Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: rajasthan Year: 2005 Page 2 of about 30 results (0.020 seconds)

Jan 04 2005 (HC)

Richhpal Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-04-2005

Reported in : RLW2005(1)Raj682; 2005(1)WLC548

..... source of recruitment, method of teaching, hors of teaching and the mode of payment are entirely different. in the fact and circumstances of this case the high court feel into patent error in applying the principle of 'equal pay for equal work'.94. thus, having given our thoughtful and anxious consideration to the issue involved we are of the view that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 21 2005 (HC)

J.K. Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-21-2005

Reported in : 2005(103)ECC152; 2005(186)ELT3(Raj)

..... 1995. therefore, the petitioners are within their rights to seek a direction to designated authority not to proceed with the inquiry. particularly, it has been urged that there is a patent breach of principles of natural justice inasmuch as oral hearing has been provided by one officer and decision will be taken by the other, without affording fresh hearing, which is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 12 2005 (HC)

Rajpal Sharma and anr. Vs. University of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-12-2005

Reported in : AIR2005Raj313; RLW2005(4)Raj2322; 2005(4)WLC332

..... to contest students election is not a fundamental right. para-4 of the said judgment is reproduced as under:'we are of the view that the high court fell into patent error in holding that once the university admits a student, the right to contents the students union election is a part of the right of education and as such is .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 2005 (HC)

Raghu Sharma Vs. University of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-17-2005

Reported in : RLW2005(3)Raj1993; 2005(3)WLC581

..... member of the syndicate of the university of rajasthan by vice chancellor under his powers conferred under section 21 (1) (iv) of the university of rajasthan act. this averment is patently false and shri raghu sharma was nominated vide order dated 25.8.2003 issued by the education department, govt. of rajasthan under section 21 (1) (viii) of the university of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 2005 (HC)

Kalamudeen and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-17-2005

Reported in : RLW2005(3)Raj2116; 2005(3)WLC251

..... . the order of court of session requiring the magistrate to arrest and logically commit the appellant along with the accused proposed to be committed to stand trial before it, is patently illegal and beyond jurisdiction. the case before the apex court, raj kishore prasad appellant therein was sought to be impleaded as an accused, but the police, after investigation, did not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2005 (HC)

indraraj and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-28-2005

Reported in : RLW2005(3)Raj1861

..... would cause injustice to the petitioners.8. in the result, this petition is allowed. the impugned order dated 22.6.2004 passed by the trial court is held to be patently illegal and is hereby quashed. however, it is observed that if the prosecution/jail authorities produce material before the trial court to show that the prisoners (petitioners) are violent, disorderly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 2005 (HC)

Ashu Gupta Vs. the Presiding Officer and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-17-2005

Reported in : RLW2005(4)Raj2416

..... provided it false within the ambit and scope of revisional jurisdiction. the rent control act 2001 has been enacted for speedy disposal of cases filed for eviction and it is patently obvious that for this very purpose the provision of appeal against an order of eviction passed by the tribunal by way of a summary procedure has not been provided under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 2005 (HC)

Prakash Chand SaIn Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-04-2005

Reported in : RLW2006(1)Raj149; 2005(4)WLC550

..... statement of a witness under section164 as a substantive evidence in coming to the conclusion that he had been won over.' in our considered view, learned trial judge committed a patent error of law in relying upon the statements made by pw-3 rameshwar lal and pw-7 sanwar mai before the magistrate under section 164 cr.p.c.22. in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2005 (HC)

Khushal Kanwar (Smt.) Vs. Smt. Kamla Devi and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-19-2005

Reported in : AIR2006Raj38; RLW2006(1)Raj599; 2005(4)WLC606

..... , were wholly unwarranted and in our considered view, there was no need at all to go to the circumstances like statements of witnesses pw-4 and 9 etc. when a patent fact was proved to its hilt on the basis of documentary evidence, there was no requirement of evaluating oral evidence. it is rather interesting to note that how and in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 2005 (HC)

Sunil Kumar JaIn Vs. State and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-28-2005

Reported in : RLW2005(2)Raj1425; 2005WLC(Raj)UC482

..... request, the instant criminal revision petition is being disposed of finally at the admissions stage. notices are not required to be issued to the non- petitioners in view of the patent illegality in the impugned order.2. this petition has been filed against the order dated 22.01.2005 passed by the learned judge, family court no. 2, jaipur under section .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //