment dtd. 18 ..... .12. it is well established that it is only when an order of a tribunal is violative of the fundamental basic principles of justice and fair play or where as patent or flagrant error in procedure of law has crept in or where the order passed results in manifest injustice, that a court can justifiably intervene under article 227 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2002 (HC)

The Nagaur Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd. Vs. the State of Rajast ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-11-2002

Reported in : AIR2003Raj245; RLW2003(3)Raj2066; 2002(5)WLC118; 2002(5)WLN238

..... article 227, the high court cannot interfere with the exercise of a discretionary power vested in the inferior court or tribunal, unless its finding or order is clearly perverse or patently unreasonable.19. it may be stated here that the learned dso nagaur (respondent no. 4) has wrongly applied the circular dtd. 5-12-75 (annex. 4) to the facts and ..... india16. it is well established that it is only when an order of a tribunal is violative of the fundamental basic principles of justice and fair play or where a patent or flagrant error in procedure or law has crept in or where the order passed results in manifest injustice, that a court can justifiably intervene under article 227 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 2002 (HC)

Uttam Chand Nahar Vs. Ito

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-18-2002

Reported in : (2002)77TTJ(NULL)169

..... case and he being not the owner of the entire property, the finding given by the learned assessing officer on the basis of presumption, without establishing the benamidari is, therefore, patently wrong and, therefore, has to be quashed which the learned commissioner (appeals) did not consider. therefore, it has been prayed that the hon'ble tribunal may decide and expunge this ..... the service of notice under section 148, dated 13-10-1992, was not valid as per the assessing officer himself, the proceeding initiated vide notice; dated 13-10-1992, was patently bad in law and the continuation thereof on those very reason by the revised notice could not be said to have been provided a proper, valid and lawful jurisdiction to ..... any investment, he has concealed the facts and has furnished inaccurate particulars. issue notice under section 148.sd/-(g. c. singhvi) '27. from the perusal of the above, it is patently clear that it is because of non-disclosure of any investment, the assessing officer held that the assessee has concealed the facts and furnished inaccurate particulars. further, this reason does .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 08 2002 (HC)

Alcobex Metals Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-08-2002

Reported in : RLW2003(2)Raj744; 2002(4)WLN475

..... proper examination of the demand, it may come to the conclusion that the demands, being very stale, opposed to the provisions of the act, inconsistent with any agreement, perverse or patently frivolous and not meriting a reference. it is not obligatory on the part of the appropriate government to make a reference in each and every case as it has to ..... power to make a reference should he exercised under section 10(1) read with section 12(5) of the act. the (sic) observed as under :-'if the claim made is patently frivolous or is clearly belated, the appropriate government may refuse to make reference.'15. the constitution bench of the hon'ble supreme court, in k.p. krishan (supra) has held .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 2002 (HC)

Pyare Lal Vs. Executive Engineer and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-03-2002

Reported in : [2003(97)FLR722]; (2003)IILLJ1037Raj

..... said that the findings of the district judge, churu are erroneous or perverse or patently unreasonable or based on no material or evidence. it also cannot be said that the district judge, churu committed any illegality in setting aside that portion of order dated october ..... article 227, the high court cannot interfere with the exercise of a discretionary power vested in the inferior court or tribunal, unless its finding or order is clearly perverse or patently unreasonable.14. in my considered opinion, the findings recorded by the district judge, churu are based on correct appreciation of entire evidence and material available on record. it cannot be ..... 11. it is well established that it is only when an order of a tribunal is violative of the fundamental basic principles of justice and fair play or where a patent or flagrant error in procedure or law has crept in or where the order passed results in manifest injustice, that a court can justifiably intervene under article 227 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2002 (HC)

Mst. Bibi and anr. Vs. the Board of Revenue and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-22-2002

Reported in : 2002(4)WLC624; 2002(3)WLN592

..... article 227, the high court cannot interfere with the exercise of a discretionary power vested in the inferior court or tribunal, unless its finding or order is clearly perverse or patently unreasonable.13. so far as present case is concerned, the findings of the board of revenue are based on correct appreciation of law and facts. from perusing the judgment of ..... the learned board of revenue, it does not appear that any flagrant violation of law has been made or there is patent irregularity or error of law apparent on the face of record or it cannot be said that the findings are perverse. therefore, all these factors are lacking. in these circumstances .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //