Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: supreme court of india Year: 1980 Page 1 of about 67 results (0.128 seconds)

Apr 25 1980 (SC)

Rajamallaiah and anr. Vs. Anil Kishore and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-25-1980

Reported in : AIR1980SC1502; 1980Supp(1)SCC81; [1980]3SCR794; 1980(12)LC583(SC)

..... held within a period of 15 days.5. the present appellants and some others, as well as the state of andhra pradesh preferred appeals under clause 15 of the letters patent. the appellate bench consisting of kuppuswamy and p. a. chaudhary, jj., did not agree with amareswari j's view that the auction was contrary to rule 12 read with the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 1980 (SC)

international Tourist Corporation and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-15-1980

Reported in : AIR1981SC774; (1981)2SCC318; [1981]2SCR364

..... in the light of his holiness kesavananda bharathi sripadagalavaru v. state of kerala [1973] suppl. scr 1 based on the commentary of mr. seeravai was repelled.7. there is a patent fallacy in the submission of shri sorabji. before exclusive legislative competence can be claimed for parliament by resort to the residuary power, the legislative incompetence of the state legislative must ..... a tax is compensatory or not is to enquire whether the trades people are having the use of certain facilities for the better conduct of their business and paying not patently much more than what is required for providing the facilities. it would be impossible to judge the compensatory nature of a tax by a meticulous test, and in the nature .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 1980 (SC)

Moola Vs. Financial Commissioner, Revenue, Chandigarh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-26-1980

Reported in : AIR1981SC1647; 1980Supp(1)SCC608

..... the custodian from the operation of section 9. with this observation, the writ petition of the appellant was dismissed and this order was affirmed by a division bench in letters patent appeal no. 150 of 1979.3. learned counsel for the appellant here pointed out that the appellant's lease is protected under section 12 of the administration of evacuee property ..... the high court.6. we accordingly set aside the judgment of the learned single judge of the high court as well as the decision of the division bench in letters patent appeal and remit the case to the high court with a direction that the writ petition may be re-admitted and the two contentions of the appellant, viz., (i) whether .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 30 1980 (SC)

J.P. Sharma Vs. Naresh Chand Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-30-1980

Reported in : (1982)2SCC42

..... naresh chand gupta on the vakalatnama and other papers and on the rent receipt. prima facie, it seems to me personally that the signatures do not appear to be a patent forgery by the tenant. the entire question has to be decided by a proper enquiry which alone would unfold the truth. for these reasons, therefore, i would direct the rent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 1980 (SC)

Brijendra Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-25-1980

Reported in : AIR1981SC636; (1981)1SCC597; [1981]2SCR287; 1981(13)LC48(SC)

..... for retention of a right or interest of the transferor in the ostensibly transferred land in excess of the ceiling area, even on or after june 8, 1973, will be patently not in 'good faith'. but the proviso (b) to sub-section (6) of section 5 extends the negative aspect of the concept 'good faith' a little further by indicating, that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 1980 (SC)

Rajamalliah and anr. Vs. Anil Kishore and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-04-1980

Reported in : AIR1980SC2037; 1980Supp(1)SCC226; 1980(12)LC813(SC)

..... held on 21st and 22nd september, 1979 and directing that a reauction should be held within fifteen days. appeals preferred to a division bench under clause 15 of the letters patent by the government of andhra pradesh and the successful bidders at the auction were dismissed, further appeals preferred to this court under article 136 of the constitution by the government .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 01 1980 (SC)

State of Jammu and Kashmir Vs. Sanahullah Mir

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-01-1980

Reported in : AIR1980SC1349; (1980)3SCC272; [1980]3SCR281

..... on the original side of the high court of jammu & kashmir. the learned judge dismissed the suit. the state, the appellant in this appeal, failed in appeal before the letters patent bench of the high court. the matter has now come before us.the findings of the learned single judge are :-(1) that the lands in dispute were in continuous possession .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 31 1980 (SC)

Col. Avtar Singh Sekhon Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-31-1980

Reported in : AIR1980SC2041; 1981(29)BLJR110; (1981)IILLJ405SC; 1980Supp(1)SCC562; [1981]1SCR168; 1981(13)LC180(SC)

..... . v. sheik habib : [1975]3scr933 this court observed:a review of a judgment is a serious step and reluctant resort to it is proper only where a glaring omission or patent mistake or like grave error has crept in earlier by judicial fallibility.... the present stage is not a virgin ground but review of an earlier order which has the normal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 12 1980 (SC)

State of Maharashtra Vs. Krishnamurti Laxmipati Naidu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-12-1980

Reported in : AIR1981SC617; 1981CriLJ9; 1980Supp(1)SCC455

..... asserted that chandrakant son of the deceased had come out armed with a knife, thereby, obliquely suggesting that it was the son who had stabbed his father. this was a patently false and absurd position taken by him. the accused did not say that chandrakant had come armed with a stick and beat him. on the other hand, he alleged that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 27 1980 (SC)

Land Acquisition Collector and anr. Vs. Durga Pada Mukherjee and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-27-1980

Reported in : AIR1980SC1678; (1980)4SCC271; [1981]1SCR573

..... so vitiated, the declaration had to be taken at its word. on the findings of fact arrived at by the division bench, therefore, the letters patent appeals merited nothing but dismissal.6. learned counsel for the respondents urged that they were really entitled to a finding of malafides on the part of the ..... of the constitution were, therefore, pre-mature. all the five petitions were in the result dismissed by the learned single judge.4. in the letters patent appeals decided by the impugned order the argument advanced on behalf of the respondents before us that the purpose of the acquisition as stated in the impugned ..... 1)(a) of the constitution by the high court of calcutta and are directed against its common judgment dated the 17th february, 1967 accepting five letters patent appeals and, in reversal of the judgment of a learned single judge, issuing a writ of mandamus directing the land acquisition collector, burdwan and the state ..... success, will be to stultify itself, abdicate its functions and abjure its duties.and on this finding accepted all the five letters patent appeals.5. after hearing learned counsel for the parties we find that the learned judges of the division bench seriously erred in accepting the letters ..... patent appeals in view of the finding arrived at by them that malafides or a colourable exercise of power on the part of the state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //