Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: patents Court: supreme court of india Year: 1999 Page 1 of about 116 results (0.142 seconds)

Jan 11 1999 (SC)

State Bank of India Vs. Collector of Customs, Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-11-1999

Reported in : 2000(67)ECC404; 2000LC529(SC); 2000(115)ELT597(SC); JT2000(1)SC108; 2000(1)SCALE72; [2000]1SCR137

..... these rules.interpretative note:rule 9(1)(c) 1. the royalties and licence fees referred to in rule 9(1)(c) may include among other things, payments in respects to patents, trademarks and copyrights. however, the charges for the right to reproduce the imported goods in the country of importation shall not be added to the price actually paid or payable ..... . now, if we refer to the interpretative note relating to rule 9(1)(c) it says that royalties and licence fees may include, among other things, payments in respect to patents, trade marks and copyrights. there is, however, an exception which says that the charges for the right to reproduce the imported goods in the country of importation shall not be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 1999 (SC)

The Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd. and anr Vs. the Commissioner ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-17-1999

Reported in : AIR1999SC3036; [1999]239ITR587(SC); JT1999(5)SC654; 1999(5)SCALE40; (1999)7SCC266; [1999]Supp1SCR504

..... is true that in some cases, a trading receipt may contain a fraction of sum as taxable income, but in other cases such as interest, commission, transfer of rights of patents, goodwill or drawings for plant and machinery and such other transactions, it may contain large sum as taxable income under the provisions of the act. whatever may be the position .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 22 1999 (SC)

Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board Vs. Easun Engineering Co.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-22-1999

Reported in : (2002)10SCC458

..... appeal before the high court which was listed before the two hon'ble judges, who differed in their opinion. the matter was then referred under clause 36 of the letters patent of the andhra pradesh high court, to the third hon'ble judge, who agreed with the hon'ble judge who allowed the appeal. accordingly, the appeal was allowed and the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 1999 (SC)

M/S. Lokmat Newspapers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Shankarprasad

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-19-1999

Reported in : AIR1999SC2423; 1999(3)ALLMR(SC)701; JT1999(4)SC546; (1999)IILLJ600SC; 1999(4)SCALE109; (1999)6SCC275; [1999]3SCR907; 2000(2)SLJ144(SC); 1999(2)LC1201(SC)

..... proceedings from the labour court onwards up to the learned single judge's decision in the high court and it is only in the letters patent appeal that he ultimately succeeded. considering all these aspects, in our view, interest of the justice will be served if, while confirming the ..... aforesaid point is, therefore, answered in affirmative against the appellant and in favour of the respondent by holding that the appellate court had corrected patent errors of law and had not interfered with the pure findings of the facts not connected with the relevant questions of law with which they ..... the said notice, as we have seen earlier, on that score may become inoperative or illegal. still the reason for termination cannot be said to be patently false. we, therefore, disagree with the conclusion of the division bench of the high court in view of our aforesaid findings regarding non-applicability of clauses ..... of the employer's rights;(c) by falsely implicating an employee in a criminal case on false evidence or on concocted evidence;(d) for patently false reasons;(e) on untrue or trumped up allegations of absence without leave;(f) in utter disregard of the principles of natural justice in ..... on merits.13. in the light of the aforesaid rival contentions, the following points arise for our consideration:1. whether the respondent's letters patent appeal was maintainable;2. if yes, whether the division bench was right in taking the view that the impugned retrenchment order was violative of section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 1999 (SC)

Sita Ram Singh Vs. Ram Kishori Devi and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-18-1999

Reported in : (1999)9SCC112

..... sustain the impugned order of the high court which is, accordingly, set aside. this appeal consequently succeeds and is allowed.5. the delay in filing the letters patent appeal is condoned and the lpa is remanded to the high court for its fresh disposal on merits in accordance with law. we request the high court to dispose of ..... and that he came to know about it only on 24-4-1995. in this fact situation, the high court ought to have condoned the delay and heard the letters patent appeal on merits. dismissal of the lpa on the ground of delay in the facts and circumstances of this case was neither fair nor proper. we, therefore, are unable to ..... pronouncement of the judgment and that he learnt about it only on 24-4-1995 after which he applied for a certified copy of the judgment and filed the letters patent appeal. from a perusal of the record including the affidavits filed in this case, we are satisfied that the appellant did not acquire any knowledge about the pronouncement of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 16 1999 (SC)

Corporation of Madras Vs. M.K. Buhari

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-16-1999

Reported in : 2000(9)SCC497

..... to the extent of rs 6600 together with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till payment, by judgment and decree dated 20-3-1984.4. in letters patent appeal, the division bench modified the said judgment and decreed and awarded mesne profits @ rs 1650 per month from may 1976 to april 1978. against that judgment, this appeal is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 16 1999 (SC)

Corporation of Madras Vs. M.K. Buhari

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-16-1999

..... to the extent of rs 6600 together with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till payment, by judgment and decree dated 20-3-1984.4. in letters patent appeal, the division bench modified the said judgment and decreed and awarded mesne profits @ rs 1650 per month from may 1976 to april 1978. against that judgment, this appeal is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 1999 (SC)

Pattakkal Kunhikoya (D) by Lrs. Vs. Thoopikal Koya and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-15-1999

Reported in : JT1999(10)SC178; 1999(7)SCALE594; (2000)2SCC185; [1999]Supp5SCR371

..... not a regular court of appeal to which every judgment of the high court may be brought for a further scrutiny in regard to its correctness. there must be some patent error of law which have resulted in the miscarriage of justice as noticed above, otherwise and in the normal circumstances this court would not be justified in interfering with the ..... from amini and how many generations ago. pw-1 has sworn that his information is that it was the mother of beeashabi who went to androth but it must be patently false. it must have been some generations ago that pandambeli people went to androth because ellis has said that pandambeli people founded a family called pattakkal at androth and that ..... , to understand its meaning, though dw-1 has stated that he has seen many other documents in which the word, 'santhanakarathi had been used to mean the wife. it is patent that this word has its origin from the word a common malayalam word and that 'santhanakarathi' means one who give 'issue'. whether beeashabi was described as the giver of 'issue .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 1999 (SC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Bhaskar Picture Palace

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-05-1999

Reported in : JT1999(10)SC563; (1999)9SCC232

..... application had, therefore, been rejected not only under sub-section (1-a) but also under sub-section (1). the submission has only to be stated to be rejected. it is patent from para 7.1, which we have quoted, that the only reason for not proceeding with the applications was the objection raised by the commissioner under sub-section (1-a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 1999 (SC)

Food Corporation of India Vs. M/S. Evdomen Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-17-1999

Reported in : AIR1999SC2352; 1999(2)ARBLR220(SC); JT1999(1)SC506; 1999(1)SCALE503; (1999)2SCC446; 1999(2)LC899(SC)

..... business would be a place where the court would have jurisdiction. therefore, under clause 12 of the letters patent of the bombay high court, the bombay high court would have jurisdiction over the subject-matter of the dispute in the present case because the appellant does carry on business ..... diction. jurisdiction of the bombay high court to entertain a suit under its ordinary original civil jurisdiction is determined by clause 12 of the letters patent of the bombay high court. under clause 12 of the letters patent a place where the defendant, or each of the defendants where there are more than one, at the commencement of the suit, carry on .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //