Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: supreme court of india Year: 1964 Page 1 of about 53 results (0.063 seconds)

Mar 06 1964 (SC)

Penu Balakrishna Iyer and ors. Vs. Ariya M. Ramaswami Iyer and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-06-1964

Reported in : AIR1965SC195; [1964]7SCR49

..... of the conduct of the appellants in coming to this court without attempting to obtain the leave of the learned single judge of file a letters patent appeal before a division bench of the madras high court. therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the decree passed in second appeal, ..... the grant of special leave on the ground that the appellant has not moved for letters patent appeal, and it appears that the said ground is argued and rejected on the merits and consequently special leave is granted, then it would not ..... against a second appellate decision should be revoked on the ground that the appellant had not applied for leave under the relevant clause of the letters patent it is necessary to bear in mind one relevant fact. if at the stage when special leave is granted, the respondent caveator appears and resists ..... of a single judge. normally, an application for special leave against a second appellate decision would not be granted unless the remedy of a letters patent appeal has been availed of. in fact, no appeal against second appellate decisions appears to be contemplated by the constitution as is evident from the fact ..... mr. rajagopal sastri on behalf of the respondents. he contends that it was open to the appellants to apply for leave to file a letters patent appeal against the judgment of the learned single judge and since the appellants have not adopted that course, it is not open to them to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 09 1964 (SC)

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Shibu Metal Works

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-09-1964

Reported in : AIR1965SC1076; [1965(11)FLR46]; (1965)ILLJ473SC; [1965]2SCR72

..... the object intended to be achieved by the insertion of the explanation in 1953 and the subsequent additions made to sch. i itself. we are, therefore, satisfied that the letters patent bench of the punjab high court was in error in holding that the respondent's factory did not fall within the scope of the material provisions of the act. incidentally ..... under the act, the learned judge held that the said claim was not justified. 5. the respondent then preferred an appeal under the letters patent before a division bench of the punjab high court. the letters patent bench has upheld the respondent's contention that the manufacture of brass utensils does not fell within the entry 'electrical, mechanical or general engineering products ..... that the respondent had been making deposits towards the provident fund as required by the act. 24. the result is, the appeal is allowed, the order passed by the letters patent bench is set aside and that of the learned single judge restored with costs throughout. 25. appeal allowed. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 09 1964 (SC)

Jyoti Prokash Mitter Vs. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Himansu Kumar Bose, Chief ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-09-1964

Reported in : AIR1965SC961; [1965]2SCR53

..... , and so, he dismissed the appellant's writ petition in limine on january 3, 1962. 3. the appellant challenged the correctness of this decision by preferring an appeal under letters patent before a division bench of the said high court. mitter and laik jj. who constituted this bench, however, differed, and so, the learned chief justice had to constitute a special ..... after court hours. it is the validity of this order which has been impeached by the appellant in the present writ proceedings. the appellant contended that respondent no. 1 was patently in error in seeking to enforce an order passed by government of india as an executive order by which they purported to determine his age. on this basis, he claimed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 1964 (SC)

B. Rajagopala Naidu Vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-05-1964

Reported in : AIR1964SC1573; [1964]7SCR1

..... .c. 896, this court held by a majority decision that the orders and directions issued under s. 43a were merely executive or administrative in character and their breach, even if patent, would not justify the issue of a writ of certiorari. it was also observed that though the orders were executive and did not amount to statutory rules, they were rules ..... letters patent appeal preferred by the appellant. the appellant then moved the said high court for leave, but failed to secure it, and that brought him here with an application for special ..... failed and the learned single judge who heard his writ petition dismissed the petition, on october 18, 1962. the appellant then challenged the correctness of this decision by a letters patent appeal no. 214 of 1962 before a division bench of the said high court. the division bench, however, agreed with the view taken by the single judge and dismissed the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 1964 (SC)

Municipal Corporation for Greater Bombay Vs. Lala Pancham of Bombay an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-01-1964

Reported in : AIR1965SC1008; [1965]1SCR542

..... by the plaintiffs to the high court which was dismissed summarily by datar j., on august 25, 1961. on the same day the plaintiffs preferred an appeal under the letters patent which went up before a division bench consisting of patel and palekar jj. the learned judges permitted the plaintiffs to amend the plaint overruling the objections of the defendants. in ..... before the trial court and ordinarily they would not have been entitled to lead fresh evidence at that stage, much less so at the stage of the appeal under letters patent. according to them, however, it is not possible to dispose of the case on the material on record, that there are certain documents on record which, if unexplained, 'support in ..... the fact that in such a case a party should not be allowed to adduce fresh evidence at the appellate stage and much less so at the stage of letters patent appeal. then it observed : 'if the case had rested thus the matter would have been very simple apart from the amendment application. it seems to us however that it is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 1964 (SC)

New Asiatic Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Pessumal Dhanamal Aswani and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-24-1964

Reported in : AIR1964SC1736; (1964)66BOMLR702; 1965MHLJ257(SC); [1964]7SCR867

..... issued to the company in the suits under s. 96(2) of the act to be bad in law and, accordingly, set them aside. 5. the plaintiffs then filed letters patent appeals which were allowed and the chamber summonses were dismissed. it was directed that the trial judge would hear the alternative prayers in the chamber summonses and make the necessary .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 1964 (SC)

Memon Abdul Karim Haji Tayab Vs. Deputy Custodian General, New Delhi a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-19-1964

Reported in : AIR1964SC1256; [1964]6SCR837

..... also failed. then followed a writ petition by the appellant before the saurashtra high court in 1955. the writ petition was dismissed by a learned single judge; but on letters patent appeal the appellant succeeded, the high court holding that the amount was not recoverable under s. 48 of the act as it stood at the relevant time. this decision was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 1964 (SC)

N. Vajrapani Naidu and anr. Vs. the New theatre Carnatic Talkies Ltd. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-04-1964

Reported in : AIR1964SC1440; [1964]6SCR1015

..... court do appoint a commissioner to fix the value of the site based on the market value prevalent on july 28, 1958. an appeal under cl. 15 of the letters patent of the high court against the order of panchapakesa lyer, j., was dis- missed. with certificate granted by the high court of madras, this appeal is preferred by the lessors .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 1964 (SC)

C. Channabasavaiah Vs. State of Mysore and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-28-1964

Reported in : AIR1965SC1293; [1965]1SCR360

..... it is impossible to sustain their selection. to begin with it was wrong of the high court to allow a compromise of this kind to be effected when it was patently obvious that three candidates had not attended the viva voce test at all and there was nothing before the high court for comparing the remaining thirteen candidates with those who .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 25 1964 (SC)

Sri Venkata Seetaramanjaneya Rice and Oil Mills and ors. Vs. State of ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-25-1964

Reported in : AIR1964SC1781; [1964]7SCR456

..... orders, and so, the challenge made to the validity of the said orders could not be sustained. that is why the letters patent appeals preferred by the respondent were allowed and the writ petitions filed by the appellants were dismissed. it is against these orders that the appellants have come to this court ..... order was issued against the respondent restraining it from enforcing the revised tariff rates. 4. these decisions were challenged by the respondent by preferring several letters patent appeals. the division bench which heard these letters patent appeals took a different view; it held that on its fair and reasonable construction, s. 3 did confer authority on the respondent to issue the impugned .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //